Channel
@Emptiness_ofspace
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
669subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001861125693 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Emptiness_ofspace |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Emptiness_ofspace |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 669 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 668 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (30 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,603 |
| Reactions total | 447 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
447 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 134 | 30.0% | |
| ❤ | 96 | 21.5% | |
| custom 5256034449740550270 | 46 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5280648950263604688 | 38 | 8.50% | |
| custom 5280697564998425415 | 37 | 8.28% | |
| custom 5281017870774459836 | 30 | 6.71% | |
| custom 5280477160161699663 | 25 | 5.59% | |
| 🕊 | 17 | 3.80% | |
| custom 5281007854910725447 | 12 | 2.68% | |
| custom 5909159358960241804 | 7 | 1.57% | |
| custom 5341762795832618372 | 5 | 1.12% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 447reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Меня нарисовали.🌟 Невероятно приятно, когда люди вообще помнят про меня, особенно в таком творческом ключе. _ Автор: https://t.me/damrnare
🔥33❤22🕊4custom 52806489502636046882custom 59091593589602418041
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 528069756499842541518🔥8❤7custom 52810078549107254474
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 528069756499842541517🔥7custom 52810078549107254477
Нет слов.
custom 525603444974055027034🔥8custom 52806489502636046881
Друг отправил эту картинку про Хаббла, я отметила, что на аватарке канала он тоже курит в сторонке. А затем перестало быть смешно, так как Хаббл правда курит на половине фотографий.
🔥21🕊8❤7custom 52810178707744598362custom 52804771601616996631custom 52810078549107254471custom 59091593589602418041
А чего добились вы?
🔥14🕊5
Channel photo updated
Классификацию галактик и их виды по морфологии Хаббла разбирать?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥9custom 52804771601616996632custom 52560344497405502701
Отметила несколько низменностей и катеров. Однажды я уже говорила, что низменности на Луне назвали морями, так как учёные считали, что в низменностях есть вода. Ошибка плотно закрепилась по сей день, хотя, конечно, все уже понимают, что воды там нет. Но с названиями история более интересная. С морем Холода, например, всё просто – оно расположено на севере Луны узкой и длинной полосой. Создатели карты применили ту ж…
❤26custom 52804771601616996636🔥5
Конечно, я не занимаюсь астрофото и у меня из-за влажности окуляр и искатель покрылись влагой, но попытка была.
❤30🔥11custom 59091593589602418045custom 52804771601616996634custom 53417627958326183724
Можно считать за юбилей?
custom 528101787077445983628🔥15custom 528064895026360468812custom 52804771601616996633❤2custom 52560344497405502701
Мою камеру можно сравнить разве что с первыми в истории электронными устройствами, но, думаю, надо было сфотографировать на память. Полежит здесь. Единственная причина, по которой я жду отвратительное лето – грозы.
custom 528064895026360468823custom 525603444974055027010custom 52804771601616996639🔥3❤2custom 52806975649984254152custom 53417627958326183721
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Emptiness_ofspace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Классификацию галактик и их виды по морфологии Хаббла разбирать?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 47,174 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Emptiness of space” (@Emptiness_ofspace), 669 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Emptiness_ofspace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.