Channel
@EmmaMyeres
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
91subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002296632375 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EmmaMyeres |
| Description | Curated with care by Eloise (@gryimalkin ♥️). This is a sanctuary for @EMontgomeries; a space of warmth and admiration. Any form of hate or unkindness toward Emma will lead to an immediate and permanent ban. Let love be the only thing we share here <3 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EmmaMyeres |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 91 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 91 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 28 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💋 | 3 | 75.0% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2025 to 12 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @EmmaMyeres. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2025 to 12 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Hi everyone. [] Currently I have so many things to do in real life, so I've decided to leaving roleplay. Feel free to unsubs because this channel will not active anymore. And if you save my contact @gryimalkin, feel free to unsave. Thank you so much :]
Sticker, posted without a caption
Beneath the soft glow of golden hues, she sits poised against a tapestry of blooming lotuses—an image of quiet strength and understated grace. Draped in silk that whispers of distant lands, she holds a small porcelain tiger 🐅, a symbol of courage hidden within serenity. Every detail speaks in metaphors—the lotus for resilience 🌺, the tiger for power, the amber tones for warmth and allure. She is both muse and myster…
Photo, posted without a caption
Can't believe Wednesday 2 is out now! Go watch it <3
Seventeen years old me :D
“There’s something hauntingly beautiful about quiet days by the sea — where the wind whispers secrets only the heart can hear, and time feels like it’s folding in on itself. Wrapped in vintage patterns, under fading skies and forgotten gazebos, I found a strange kind of peace. Not the loud kind, but the soft, echoing silence that lingers in old photographs and unsent letters. Maybe we are all just stories waiting to …
If Wednesday wanted this many people in her room, it would already qualify as a crime scene.
Few dump ✨
💋2🆒1
A burst of bold femininity wrapped in gothic glamour and I’ve stepped into my Wednesday 2 era with a fierce evolution. The pastels are gone, traded for crimson lace and sculpted elegance that feels like fearlessness stitched into every seam. It’s McQueen meeting my inner werewolf royalty—a look that howls sophistication while still honoring the vibrant spirit that’s always been mine. I’m not just part of the story an…
Photo, posted without a caption
🕯️ The shadows return sharper, chicer, and cloaked in mystery. 🕷️ Nevermore’s halls await another wickedly stylish semester.
💋1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @EmmaMyeres. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,170,589 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UNSUBS.” (@EmmaMyeres), 91 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EmmaMyeres.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.