Channel name was changed to ««• Эдиторы. Реванш •» ЗАВЕРШЁН»

Channel
«• Эдиторы. Реванш •» ЗАВЕРШЁН
@EditorsRevenge
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
159subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002929723104 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EditorsRevenge |
| Description | • Ребята из after effects будут бороться за звание лучшего Эдитора. •Лицом к лицу, столкнутся 9 ребят, чей монтаж является самым крутым! Следи за своим любимым Эдитором, ведь каждый голос будет решать его судьбу! |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EditorsRevenge |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 159 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 159 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 152
- Videos
- 140
- Links
- 100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
317 reactions across 15 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 60 | 18.9% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 11.4% | |
| 😭 | 26 | 8.20% | |
| 💋 | 23 | 7.26% | |
| 💘 | 22 | 6.94% | |
| 🤡 | 22 | 6.94% | |
| 👎 | 21 | 6.62% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 5.99% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 3.79% | |
| 🤮 | 12 | 3.79% | |
| 🖕 | 11 | 3.47% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 3.47% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 2.52% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 1.89% | |
| 🤬 | 6 | 1.89% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 1.26% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 1.26% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.946% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 0.946% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 0.631% | |
| 6 further kinds | 6 | 1.89% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 317reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 17 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Уважаемые Эдиторы и гости проекта "Эдиторы.Реванш". Вот и наступил тот момент, когда эта битва подошла к своему логическому завершению, поэтому хочется сказать следующее.. 🟢Я не отрицаю того факта, что второй сезон вышел очень сырым, моментами пустой и непонятный, ведь за все время было около 4х смен участников и найти замену в короткие сроки практически невозможно; ссоры и уходы, которые также сказывались на продук…
🔥3💘2💯2
Хочу сказать про каждого немного: 🌟 vvitch. Это были незабываемые ощущения от твоих атмосферных работ, надеюсь, что в будущем у тебя будет намного больше времени и ты сможешь доказать кто здесь сильнейший, всех благ тебе🫶 🌟 xbitwa.com. Пусть ты и закончил свой путь Эдиторства за шаг до финала, но ты показывал невероятный результат своими работами! Надеюсь, что все у тебя будет хорошо и мы не раз увидим твои Эдиты 🫶…
❤🔥8🔥6😭6💘2❤1
Я люблю всех, абсолютно всех без исключения. извините, если кого-то обидел или ваши ожидания не оправдались 🙏 Мы познакомились друг с другом, мы узнали многое и надеюсь, что дальнейшее общение будет приятным и оно впринципе продолжится! ‼️ Пусть в жизни каждого из вас начнутся самые приятные перемены, я верю в каждого из вас, я ценю каждого из вас, надеюсь, что у всех все будет хорошо 🫶 — До скорых встреч, мои хор…
😭10💘6🔥4❤🔥3💋1
Зрительские голоса принесли участникам: ryder0awe — 82 реакции Verty — 111 реакций moncrystae — 166 реакций rozetkaae — 213 реакций Поздравляем финалистов и победителя!
❤🔥10💯6🔥5
ПЕРВОЕ МЕСТО ЗАНИМАЕТ — АНЯ ROZETKAAE
❤🔥16💋11💘9🤡5❤3👎3🤮3🔥2
И она доказала всем, что ничем не уступает остальным!
🥰5❤🔥4🔥4💋3
На протяжении всей битвы она получала не самые высокие оценки и находилась внизу таблицы, но жюри дало ей шанс, посчитав достойной финала!
💋5❤🔥3🔥3🥰3❤2🍓1🕊1🤗1
И, наконец, первое место с большим отрывом в голосовании занимает участница, чей путь на проекте оказался по-настоящему непростым
❤🔥7❤6🔥6🤮3🥰2👎1💋1💩1
Почётное второе место занимает — Алина moncrystae
🤣8👎6🤬5❤4💯2🔥2🤮2👍1
Она создаёт работы в своём уникальном стиле, с особой изюминкой, и на протяжении всего проекта достойно конкурировала в зрительских голосованиях, не уступая никому!
👎6🤡4🤮4❤🔥2💋2💩2👍1🖕1
Но, к сожалению, участнице, занявшей второе место, так и не удалось вырвать победу..
🎉3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EditorsRevenge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 908,564 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“«• Эдиторы. Реванш •» ЗАВЕРШЁН” (@EditorsRevenge), 159 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EditorsRevenge.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.