Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CHANGE | ๐–ค๐–ฝ๐–พ๐—‡

@Edengrouppgirl

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

47subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004339096818
TypeChannel
Username@Edengrouppgirl
DescriptionะŸะพ ะฒะพะฟั€ะพัะฐะผ - @TribleY4N CHANGE Girl Group by EDEN ENTERTAINMENT
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 28 July 2026โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Edengrouppgirl

Growth

479 Aug 2026, 10:15 โ€” 47 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 13:46 โ€” 47 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 10:1510 Aug 2026, 13:46
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 46โ€“48 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 13:4647no change
9 Aug 2026, 10:1547first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
91.9%
avg views รท 47 subscribers
Avg views / post
43.2
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.3%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held11 (28 July 2026 โ€“ 10 August 2026)
Views total475
Reactions total34
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
92
Videos
68
Links
20

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโ€™s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 38s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐ŸŒš1029.4%
โค720.6%
๐Ÿ“411.8%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ38.82%
๐ŸŽ‰38.82%
๐Ÿ’˜38.82%
โšก25.88%
๐Ÿ’‹12.94%
๐Ÿ’ฏ12.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC12 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#bubble update _ ๐Ÿ—ฏ โ€ข 10.08.26 - dยชte โ€ข (๐Ÿฐ ่‰พ ) - hi ๐Ÿ˜ฝ (Change bubble) #CHANGE | #EDEN | #KIKI

๐ŸŽ‰2โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐ŸŒš1๐Ÿ“1๐Ÿ’‹1๐Ÿ’ฏ1

6 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC41 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#bubble update _ ๐Ÿ—ฏ โ€ข 06.08.26 - dยชte โ€ข (๐ŸŒธ ่‰พ ) - ๐Ÿฅบ (Change bubble) #CHANGE | #EDEN | #EL

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐ŸŒš2โšก1๐Ÿ“1

5 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC16 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @EdenEntOffPhoto

๐ŸชฆThe ๐Ÿญst mini album๐Ÿชฆ ๐Ÿ—๐Ÿ”‡ "๐—œ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ผ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ"๐Ÿชฆ CHANGE ๐Ÿฅน EDEN ๐Ÿชฆ๐Ÿชฆ๐Ÿชฆ๐Ÿชฆ๐Ÿชฆ{๐Ÿค}๐Ÿชฆ๐Ÿชฆ #EDEN | #CHANGE | #ALBUM

๐ŸŒš3โค2

4 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC99 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#bubble update _ ๐Ÿ—ฏ โ€ข 04.08.26 - dยชte โ€ข (๐Ÿข่‰พ ) - MMMMBITCH (Change bubble) #CHANGE | #EDEN | #NATSU

โค3๐ŸŒš2๐Ÿ“2

2 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC76 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#bubble update _ ๐Ÿ—ฏ โ€ข 02.08.26 - dยชte โ€ข (๐Ÿฆข ่‰พ ) - ๐Ÿ‘€ (Change bubble) #CHANGE | #EDEN | #MITSU

โค2๐ŸŒš2โšก1๐ŸŽ‰1

28 Jul 2026, 21:05 UTC58 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @apeironrri_officialPhoto

โŠน เฃช ห– 290726 ` ; ๐”…๐—Ž๐–ป๐–ป๐—…๐–พ ๐”˜๐—‰๐–ฝ๐–บ๐—๐–พ ๐ŸฆŠ โ€” with Lana (ROSELINE) and ะบั‚ะพ ัั‚ะพ (CHANGE) ๐“ฒึผ แฅซแญก โ‚Š โŠน ห‘ ึดึถ ๐“‚ƒ @apeironrri_official

๐Ÿ’˜3

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Edengrouppgirl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 1,135,863 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œCHANGE | ๐–ค๐–ฝ๐–พ๐—‡โ€ (@Edengrouppgirl), 47 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Edengrouppgirl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.