Channel
@Elbek_Mamadiyorov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
124subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001806973606 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Elbek_Mamadiyorov |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Elbek_Mamadiyorov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:02 | 124 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 125 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 126 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 127 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 127 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 29 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
418 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5271466005242059956 | 122 | 29.2% | |
| custom 5460850191567429837 | 53 | 12.7% | |
| custom 5463289097336405244 | 44 | 10.5% | |
| ❤ | 36 | 8.61% | |
| 🔥 | 35 | 8.37% | |
| custom 5274140988183420061 | 28 | 6.70% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 4.55% | |
| 🤣 | 17 | 4.07% | |
| 😁 | 16 | 3.83% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 2.87% | |
| 😢 | 12 | 2.87% | |
| 😭 | 12 | 2.87% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 0.957% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 0.957% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 0.478% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.239% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.239% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 418 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2025 to 1 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Elbek_Mamadiyorov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 May 2025 to 1 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Tepadagi postda ham pulli “yulduzlar” (“stars”) reaksiyasi xuddi bayrog’imizdagi kabi 12ta bo’libdi. Balki mustaqilligimizning 34 yilligiga sovg’a sifatida bunisini 34ta qilarmiz )
custom 527146600524205995629custom 52741409881834200619🤣5
Mustaqilligimiz abadiy bo’lsin!
custom 527146600524205995624custom 52741409881834200612
Endi pulli “yulduzlar” (stars) reaksiyasini bosishingiz mumkin. Ushbu postdan boshlab bemalol bosishingiz mumkin ) Tekin versiyasi (AliExpress versiyasi 😁) ham qo’shildi. Bemalol xohlaganingizni ishlating )
custom 546328909733640524444custom 527146600524205995616custom 54608501915674298377custom 52741409881834200616❤1
Hech kim dasturlashni bir kunga hech qanday qiyinchiliklarsiz o'rganib, yuqori daromadli oylik bilan ishga kirish mumkinligini aytmaydi. Havotir olmanglar, men ham aytmayman
🤣12😁7😭4
GPT-5.0 chiqqandan keyin: - Balki hammasini yig’ishtirib, yana lag’monxonaga qaytsammikan )
😢12😁3custom 52741409881834200612custom 54608501915674298372
Video message, posted without a caption
👍12❤6👏6
EduCast'ning navbatdagi sonini kutib oling! 🎙 Podcastimizning bu galgi mehmoni - President Tech Award tanlovida 50 ming AQSh dollari granti sohibi Elbek Mamadiyorov. Bundan tashqari, Elbek Zakovat intellektual o‘yinlari chempioni va ko‘plab hackathonlar g‘olibidir. 🚀Suhbatimiz davomida Elbek tanlov va hackathonlarga tayyorlanish bo'yicha tavsiyalar va tajribalari bilan bo'lishadilar. Shuningdek, qanday qilib o'z g…
🔥8❤5
Qanday qilib Elbek Mamadiyorov “President Tech Award” tanlovida 50 ming AQSH dollari grantni qo‘lga kiritdi? Birinchi mehmonimiz — Elbek Mamadiyorov, yosh dasturchi, Zakovat intellektual o‘yinlari chempioni va ko‘plab hackathonlar g‘olibi. Elbek o‘z innovatsion loyihalari orqali texnologiyalar va yoshlar imkoniyatlarini birlashtirgan holda President Tech Award tanlovida 50 ming AQSH dollari grant yutib, startap yo‘l…
🔥12❤2👍1
Buni sizlar bilan bo‘lishishdan xursandman (I am happy to share with you) : Hayot faqat g‘alabalardan iborat emas. Ba’zida bor kuchingni berib ishlaysan. Ishonasan. Taqdimot qilasan. Ammo bu safar g‘olib bo‘lmaysan. Men O‘zbekiston bo‘ylab tanlab olingan 100 nafar ishtirokchidan biri sifatida School 21da o‘tkazilgan Tech for Ecology xakatonida ishtirok etdim. G‘olib bo‘lmadik. Ammo men yutdim: 🔹 Yangi tanishuvla…
🔥8👍2
Qurbon hayiti muborak bo‘lsin, qadrdonlarim! 👍
🤝4❤2👍2🕊1
Sizlar uchun maxsus, jahon chempionati kubogini reaksiyaga qo’shdim. Bilselar bilarsila ). #Yaxshi_niyatda_endi )
custom 546085019156742983744😁4
Hammani tabriklayman birodarlar, ancha kutilgan va bo’lishi kerak bo’lgan ish bo’ldi. Endi jahon chempionatida ham Alloh yuzimizni yorug’ qilsin.
custom 52714660052420599567❤2🕊2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Elbek_Mamadiyorov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Bugun nima bo’ladi deb o’ylaysiz?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2025 to 1 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Elbek | Blog” (@Elbek_Mamadiyorov), 124 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Elbek_Mamadiyorov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.