Channel
@Elineschreibt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
718subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001767820071 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Elineschreibt |
| Created | 27 March 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Elineschreibt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 718 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 712 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 712 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 February 2026 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 379 |
| Reactions total | 30 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
571 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 347 | 60.8% | |
| 🙏 | 77 | 13.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 58 | 10.2% | |
| 🕊 | 32 | 5.60% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 5.43% | |
| 🥰 | 26 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 571reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Elineschreibt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 February 2026 to 20 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
So fremd, so anders, so dachte sie sich, blickte ihr Antlitz, betrachtete sich. Schleichend, nicht rasend, beständig bedacht, stückweise weichend, reißend und sacht... ...bis es das Damals nur schemenhaft gab, schleichend ging etwas, starb und sie ward. So stand sie vorm Selbste, vorm irdischen ich. Ihr Walten ein Anders, ihr Wirken, ihr Blick. Die Haltung war aufrecht, getragen ihr Gang und mit jedem Scheitern, f…
❤25❤🔥4🥰1
💃🏼🤍
❤4
https://t.me/IamFelice Eine wundervolle Künstlerin, die gehört werden darf.
🙏2
Regungslos starrend blickte sie durch die aufsteigenden Nebelschwaden vor ihrem Schlafzimmerfenster. Ihr Bett flüsterte noch von Nächtlichem und der Kaffee dampfte auf ihrem Nachtschrank, erzählte seine Geschichten vom Wachwerden. Ihr Kopf kreiste noch langsam die letzten Runden im Gedankenkarussell und ließ den Zweifel am Ende der letzten Runde aussteigen. Hinter der steigenden Wand der morgentaulichen Verhüllung, …
❤8🥰7🔥3🙏1
Photo, posted without a caption
🕊5❤3🔥1🙏1
"Wie geht´s dir eigentlich?" Eigentlich, welch ungreifbares Wort. Eigentümlich. Wie es mir geht? Naja. "Es geht." Ich gehe. Und das Leben durch mich durch. Mal sanft. Mal brachial. Meist beides zugleich. Doch, es geht. Unermüdlich und unaufhaltsam. Ich untermale meine Antwort mit einem scheuem Lächeln, welches Trauer zu kaschieren versucht. Manche Menschen mögen diese Trauer hinter dem Lächeln erhaschen. Sie seh…
❤32🙏8❤🔥4🔥3🥰2🕊1
Schöpfung Drang ein Tropfen, aus dem Nichts, weitet, wandelt, mehret sich. Dehnend, wachsend, zellerweiternd, geistgebärend, seelewaltend, dringt das All aus Dunkelheit, blickt durch Nebel in das Weit. Fiel ein Tropfen in das Nichts, in das Alles, wurde Ich.
❤🔥11❤8🙏6🕊3
"Wie lange noch, Liebes?", so fragtest du mich. Die Antwort wand schweigend im Unsichtbarblick. So lange, - ja und das sagte ich nicht, so lange bis Leid letztlich groß genug ist. Bis Bleiben zu schwer und Gehen viel leichter, so lange es braucht... ...und ich ging hinkend weiter.
❤21🙏4❤🔥2🔥1🕊1
Ausweglosigkeit ist ein Samen, der aufkeimt, sobald der Zweifel aufhört, sich gegen die Stille aufzulehen. Dann wächst sich das Leben ganz leise in die Welt, bereit die Früchte des Mutes zu tragen. Ich glaube, wenn wir mutig genug sind, ohne Kontrolle, ohne zu wissen wie es ausgeht und wohin es uns führt, dann ebnet sich der Weg unter jedem Schritt den wir gehen und gleichzeitig wird er gesetzt, vom Leben selbst. …
❤24🙏8🕊4❤🔥3🔥2
So sucht sie ihr Glück, in den hintersten Ecken, an keinem der Orte kann sie es entdecken. So jagt sie dem Glück nach, durch Räume, durch Zeiten, sucht in Gesichtern, in flüchtigen Weiten. Labt sich an Quellen, die Durste nur mehren, hält fest die Dinge, die heimlich verzehren. Bis Stille sie trifft. Wie ein ruhender See. Kein Drängen. Kein Wollen. Kein Rennen. Kein Weh. Mit Blick in das Wasser, so ahnt sie alsdan…
❤29❤🔥6🙏6🕊4🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤8
"Was bleibt mir übrig?", so fragte sie sich, als Schmerz ihr als Träne den Augen entwich. "Gibt es ein Wichtig, ein wahrliches Richtig, wer will ich werden und kann ich es sein?" Tausendviel Fragen, die Wut stieg in Schwaden, ebbte in Trauer und freite das Herz. "Nichts ist mehr übrig!", so schrie sie ins Nichts, fühlte doch treibend; das alles, bin ich. Und unter den Fluten aus Trauer und Wut, da sah sie es pran…
🙏16❤🔥13❤7🥰4🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Elineschreibt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,436,519 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eline” (@Elineschreibt), 718 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Elineschreibt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.