Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мир Eliora

Channel

Мир Eliora

@Eliora13

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

391subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001209857750
TypeChannel
Username@Eliora13
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Eliora13

Growth

374391382.57 August 2026 — 374 subscribers8 August 2026 — 374 subscribers8 August 2026 — 375 subscribers16 August 2026 — 386 subscribers24 August 2026 — 387 subscribers31 August 2026 — 386 subscribers10 September 2026 — 391 subscribers7 August 202610 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 34 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 371–394 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 00:56391+5
31 Aug 2026, 19:43386-1
24 Aug 2026, 02:48387+1
16 Aug 2026, 19:23386+11
8 Aug 2026, 09:02375+1
8 Aug 2026, 06:18374no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:07374first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 23s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

83 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4453.0%
😍1821.7%
1518.1%
😁44.82%
11.20%
🤩11.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC93 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

👜 В Starbucks мне очень понравилась фирменная кожаная сумка стоимостью 3700 юаней (примерно 44 500 ₽). Долго ходила вокруг нее и думала: купить или не купить... В итоге не купила. Как бы ни хотелось, понимала, что впереди еще очень много интересных прогулок, а сумка пока останется маленькой хотелкой. 😔 Кошелек в тот день все-таки победил. Самые крупные, то есть головные Starbucks находятся в шести городах мира: Ша

🔥11😍21

6 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC115 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Я побывала в Starbucks – ТОП-1 в мире, двухэтажной кофейне, где находятся мини-завод по производству кофе, магазин, бар и кафе. Это невероятное место. Как только увидела его, чуть не упала от восторга! Она открылась в 2017 году и стала самой большой кофейней Starbucks в мире, самый настоящий кофейный театр. ☕️На первом этаже посвящено обжарке кофе прямо на месте. На глазах у посетителей сотрудники работают с зе

😍104🔥31

5 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC116 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

😤 Я встретила обезьянку-капуцина и на миг почувствовала себя в фильме «Ночь в музее». Они такие еще шалуны! После всех пеших прогулок по парку и встреч с животными решила немного передохнуть и отправилась на водный круиз к водным животным. 🐵 По пути нам попался остров, окруженный водой, а там обезьянки бегали, прыгали и вели себя как настоящие разбойники. И я приготовилась защищать свои вещи. Но как только лодка

🔥10😁32

5 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC106 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💐 Нам, людям, запретили первыми трогать красных панд. Собеседование проводили они, а не мы. Пока они сами не подойдут, не потрогают нас или даже не обнимут. Потому что они совсем не боятся людей, а вот люди могут случайно навредить им. Я впервые в жизни увидела красную панду. После этого мне очень сложно поверить, что она относится к отряду хищников, это невозможно! 🤭 Она спокойно ест яблоки, валяется, мило умыва

🔥53😍2

4 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC118 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🫤 Панда отказалась со мной знакомиться, даже не повернулась ко всем. Мне было грустно, что я так и не смогла нормально посмотреть на большую панду. Она просто сидела к нам спиной, спокойно жевала бамбук и вообще не собиралась поворачиваться. 😔 В парке была отдельная огромная территория, полностью посвященная пандам. Вокруг толпа людей, пытались хоть что-то разглядеть, сфотографировать, найти тот самый удачный ракур

🔥73😁1

4 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC106 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🦘 Я побоялась покормить большого кенгуру, потому что после всех рассказов из Австралии была уверена: одно движение и он сможет отправить меня в нокаут. Поэтому выбрала маленького, с ним мы быстро нашли общий язык. Они оказались милыми, но ленивыми. Я ожидала, что кенгуру будут постоянно прыгать, носиться и устраивать марафон. А они дремали, валялись, обнимались друг с другом и вели себя почти как кошки. 😭 Если бы

🔥8😍42🤩1

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @Eliora13. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мир Eliora” (@Eliora13), 391 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Eliora13.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.