Channel
@E_Milutin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
90subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001300675806 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @E_Milutin |
| Description | Евгений Милютин |
| Created | 8 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/E_Milutin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 90 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 90 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (7 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 237 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
6 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Чтобы справиться с легким когнитивным диссонансом: 100, 33 и 20, это количество стран, которые в основном импортируют свои товары из, соответственно, Китая, США и Германии. То есть, это карта глобальной торговой власти. Диаграмма составлена на основе данных OEC Мир, Комтрейд ООН, и МВФ за 2024 год без учета импорта услуг (только товары). С транзакционными услугами картинка сильно изменилась бы в пользу США. Поражае…
✏️Прочитал у одного автора, что простое происхождение, дескать, гарантирует от предательства, а всякие там уроки французского, напротив, способствуют. Драматург Александр Островский по этому поводу заметил: "А вам и не предлагают!" (Предавать) Но есть ли в таком пассивном непредательстве момент героизма?
💳 Что делать, если отправили деньги мошенникам: 5 шагов, которые помогут быстро вернуть свои кровные Помните, мошенники умеют подбирать ключи к любому: инженеру, профессору, силовику. Чувствовать стыд, злость, опустошение - это абсолютно нормально. Но сейчас не время себя корить. Выдохните, возьмите себя в руки и включите холодный расчет. У вас есть реальный шанс все исправить, и он прямо перед вами - главное, не уп…
✅ Президент Мин Аун Хлайн встретился с кандидатами, один из которых станет первым мьянманским космонавтом. Президент в ходе встречи отметил, что кандидаты успешно прошли отбор по теоретическим знаниям, практическому опыту и медицинским показателям. Они освоили навыки работы в космосе, знания и космические технологии. Глава государства выразил гордость за то, что вскоре у Мьянмы появится свой космонавт. В феврале 20…
Агату Эдуардовну хачу! https://t.me/svezhesti/169592
😱2
Иск о снятии Яблока с выборов будет рассмотрен 10 августа — Верховный суд РФ. @bankrollo
Один мой хороший знакомый, много сделавший для нашей страны, имен не назову, как говорится, залетел на одной модели. Она от него родила и уже собиралась воспользоваться "правом почвы". Но не тут то было. У знакомого нашлась умная жена, которая собрала в охапку мужа, его миллионы и в одночасье они опять стали россиянами. Интересно, имеет ли закон Трампа обратную силу? Все-таки дом в Майями счастливой российской семье …
«Яблоко» дистанцировалось от кампании в свою поддержку из-за границы 💬 В последние дни „Яблоко“ решили публично в соцсетях поддержать те, чья поддержка в нынешних условиях может привести к снятию нашей партии с выборов 💬, — написал в своем обращении на сайте «Яблока» председатель партии Николай Рыбаков. Он заявил, что у «Яблока» нет иностранных источников финансирования и связей с организациями, признанными «нежела…
🇪🇺Евросоюз заявил о полной поддержке Испании. Вот и всё, Беня.
Когда столько всего повидал на своем веку. https://t.me/bankrollo/64596
😁1
Оказывается, валить "Яблоко" начали из-за рубежа. Оно и неудивительно. "Яблоко" многим закрыло путь в оппозицию. За это партию и ценят власти.
😁1
Пенсионер расплатился с мошенниками познавательными газетами и журналами. https://t.me/mosnow/81754
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @E_Milutin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“E_Milutin” (@E_Milutin), 90 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/E_Milutin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.