Channel
@Econews_24
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
70,836subscribers
+4,577 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001417876765 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Econews_24 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Econews_24 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 70,836 | -163 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 70,999 | -858 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 71,857 | -795 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 72,652 | -1,099 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 73,751 | +5,088 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 68,663 | +4,578 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:58 | 64,085 | -284 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 64,369 | -285 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 64,654 | -192 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:41 | 64,846 | -645 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 65,491 | -383 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 65,874 | -385 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 66,259 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 66,259 | first reading |
104 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 104 (3 August 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 346,452 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
📌طعنه جالب خبرنگار ارشد المانیتور به وعده تحریمهای شدیدتر علیه ایران توسط ترامپ! 🔹️ما کاری انجام میدهیم تا مجبور نشویم دوباره به تشدید نظامی روی بیاوریم (عمدتاً به این خاطر که موشکهای رهگیرمان تمام شده، و شاید هم تشدید نظامی جواب نمی دهد) @Econews_24
📌قیمت داروهای سرماخوردگی نجومی شد! @Econews_24
📌بدهی ملی آمریکا از ۴۰ تریلیون دلار عبور کرد! @Econews_24
📌همتی: تا کنون هیچ پولی از مبالغ بلوکه شده آزاد نشده/ محدودیتهای شدید ارزی و درآمدی را مدیریت میکنیم! رئیس بانک مرکزی: 🔹️محدودیتهای درآمدی ناشی از کاهش صادرات نفت، موضوعی فراگیر است که برخی کشورهای همسایه مانند قطر و عراق را نیز درگیر کرده است. 🔹️با این حال، تمایز اصلی ایران با سایر کشورها در عدم دسترسی به ذخایر ارزی بهدلیل مسدودسازی آنها توسط ایالات متحده آمریکا است. 🔹️با وجود آنکه شرایط فعلی اقتصاد کشور نس…
📌ارز ترجیحی را حذف نمیکردند، اجناس اینقدر گران نمیشد/ پزشکیان توسط مشاورانش اغفال شد! کاوه زرگران رئیس کمیسیون کشاورزی و صنایع تبدیلی اتاق بازرگانی: 🔹️مشکلات کنونی کشور اصلا ربطی به جنگ و محاصره دریایی ندارد و حاصل سیاستهای اقتصادی دولت است. 🔹️با بکاربردن کلماتی مثل "قحطی" و "محاصره دریایی" میخواهند کاستیها و اشتباهاتشان را توجیه کنند! @Econews_24
📌معاون مرکز پژوهشها: ادعای کسری ۱۵ میلیون لیتر بنزین غلط است! 🔹️با افزایش تولید بنزین از ابتدای سال تقریبا در مرداد ۲ تا ۳ میلیون لیتر در روز کسری داشتهایم. @Econews_24
📌نایب رییس کمیسیون اقتصادی مجلس: افزایش ناگهانی قیمت بنزین تبعات زیادی دارد! 🔹قبول داریم قیمت بنزین فعلی معقول نیست؛ اما چون از سال ۹۸ هیچ اصلاحی صورت نگرفته، افزایش یکدفعهای قیمت بنزین تبعات زیادی دارد. قیمت بنزین باید بهصورت تدریجی افزایش یابد @Econews_24
📌راغفر: ظریف و روحانی میخواهند مملکت را بفروشند! حسین راغفر، استاد تمام اقتصاد: 🔹️صلح شرافتمندانهای که خاتمی حرفش را میزند به معنای تسلیم شدن است. 🔹️پزشکیان با مطرح کردن "قحطی" میخواهد سیاست اشتباه حذف ارز ترجیحی را توجیه کند. 🔹️حرفهای رئیسجمهور درباره جلوگیری از قحطی یعنی ما کالاها را گران کردیم که مردم نتوانند آن را بخرند، این چه حرفیست؟! 🔹️چرا کشور سیستم سهمیهبندی متناسب با شرایط جنگی ندارد؟ امروز برعک…
📌آقای قالیباف ! جنگ شناختی یا جنگ با رسانه ملی؟ 🔹رییس مجلس شورای اسلامی امروز روزشان را به توصیه مشاوران با حمله به صداوسیما آغاز کردند و گفتند «در توطئه جدید دشمن، جنگ شناختی کلیدیترین نقش را بازی میکند و نقش رسانه ملی بیش از هر زمان دیگر است اما متاسفانه تاکنون موفقیتهای لازم را نداشتهاست.» 🔹سوال این است چرا رسانه ملی اینگونه مورد هجمه همزمان دشمنان و برخی از مسئولین داخلی کشور قرار گرفته است؟ 🔹پاسخ روشن ا…
📌جبرائیلی: کرمان، عملیات فریب بود؛ بنزین: فعلا ۳۰ هزار تومان! @Econews_24
📌دولت خانوادگی! 🔹️همسر عراقچی رئیس انجمن دیپلماتیک بانوان!، وضعیت صادرات غیرنفتی و تجارت خارجی کشور را بررسی و رهنمودهای لازم را صادر کرد. @Econews_24
📌ارزش کالابرگ نصف شد! @Econews_24
Showing the 12 most recent of 104 posts we hold for @Econews_24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اکونیوز | Econews” (@Econews_24), 70,836 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Econews_24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.