Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for EduJourney👩‍🏫

Channel

EduJourney👩‍🏫

@EduJourneey

Not marked by Telegram, checked 15 September 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

929subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002185884715
TypeChannel
Username@EduJourneey
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/EduJourneey

Growth

926929927.59 September 2026 — 926 subscribers9 September 2026 — 926 subscribers11 September 2026 — 927 subscribers19 September 2026 — 929 subscribers9 September 202619 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 926–929 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 01:21929+2
11 Sept 2026, 14:41927+1
9 Sept 2026, 05:22926no change
9 Sept 2026, 04:47926first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.4%
avg views ÷ 929 subscribers
Avg views / post
162
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held20 (28 August 20267 September 2026)
Views total3,070
Reactions total40
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 05:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3177.5%
👍922.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Sept 2026, 08:52 UTC93 viewsread 9 September 2026
Voice message

اگه گفتید بچها دارن چیکار میکنن که کلاس انقدر درهمه؟

30 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC214 viewsread 9 September 2026

دوست دارم نظراتتونو تو کامنتا بدونم

30 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC217 viewsread 9 September 2026

بقیه‌ی ناشناس ها رو یه روز دیگه بزارم توی کانال. امروز خیلی صحبت شد❤️

30 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC220 views5 reactionsread 9 September 2026

در صورت عدم انجام هم بچها با چندتا مورد روبرو میشن: 🌈از سمت مدرس سرزنش میشن و جلوی دوستاشون خجالت میکشن. 🌈بچهایی که تکلیف انجام دادن یه تشویقی کوچیک مثل ستاره میگیرن و اونا نمیگیرن. 🌈توی ازمون ها نمرات پایین تری کسب میکنن. مدرس اینجا یادآور میشه که این نمره نتیجه‌ی تلاش کم و انجام ندادن تکالیفه. 🌈با توجه به شرایط کلاس اگه تایم دارید ده دقیقه‌ی اخر کلاس ازشون بخواید که تکالیف رو بنویسن و با بچهایی که تکالیف رو نوشتن

4👍1

30 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC190 views3 reactionsread 9 September 2026

برای کودک هم من سعی میکنم این کارها رو انجام بدم: اولا که والدین مهمترین نقش رو در این زمینه دارن. سعی میکنم اول ترم براشون یه جلسه‌ی توجیهی بزارم و روند کلاس و نقش والدین در زمینه‌ی تکالیف رو توضیح بدم. میزان تکالیف رو با توجه به میزان زمان ازاد بچها و تواناییشون انتخاب میکنم پیشنهاد میکنم که همه‌ی تکالیف رو با هم انجام ندن. هر روز یه بخش از تکالیف و بین همون ها هم زمان استراحت داشته باشن. روتین در منزل بسیار

2👍1

30 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC164 views3 reactionsread 9 September 2026

در این زمینه رنج سنی خیلی مهمه بنظرم من روز اول با زبان اموز بزرگسال یا حتی گاها نوجوان اتمام حجت میکنم و میگم من مبصر شما نیستم. شما با توجه به هدفتون ثبت نام کردید توی کلاس و عدم انجام تکالیف هم این مشکلات رو به همراه داره.‌ حالا با توجه به این موارد خودتون تصمیم بگیرید که چه کاری دوست دارید انجام بدید. و واقعا هم میپذیرم اگه زبان اموز بزرگسالم برام توضیح بده و نخواد تکلیف انجام بده. بزرگسال معمولا شاغله. مسئولیتا

👍3

30 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC134 views2 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @HarfChatBot

‌ بچه‌های الان اصلا براشون مهم نیست که با تکلیف ننوشتن ازشون نمره کم بشه، یاد نگیرن یا هرچیز دیگه. من هر روشی که بگید رو چشم بسته میگم امتحان کردم ولی باز هم 🤦🏻

👍2

30 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC149 views4 reactionsread 9 September 2026

پیشنهاد های من چیه؟ 🎈اولا فعالیت ها رو کوتاه در نظر بگیریم و به attention span زبان اموزان توجه کنیم. 🎈فعالیت ها رو طوری در نظر بگیریم که همه‌ی زبان اموزان در کلاس درگیر( engage) بشن. مثلا موقعی که یکی از بچها داره صحبت میکنه از بقیه بخوایم ۳ تا کلمه از حرفاش رو بنویسن اینطوری احتمال حواس پرتی کمتر میشه. 🎈همیشه به بچها تسک بدیم و مشغول نگهشون داریم. مثلا وقتی یه فیلم یا کارتون پلی میکنیم ازشون بخوایم چندتا کلمه که

3👍1

30 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC120 views5 reactionsread 9 September 2026

حالا چه باید کرد؟ اولین کاری که باید بکنیم اینه که برچسب ADHD رو از روی بچها برداریم. چرا انقدر مهمه؟ به طور کل برچسب زدن یعنی سلب مسئولیت از زبان اموز یعنی دادن این سیگنال که دیگه امکان تغییر وجود نداره. من با زبان اموز بیش فعال چه میتونم بکنم؟ من که دکتر نیستم. پس اگه بپذیریم که لزوما هر زبان اموزی که علائم بی فعالی داره بیش فعال نیست نصف راهو رفتیم.

5

30 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC120 views5 reactionsread 9 September 2026

من از خودم مثال میزنم من سالهاست که با مشکل عدم توجه و تمرکز و حافظه‌ی ضعیف دست و پنجه نرم میکنم. همیشه معلم هام از این مسئله شاکی بودن. بارها شده بود مامانم منو فرستاده بود نون بخرم رفته بودم بیرون یادم رفته بود چی باید بخرم. با پولم یه بستنی میخریدم برمیگشتم 😂 هنوزم گاهی سر کلاس حرفام رو نصفه یادم میره یا یهو زل میزنم به یه جایی میرم تو فکر. اگه همه چیز رو یادداشت نکنم اصلا یادم نمیمونه چیکار کردم و تکلیف چی دادم ب

5

30 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC115 views3 reactionsread 9 September 2026

در مورد مسائل روان هم همینطوره دوستان این مسئله که کم توجهی یه معضل شده توش شکی نیست. اما ایا واقعا همه‌ی مشکلات تمرکز، مشکلات حافظه، بی قراری ها و شیطنت های بچها لزوما نشونه‌ی ADHD هست؟ معلومه که نه من واقعا نمیدونم که این مشکلات جدید هستن یا همیشه وجود داشتن چون من به نسل های قبلی آموزش ندادم. اما میدونم که مسائل زیادی روی این عدم توجه و تمرکز تاثیر دارن

2👍1

30 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC117 viewsread 9 September 2026

اول یه سوال دارم اگه یه نفر بگه من معده درد دارم ایا اولین برداشت ما اینه که حتما سرطان معده گرفتی؟ اگه یه نفر بگه سرم درد میکنه سریع بهش میگیم واای وای میگرن گرفتی؟ ایا ما میتونیم بر اساس یک دو یا اصلا ده تا علامت یک بیماری رو در یک فرد تشخیص بدیم؟

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EduJourneey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

رواق / Ravaq
@ravaq_pod · 29,514
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EduJourney👩‍🏫” (@EduJourneey), 929 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EduJourneey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.