Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ETABS-Ghahramani

Channel

ETABS-Ghahramani

@ETABS_Ghahramani

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,956subscribers

+122 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001139017783
TypeChannel
Username@ETABS_Ghahramani
DescriptionStructural engineering:A gift to humanity Did you know that ETABS has defined the skyline of almost every major city in the world? 💻$17504 Software ارتباط با ادمین : @FGhahramani تدریس ETABS-بتن،زلزله، کنترلر پایه ارشد سازه - کارشناس رسمی دادگستری
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ETABS_Ghahramani

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,8336,9636,8986 August 2026 — 6,834 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,834 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,833 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,844 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,867 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,875 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,867 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,875 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,885 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,888 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,890 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,899 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,907 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,908 subscribers28 September 2026 — 6,924 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,932 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,939 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,936 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,938 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,949 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,950 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,956 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,963 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,958 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,956 subscribers6,9566 August 20264 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net +122. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,814–6,983 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 21:406,956-2
1 Nov 2026, 23:196,958-5
30 Oct 2026, 07:496,963+7
27 Oct 2026, 04:186,956+6
24 Oct 2026, 09:156,950+1
21 Oct 2026, 17:186,949+11
18 Oct 2026, 13:066,938+2
15 Oct 2026, 18:306,936-3
12 Oct 2026, 19:276,939+7
6 Oct 2026, 01:226,932+8
28 Sept 2026, 18:156,924+16
19 Sept 2026, 01:576,908+1
14 Sept 2026, 11:366,907+8
5 Sept 2026, 22:406,899+9
1 Sept 2026, 17:046,890+2
29 Aug 2026, 18:156,888+3
26 Aug 2026, 16:226,885+10
23 Aug 2026, 12:546,875+8
19 Aug 2026, 21:566,867-8
16 Aug 2026, 20:576,875first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.6%
avg views ÷ 6,956 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,060
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.369%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held47 (8 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total20,576
Reactions total76
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 13:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,230
Videos
≈370
Links
≈291

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 43m
Average length
10m 40s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

544 reactions across 47 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍32760.1%
❤17532.2%
😢142.57%
😱122.21%
🔥61.10%
👌50.919%
😁40.735%
💯10.184%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 544 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (10.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 19:48 UTC886 views10 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🟢 رفتار لرزه‌ای تیرهای هم‌بند تیرهای هم‌بند در سیستم‌های سازه‌ای دارای دیوارهای برشی کوپله، نقش مهمی در انتقال نیروهای برشی و ایجاد اندرکنش سازه‌ای بین دیوارهای برشی مجاور ایفا می‌کنند. این تیرها تحت اثر تغییرمکان نسبی دو دیوار، علاوه بر لنگرهای خمشی قابل توجه، متحمل نیروهای برشی زیادی می‌شوند و در نتیجه، تغییرشکل‌های برشی قابل ملاحظه‌ای در آن‌ها ایجاد می‌گردد. به دلیل نسبت دهانه به ارتفاع کم در بسیاری از تیرهای هم‌…

❤7👍3

Signed F Ghahramani

3 Nov 2026, 10:18 UTC≈1,030 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

🎬 View from the Top: Ashraf Habibullah, Computers and Structures Inc. 📺 720p ​​💜 Ashraf Habibullah, founder, president, and CEO of Computers and Structures Inc., a global leader in the development of software tools for structural and earthquake engineering, speaks about "Empowering the Next Generation of Engineers." This Berkeley Engineering View from the Top lecture was delivered Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2019, in Banata…

👍2

Signed F Ghahramani

1 Nov 2026, 13:10 UTC≈1,370 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

🎬 TECH TIPS: ETABS Steel Connection Design 📺 720p ​​In this video, we will discuss all of the new features included in the new ETABS Steel Connection Design, including output and detailed design reports. 👉Related post: https://t.me/ETABS_Ghahramani/2930 1405.08.10 📔📒📕📗📘📙📚📖 @ETABS_Ghahramani

❤2👍2

Signed F Ghahramani

25 Oct 2026, 07:14 UTC≈2,530 views14 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

👈 مدت زمان قالب برداری 👆 مدت زمان قالب برداری توصیه شده برای باز کردن قالب ها مطابق آیین نامه آبا ویرایش1400 تغییر یافته است. این جدول در مبحث 9 چاپ 92 بود ولی در مبحث 9 چاپ 99 حذف شده و فقط در آبا هست. علاوه بر نوع عضو و متوسط دمای هوا ، طول دهانه تیرها و مقایسه بارمرده و زنده تیرها و دال ها نیز مد نطر قرار گرفته است. ✅ عدم رعایت مدت زمان مناسب می تواند منجر به خیز مثبت در دهانه های تیرها و بروز ترک های خمشی ش…

