Channel
@Eileenty
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
46subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003827219653 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Eileenty |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 7 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Eileenty |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 46 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 46 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (7 June 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 487 |
| Reactions total | 34 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
147 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5309877826210513983 | 49 | 33.3% | |
| custom 5294541202371133866 | 39 | 26.5% | |
| custom 5233432570892401696 | 35 | 23.8% | |
| custom 5418021013914927785 | 15 | 10.2% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 2.72% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 2.04% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 1.36% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ОТКРЫВАЮ ПРЕДЗАКАЗ До 07.08 Брелок с никой - 400 рублей Брелок с Солом и Реном - 350 рублей Иии стенд с Раккой - 450 рублей Предоплата, доставка за ваш счёт Самовывоз по Уфе и Набережных Челнах Доставка озон, вб, СДЭК, авито Отправка брелочков где то в конце августа/начало сентября А стенд буду заказывать с Китая так что в сентябре Лс-@Da68j
😇1custom 52334325708924016961custom 53098778262105139831
Первый день фестиваля прошёл прекрасно, если не учитывать невыносимую жару Все акрил брелки скупили, кроме ники ( Фоткала винор
custom 54180210139149277857custom 52945412023711338663custom 52334325708924016962custom 53098778262105139831
Кстати на счет брелков Я заказала с Алика пока что пробные, не знаю зайдет ли, однако буду продавать их на фатуи Возможно, позже открою предзаказы и закажу уже большую партию
custom 53098778262105139832custom 52945412023711338661
Что вы предпочтёте больше всего из новинок?
The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
custom 53098778262105139831
Кто то шарит за Я, ты и она?
custom 53098778262105139834custom 52334325708924016961custom 52945412023711338661
Представляем вам следующего участника Аллеи авторов - Eileen!✨ Eileen - творческая личность, её работы сочетают в себе нежные кружева и таинственные элементы, такие как маленькие зубы. Она создаёт открытки, которые пахнут пыльным чердаком и таят в себе особую атмосферу. На столике вас ждут декоративные аксессуары и открытки, вдохновлён эстетикой morute и angelcore. Обязательно посетите его!🤍 Соц. сети: Тгк 💬 Оста…
custom 53098778262105139834custom 52334325708924016962custom 52945412023711338662
𖦹 ҒᎡᎪΝ ᏴϴᏔ 𖦹 В наличии •формат А5 •матовое покрытие •цена 150 рублей ᨏᨐᨓ ◈ ᨓᨐᨏ #продажа #мерч #френбоу #наклейки
custom 52334325708924016969custom 53098778262105139834🕊1custom 54180210139149277851
Любите Микан? ᨶ႒ᩚ •.:°✙═════════✙°:.• #микан #значки #принт #продажа #мерч #минипост
custom 52945412023711338663custom 53098778262105139833
Решила попробовать что то похоже на декоративные коробочки Навряд ли конечно они пойдут в продажу
custom 52945412023711338667custom 53098778262105139832custom 54180210139149277852🕊1custom 52334325708924016961
ᎬᏆᏞᎬᎬΝ pinned a photo
С ярмарки остались два значка Продаю их по скидке за 150 рублей шт 𓏲 Самовывоз по Уфе •┈┈┈•┈┈┈•┈┈
🕊2custom 52334325708924016962custom 53098778262105139832custom 52945412023711338661custom 54180210139149277851
Обзор на столик౨ৎ
custom 52945412023711338666custom 53098778262105139834🙏3custom 52334325708924016962custom 54180210139149277851
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Eileenty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что вы предпочтёте больше всего из новинок?
The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 648,689 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᎬᏆᏞᎬᎬΝ” (@Eileenty), 46 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Eileenty.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.