https://t.me/AyLiN_Ego1

Channel
Əłı🦢🤍
@Elisaa_text
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
319subscribers
-72 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002152193482 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Elisaa_text |
| Created | Between 1 April 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Elisaa_text |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 06:19 | 319 | -13 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:49 | 332 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:18 | 337 | -13 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 19:09 | 350 | -7 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 02:18 | 357 | -20 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 377 | -15 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 392 | +2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:56 | 390 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 391 | no change |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 391 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 15s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🆒 | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
هرموقع ناراحت میخوابم میای تو خوابم پس چرا تو واقعیت حواست بهم نیست؟
من اگه برگردم عقب بازم همین اشتباهاتی که تو این سال ها کردمو تکرار میکنم,میشناسم خودمو,میدونم چقدر زبون نفهمم🙏🏻
💔
𝘔𝘺 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘢 𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 قلب من خیلی وقته سرد شده
𝘐𝘮 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘥𝘰𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘮𝘺 𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 من بخشنده نیستم صبر منو امتحان نکن
𝘓𝘪𝘧𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘴𝘵 زندگی برای اعتماد کردن ساخته نشده
#معنی_تایما.." ⁰¹:⁰¹ همیشه به یادته ⁰²:⁰² عاشقته ⁰³:⁰³ دوست داره ⁰⁴:⁰⁴ دنیاشی ⁰⁵:⁰⁵ قرار میزارین ⁰⁶:⁰⁶ ازت خوشش میاد ⁰⁷:⁰⁷ بهم میرسید ⁰⁸:⁰⁸ محبت ⁰⁹:⁰⁹ زندگیشی ¹⁰:¹⁰ بدون طُ نمیتون ¹¹:¹¹ بهت فکر میکنه ¹²:¹² دیوونته ¹³:¹³ نفسشی ¹⁴:¹⁴ مال خودته ¹⁵:¹⁵ …
🆒1
00:00
𝘙𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 : 𝘗𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘯'𝘵 𝘭𝘰𝘷𝘦 𝘶 , 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘶 با خودت تکرار کن : آدما دوست ندارن، لازمت دارن!
𝘚𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘢 𝘩𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 لبخند زدن عادت شد نه حس
𝘚𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘣𝘳𝘰𝘬𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦 از بیرون لبخند میزنم از درون شکستم
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Elisaa_text. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Elisaa_text named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026 · confirmed gone 3 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Official_JaNaN · 43,288
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Əłı🦢🤍” (@Elisaa_text), 319 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Elisaa_text.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.