👍8❤6

Signed F Ghahramani

23 Oct 2026, 17:30 UTC≈2,330 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

🎬 Truss Design and Construction AISC Continuing Education 1405.07.25 📔📒📕📗📘📙📚📖 @ETABS_Ghahramani

🔥2❤1👍1

Signed F Ghahramani

17 Oct 2026, 10:37 UTC≈2,990 views14 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

📀 ETABS - 10 Steel Connection Design: Watch & Learn Learn about the ETABS 3D finite element based building analysis and design program and how it can be used to design 3 types of steel connections: Beam to Beam; Beam to Column; and Column Base Plates. 1405.07.25 📔📒📕📗📘📙📚📖 @ETABS_Ghahramani

❤13👌1

Signed F Ghahramani

17 Oct 2026, 10:32 UTC≈2,080 views9 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Did you know that you can design beam-to-beam connections in ETABS? 1405.07.25 📔📒📕📗📘📙📚📖 @ETABS_Ghahramani

❤8👌1

Signed F Ghahramani

15 Oct 2026, 08:44 UTC≈2,110 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Question: Why is the Story Stiffness plot showing zero in this ETABS model? Anawer: The story stiffness plot is showing all zeros (a flat vertical line at 0) primarily because ETABS cannot compute meaningful lateral story stiffness values for the selected load case. Story stiffness in ETABS is calculated as roughly Story Shear / Story Drift (for the selected direction) under a lateral load case. When that produces z…

❤3👍2

Signed F Ghahramani

10 Oct 2026, 21:18 UTC≈2,500 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

صحنه هایی دیگر از زلزله ۷.۷ ریشتری پاناما و وضعیت آسفالت یک جاده 1405.07.19 📔📒📕📗📘📙📚📖 @ETABS_Ghahramani

👍4😱3

Signed F Ghahramani

10 Oct 2026, 15:44 UTC≈2,750 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🔺️وقوع دو زمین‌لرزه قدرتمند به بزرگی ۷.۷ و ۶.۶ ریشتر در مناطق جنوبی پاناما، منجر به تخریب و فروپاشی برخی ساختمان‌ها و شکاف برداشتن جاده‌ها شد. 🔹️طبق تازه‌ترین گزارش‌ها، این حادثه خوشبختانه تلفات جانی به همراه نداشته و تنها ۱۳ نفر دچار مصدومیت جزئی شده‌اند. ارزیابی خسارات و بررسی شرایط توسط گروه‌های امدادی در جریان است. Last videos show the aftermath of a major earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 7.7 that has…

❤4👍3

Signed F Ghahramani

27 Sept 2026, 05:26 UTC≈3,100 views14 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

ورژن جدید ETABS و SAFE در ۲۳ سپتامبر منتشر شده است. V 23.3.2 1405.07.05 📔📒📕📗📘📙📚📖 @ETABS_Ghahramani

❤10🔥4

Signed F Ghahramani

18 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC929 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

🔴 ​​زلزله ها آزمایشگاه‌های واقعی هستند برای ما مهندسان. 🔴 Pereira – Colombia 🇨🇴 👈 فروریزش موضعی طبقه سوم بر روی طبقه دوم و له‌شدگی شدید طبقه دوم؛ با الگوی Pancake-type Collapse. زلزله ۷.۴ ریشتری کلمبیا دوشنبه صبح، ۱۰ آگوست ۲۰۲۶ 📍 Pereira – Colombia 🔹 از زلزله های ۲۰۲۳ ترکیه تا زلزله‌های اخیر ونزوئلا، کلمبیا و اندونزی، شاید هیچ‌گاه در تاریخ بشر چنین حجم عظیمی از تصاویر لحظه‌ای از عملکرد واقعی سازه‌ها در هنگام زلزله…

👍9👌1💯1

Signed F Ghahramani

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @ETABS_Ghahramani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ETABS_Ghahramani edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CivilCa | آموزش نرم‌افزارهای عمران و معماری
@civilarch_software · 19,153
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 October 2026
کانال جداسازی لرزه ای، سیستم های میرایی (میراگر) انرژی و کنترل ارتعاشات
@seismicisolation · 21,471
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 September 2026
گروه مهندسی 2800
@Eng2800 · 62,225
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
⚖حقوق مهندسی ایران
@hoghugh_mohandesi · 33,922
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 September 2026
مهندسی عمران | سبزسازه
@sabzsaze · 41,410
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ETABS-Ghahramani” (@ETABS_Ghahramani), 6,956 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ETABS_Ghahramani.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.