— Чибики для второго победителя. 👋 Решила начать со второго приза. 🍼 🍼 #Арт
custom 52895135007695261026custom 54092197669319592053custom 52446187960349740152custom 53075312794182897492custom 53414294934855745141custom 54384703754133913681

Channel
@Emkacips
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
61subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003962767682 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Emkacips |
| Description | Аватарко: @k1llerscutie 〢 ദ്ദി◝ ⩊ ◜.ᐟ Лс : @AllMighthusband |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 19 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Emkacips |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 61 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 61 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (19 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 793 |
| Reactions total | 111 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
111 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5307531279418289749 | 37 | 33.3% | |
| custom 5289513500769526102 | 26 | 23.4% | |
| custom 5289882030438359456 | 13 | 11.7% | |
| custom 5436008581763734416 | 10 | 9.01% | |
| custom 5409219766931959205 | 9 | 8.11% | |
| custom 5438470375413391368 | 6 | 5.41% | |
| custom 5244618796034974015 | 3 | 2.70% | |
| custom 5292235517897744513 | 3 | 2.70% | |
| custom 5291874822249258727 | 2 | 1.80% | |
| custom 5292121172983423684 | 1 | 0.901% | |
| custom 5341429493485574514 | 1 | 0.901% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
— Чибики для второго победителя. 👋 Решила начать со второго приза. 🍼 🍼 #Арт
custom 52895135007695261026custom 54092197669319592053custom 52446187960349740152custom 53075312794182897492custom 53414294934855745141custom 54384703754133913681
Трейд с эмкоооой, получилось прикольно (наконец-то я закончила) Осхканон с дотторе (◍•ᴗ•◍) ————————————————————— ★ #Трейд #Арт #Геншин
custom 52895135007695261028custom 53075312794182897492custom 52446187960349740151custom 54092197669319592051
⦅⪨܀𝑪𝑶𝑳𝑳𝑨𝑩܀⪩⦆ ⦅ᕦЛетний коллаб с участниками проекта. Свершилось чудо и я снова радую ребят коллабом. На этот раз, я решила больше заморочиться над фоном и придумала даже тематику. Мне очень нравится результат, все огромные молодцы! Спасибо большое всем за участие! ᕤ⦆ Участники коллаба: ➥(я🙋) - Хироки ➥(@Bcem_poka_ok) - Ямэ ➥(@S4nniiii) - Азуми ➥(@xutchan) - Элизабет ➥(@Jxinkink) - Куройами ➥(@BYDTE_WU_PROKLYATU) - К…
custom 53075312794182897494custom 52895135007695261023custom 54092197669319592052custom 52921211729834236841custom 52922355178977445131
— Трейд с @Качико! 🤩 С трейдами пока всё..🤩 🤩🤩 #Арт #Трейд
custom 53075312794182897499custom 52895135007695261023custom 52898820304383594562custom 54360085817637344161
— Нэо на летний коллаб. 🌊 Попробовала такое хобби, как рисование, больше не буду им заниматься. 🤍🪼🤍#Арт
custom 54360085817637344169custom 54384703754133913684custom 52918748222492587272custom 52898820304383594561custom 53075312794182897491
— Живая, честно.. 🥹 🤩 #Wip
custom 528988203043835945610custom 53075312794182897495custom 52895135007695261024
Вот и снова день рождения, мне 19 теперьп мини видосик в честь этого и подборка любимых последних работ!! можете репостнуть мне на радость пасиба всем кто тут остался и терпит мои постоянные смены фандомов 💝🫡
custom 53075312794182897491
Очень много полуголых осок!! Наконец-то мы закончили этот коллаб, времени он занял, конечно много, но результат потрясающий, все очень креативные, костюмы выглядят очень красиво🙏🏼 Спасибо всем за участие!! Участники: @yoyokmi @mittttski00 @Emkacips @CONFUZZZZZZ @Rizettoiyi @sovabul @wyqukis #арт #коллаб
custom 52922355178977445132custom 53075312794182897491
— А вот и итоги лоты! 🥱 Победителей прошу написать мне в лс: @AllMighthusband Господа, не унывайте, приколюх будет ещё ой как много. 🍼 #Безделушка
custom 53075312794182897499custom 54384703754133913681
⦅⪨܀𝑵𝑬𝑾 𝑨𝑹𝑻܀⪩⦆ ⦅ᕦНарисовала такой милый артик с Хироки и Нэо. Они канон пара. 😋 Хироки, мой мальчик, настоящий мужчина и джентельмен (каблук), так что Нэо очень сильно повезло с ним. Кстати, я думаю, как можно назвать их шип, но идей вообще нет, буду ещё думать. Эмка, не бей меня.ᕤ⦆ ﹏﹏ 𓆩⊰Время работы:⊱𓆪﹏﹏ ░𓊈⊹𝟑:𝟎𝟏⊹𓊉░ ﹏﹏﹏𓆩⊰Хештеги:⊱𓆪﹏﹏﹏ #Фп #Мга #Проект #Хироки #Шип #Нэо
custom 53075312794182897493custom 54092197669319592053custom 52895135007695261022
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Emkacips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 568,534 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Эмка, угомонись.” (@Emkacips), 61 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Emkacips.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.