Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ecologistas Huesca

@EcologistasHuesca

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

102subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001066924925
TypeChannel
Username@EcologistasHuesca
DescriptionInformación y actividades de las asambleas locales de Ecologistas en Acción en la provincia de Huesca
CreatedBetween 1 April 2016 and 30 April 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/EcologistasHuesca

Growth

1025 August 2026 — 102 subscribers9 August 2026 — 102 subscribers5 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 101–103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 10:00102no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:55102first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.2%
avg views ÷ 102 subscribers
Avg views / post
39.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held20 (21 May 202628 July 2026)
Views total39
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
977
Videos
55
Links
1,600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 11s
Average length
1m 11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
952.9%
👍423.5%
😢211.8%
👏15.88%
🔥15.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 17:06 UTC74 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

POR LA REAPERTURA DE LA LÍNEA INTERNACIONAL DEL CANFRANC 🚇 La Coordinadora para la Reapertura del Ferrocarril Canfranc-Olorón (CREFCO) y el CRELOC celebran su concentración anual este domingo 19 de julio. El objetivo es exigir el impulso definitivo a la conexión ferroviaria entre España y Francia. Apunta esta cita: ✅ Domingo, 19 de julio, 12,00 h. ✅ En la explanada de la estación de Canfranc. ✅ Convocan CREFCO (d

29 Jun 2026, 10:30 UTC116 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Decenas de personas marchan contra el festival Sizigia por su vínculo con el colonialismo israelí y su impacto ambiental https://arainfo.org/marchan-contra-el-festival-sizigia/

1👍1

25 Jun 2026, 08:30 UTC109 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

¿Tienes entre 18 y 30 años? ¡Mira qué planazo! 👉🏾 "Construyendo futuro. Vivir con menos para vivir mejor", un campo de trabajo que Ecologistas en Acción organizamos en Aineto (Huesca). Inscripciones hasta el 30 de junio 👉🏾 https://www.ecologistasenaccion.org/372286/huesca-campos-de-trabajo-de-aineto-jovenes-de-18-a-30-anos/

🔥1

24 Jun 2026, 10:34 UTC56 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @arainfoPhoto

Las ciudades son una sauna: “Necesitamos más árboles y más adaptación frente a las olas de calor”: https://arainfo.org/?p=330792 👉 Ecologistas en Acción y la Alianza por la Emergencia Climática de Aragón se suman a la campaña europea “Cities Not Saunas” para denunciar la falta de adaptación climática de las ciudades de Uesca y Zaragoza.

1

23 Jun 2026, 11:11 UTC69 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

BISCARRUES, NO 🗣🗣 Vuelven a oirse voces en la derecha y ultraderecha que gobierna Aragón, reclamando el retorno del embalse de Biscarrués, un proyecto que el Tribunal Supremo tumbó definitivamente en 2020. Una vez más, Ecologistas en Acción nos unimos a quienes en el territorio, las organizaciones medioambientales y sociales, o la alcaldesa de Biscarrués, Lola Giménez, recuerdan la oposición radical a esta obra po

1👍1

19 Jun 2026, 10:14 UTC88 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://www.ecologistasenaccion.org/371851/en-memoria-de-mariano-polanco/

😢2

19 Jun 2026, 09:11 UTC83 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Tremendo dolor por la pérdida de Mariano Polanco. Un auténtico referente y compañero en la defensa de la naturaleza de Aragón. Histórico en la lucha de Inquinosa, siempre defendiendo sus amadas montañas y Pirineo. Abrazo enorme a la familia. Que la tierra te sea leve compañero

3

19 Jun 2026, 06:28 UTC73 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ecozgzPhoto

INFORME "BEBIENDO MIERDA POR CULPA DE LAS MACROGRANJAS Y LA GANADERÍA INDUSTRIAL" 💩💩 Este no es un titular para llamar la atención, literalmente estamos bebiendo agua que debería de ser "potable" pero que esta contaminada con nitratos procedentes de la agricultura y la ganadería industrial. Según el informe ‘Bebiendo mierda‘ de Ecologistas en Acción, un estudio que analiza los datos oficiales de contaminación del

11 Jun 2026, 11:52 UTC97 viewsread 9 August 2026

Y esto ¿es legal? 😡El festival Sizigia (que se realiza en La Sotonera, espacio protegido como ZEPA, y que blanquea el genocidio del gobierno israelí) sigue vendiendo entradas sin contar con la autorización preceptiva del INAGA https://arainfo.org/el-festival-sizigia-sigue-vendiendo-entradas-sin-contar-con-la-autorizacion-preceptiva-del-inaga/

29 May 2026, 13:37 UTC163 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Nuestro compañero Agustin Montero ha intervenido hoy en la Junta General de Accionistas de Iberdrola, preguntando a su presidente, Ignacio Galán, sobre la apuesta de la compañía por alargar la vida de centrales nucleares envejecidas como Almaraz, pese al calendario de cierre acordado. Además, hemos exigido respuestas sobre: ⚠️ Los riesgos económicos, climáticos y sociales de la energía nuclear. ⚠️ Quién asumirá r

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EcologistasHuesca. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 648,370 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ecologistas Huesca” (@EcologistasHuesca), 102 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EcologistasHuesca.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.