Channel
@Elle_chka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
393subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002037560367 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Elle_chka |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Elle_chka |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 393 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 393 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (19 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,347 |
| Reactions total | 420 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
420 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 133 | 31.7% | |
| custom 5246942493601199269 | 96 | 22.9% | |
| custom 5438355712671498374 | 75 | 17.9% | |
| custom 5463303691635302144 | 43 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5447515198581659646 | 37 | 8.81% | |
| custom 5247024239713745741 | 36 | 8.57% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 420reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вы уже видели эту картину но как же хочется показать её ещё в нормальном освещении и в раме))) как она мне нравится…… 🥀 У неё очень интересное название «дружба»
custom 524694249360119926914custom 54633036916353021445❤2custom 54383557126714983741
Сейчас активно обсуждают тему ИИ-клипа монеточки, что думаете на этот счет ? Действительно ли можно причислить нейронку к творчеству… и как вам новая профессия «ии-художник»
custom 52470242397137457417
Какие же у меня красивые заказчики… признавайтесь, с подиума сошли ? 🙂 🌸Я такое удовольствие получаю рисуя вас, безумно признательна что выбираете меня. Мне так нравится эта работа…. 💃
❤21custom 524694249360119926912custom 54383557126714983743custom 54633036916353021442custom 52470242397137457411
Какой контент вам больше нравится на канале ?
The shares total 211%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
custom 52469424936011992692custom 54383557126714983741custom 54633036916353021441
🖌🤩 А я тут вот такой пейзажик сельский начала маслом. Формат 50х40
❤16custom 54633036916353021447custom 52470242397137457415custom 54383557126714983742
Работаю над новым заказом ❤️ 🕊️Мне безумно приятно что вы выбираете меня в таком тонком деле как портреты, и мне очень нравится концепция парных (двойных) портретов чувствуется столько любви, нежности между людьми… (Кстати это такой чудесный подарок если вы состоите в отношениях на расстоянии, могу изобразить вас вместе, сократим эти километры между вами!) 🐱 Всем любви ! 💋
custom 544751519858165964622custom 524694249360119926910custom 54633036916353021447custom 52470242397137457412
Ко мне приехал вот такой малыш 😭 (распаковку можно глянуть в инст если интересно) Осталось только дождаться холстиков и можно топать пленэрить. Безумно хочу уже его распробовать в деле 🤩🖌 хе-хе
custom 543835571267149837414custom 524694249360119926911custom 54633036916353021442
Выложила процесс создания первого портрета 🌸 Посмотреть можно тут 👉🏻 https://www.instagram.com/elli_artifex?igsh=MXBiNGE5cHRxeHdwbQ%3D%3D&utm_source=qr (Инст) И тут 👉🏻 https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8tVagyf/ (тик ток) Стараюсь почаще снимать процессы) хотя пока что не привычно 😅
custom 524694249360119926911custom 54383557126714983746
Парные портреты на заказ 💌 Подарок в котором чувствуется внимание, душа, любовь 🤎 Мне очень понравилось над ними работать, и как мне нравится результат…. 💃У меня ещё не заказывали парных портретов, для меня это большая честь объединить два любящих сердца на одной работе 🌹 🌸Возьму ещё несколько заказов на портретики если интересно пишите сюды: @Elli_andreevna Всем любви и творческих успехов 💋
❤24custom 524694249360119926915custom 54633036916353021449custom 52470242397137457412
Рисую парные портреты 🚬 🌸Присылайте свои арты в комментарии 🕊️
❤26custom 543835571267149837410custom 52470242397137457416custom 54475151985816596463custom 52469424936011992691
Elle ☽ pinned a photo
🍀Я попробовала вести инсту https://www.instagram.com/elli_artifex?igsh=MXBiNGE5cHRxeHdwbQ%3D%3D&utm_source=qr Честно не знаю что из этого получится, но как платформа для творчества мне она очень нравится. Столько идея, вдохновения. Такие невероятные художники , и что меня радует очень много традишки. ⚱️🏺🪨
❤14custom 54383557126714983746custom 54475151985816596466
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Elle_chka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой контент вам больше нравится на канале ?
The shares total 211%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 706,363 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Elle ☽” (@Elle_chka), 393 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Elle_chka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.