Channel
@EdiPooo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
160subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002877571153 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EdiPooo |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EdiPooo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 160 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 158 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 741 |
| Reactions total | 110 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
110 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5334678084069138187 | 37 | 33.6% | |
| custom 5456559033907454758 | 27 | 24.5% | |
| custom 5332708566686016474 | 13 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5301245521766151505 | 12 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5404669944866564930 | 8 | 7.27% | |
| custom 5283231140436523985 | 7 | 6.36% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 2.73% | |
| custom 5472173464821439380 | 2 | 1.82% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.909% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Любимого прям нет , но нравятся Kris Fillips/Rew Ewa/Банка Ягод/Elizveri Отношусь отлично!!! Общаться бы хотел с Банкой
custom 53346780840691381873🍓1custom 54046699448665649301custom 54565590339074547581
🥰 У тебя новое сообщение! Кто ваш любимый косплеер из Миасса? Как относитесь к ним и с кем хотели бы подружиться ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
custom 54046699448665649302custom 53327085666860164741custom 54565590339074547581
Огурец Комуши не балуйся
custom 53346780840691381872custom 54565590339074547581
💖 У тебя новое сообщение! Огурец или огурец? ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
custom 54565590339074547582custom 53327085666860164741custom 54046699448665649301
Смотрю наверное лет так с 8-9 когда только по телевизору крутили А на счет косплеев то в планах безликий и хаку
custom 53346780840691381872custom 52832311404365239851custom 54046699448665649301
💗 У тебя новое сообщение! Как давно смотрите искусство Хаяо Миядзаки и какие косплеи вотжтой франшизе хотите сделать ещё? ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
custom 54565590339074547582custom 53012455217661515051custom 53327085666860164741
Эдди 🌟
custom 53346780840691381873custom 53327085666860164741custom 54565590339074547581
💒 У тебя новое сообщение! Любимый персонаж из ангела кровопролития? ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
custom 53346780840691381873custom 53327085666860164741custom 54046699448665649301
Меня честно очень убивают шипи от туда Любимые:РамПо[моя римская империя] , Акутагава/Хигучи, Дзено/Тетто , Маргарет/Натаниэль , Рембо/Верлен , Луиза/Фицджеральд , Куникила/Брем[меня запинают] , Дазай/Официантка
custom 52832311404365239853custom 53327085666860164741custom 54565590339074547581
💕 У тебя новое сообщение! Как относитесь к шипам в бсд? И какие любимые? ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
custom 54565590339074547582custom 53327085666860164741custom 54046699448665649301
Ура Спасибо, я польщён
custom 53346780840691381874custom 53012455217661515051custom 53327085666860164741custom 54565590339074547581
💖 У тебя новое сообщение! Я думал вы из Москвы 😭 ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
custom 53346780840691381873custom 53012455217661515051custom 53327085666860164741custom 54565590339074547581
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EdiPooo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 356,974 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🕯️愛✟𝓚𝓷𝓲𝔃𝓱𝓷𝔂𝔂 𝓔𝓭𝓲 ✟愛🕯️/книжный Эди” (@EdiPooo), 160 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EdiPooo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.