Channel
@Amirhossein_Shodja
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,777subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001316402148 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Amirhossein_Shodja |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 8 May 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Amirhossein_Shodja |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 1,777 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:36 | 1,778 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 1,777 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 1,779 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 1,786 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 1,787 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 1,789 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 1,792 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 1,790 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 1,789 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 1,789 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 May 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
دیوار پایه ها حالت خاصی از قطعات قائم دیوار لاغر هستند (یعنی نسبت ارتفاع به طول در آن ها بزگتر یا مساوی 2 است) که در دو دسته قرار می گیرند. دسته اول، دیوار پایه هایی هستند که نسبت طول به ضخامت در آن ها کمتر یا مساوی 2.5 است و ضوابط حاکم بر طرح آن ها مشابه ستونهای قابهای دارای شکل پذیری زیاد است. دسته دوم، دیوار پایه هایی هستند که نسبت طول به ضخامت در آن ها بین 2.5 تا 6.0 است. دسته دوم دیوار پایه ها هرچند ضوابط ابعاد…
📢🎥 لینک مشاهده فیلم وبینارهای برگزار شده به شرح زیر می باشد: نکات حائز اهمیت در طراحی دیافراگم ها - قسمت اول 📌لینک مشاهده فیلم👇 https://aparat.com/v/xEW1b نکات حائز اهمیت در طراحی دیافراگم ها - قسمت دوم 📌لینک مشاهده فیلم👇 https://aparat.com/v/mQDW1 نکات حائز اهمیت در طراحی دیافراگم ها - قسمت سوم 📌لینک مشاهده فیلم👇 https://aparat.com/v/CefBD #سیمای_مهندس #صدای_مهندس 📌ارتباط با سازمان👇🏻 📲کانال رسمی #روابط_ع…
Key Changes in the 2019 Edition of the ACI Building Code (ACI 318-19) 1400.03.07 📔📒📕📗📘📙📚📖 @RCdesign2 @ETABS_Ghahramani
این ویدیو بخش چالشی تر ویدیوی تعیین ضریب نامعینی است که به صورت مجزا بارگذاری شده است. اگر همکاران در هر بخشی نظرات متفاوتی دارند لطفا به اشتراک بگذارند.
بخش اول این ویدیو به مفاهیم ضریب نامعینی و ضوابط آیین نامه به همراه فلوچارت تفسیر ASCE7 پرداخته است. در بخش دوم ویدیو برخی مباحث دارای ابهام و چالشی مطرح شده است.
تصویر ۲- نظر Seaoc Seismology Committee
تصویر ۱ - پرسش و پاسخ از آقای Ghosh
پاسخ: سطح اضافه فشار لرزه ای خاک را می توان در دو سطح در نظر گرفت: سطح مقاومت و سطح تنش مجاز (ASD) اگر سطح اضافه فشار لرزه ای خاک در سطح مقاومت در نظر گرفته شود، اثر آن در ترکیب بارهای روش LRFD با ضریب 1.0 و در روش تنش مجاز با ضریب 0.7 در نظر گرفته می شود. اگر سطح اضافه فشار لرزه ای خاک در سطح تنش مجاز در نظر گرفته شود، اثر آن در ترکیب بارهای روش LRFD با ضریب 1.4 و در روش تنش مجاز با ضریب 1.0 در نظر گرفته می شود. به …
پرسش: در خصوص ضریب اضافه فشار لرزه ای خاک در ترکیبات بار سطح LRFD، برخی مراجع استفاده از ضریب 1.4 (به جای ضریب 1 که در مبحث هفتم عنوان شده است) را توصیه نموده اند. علت این تفاوت چیست و کدام یک صحیح تر است؟
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Amirhossein_Shodja. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“امیرحسین شجاع” (@Amirhossein_Shodja), 1,777 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Amirhossein_Shodja.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.