Channel
@EPIC_Institute_of_Technology
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
940subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001736317734 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EPIC_Institute_of_Technology |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EPIC_Institute_of_Technology |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 940 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:49 | 943 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 943 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
257 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 187 | 72.8% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 12.1% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 7.39% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 1.95% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 1.95% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 1.56% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.778% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.389% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.389% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.389% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.389% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 257reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2024 to 15 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅ We are pleased to announce that the admission campaign for the 2025–2026 academic year at EPIC Institute of Technology has been completed. 📋 The full list of students invited to enroll can be found in the News section on our website. There, students who have successfully passed the selection process will also find further instructions. 👏Congratulations to all the students who have earned their place at EPIC Insti…
❤12🔥7💩1🤡1🤮1
We are happy to announce the results of the third entrance exam! ✅ Passing threshold: - TSA + RTB + CL tracks: 510 points - RTF track: 300 points 📋 The full list of applicants who successfully passed is available in the News section of our website. 📩 Next steps: - By the end of this week we will review CVs of applicants who slightly fall short during exams, and post the final list of students. - Next week we will …
🔥7❤2
The final entrance exam is tomorrow! Hi everyone! This is your last chance to join EPIC Institute of Technology for the 2025–2026 academic year. 📍 The exam will be hosted on our platform ✅ There are two versions of the exam: - TSA + RTB + CL for Time Series Analysis, Real-Time Backend, and Complex Logic - RTF for Real-Time Frontend 📝 If you haven’t registered yet, follow this step-by-step guide ❓ Still have questio…
❤5⚡2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
We are happy to announce the results of the second entrance exam! 🎉 ✅ Passing threshold: - TSA + RTB + CL tracks: 600 points - RTF track: 850 points 📋 The full list of applicants who successfully passed is available in the News section of our website. 📩 Next steps: - If you passed, there’s nothing you need to do right now. Just keep an eye on your email and stay tuned for announcements here. We’ll post all importa…
❤13
The second entrance exam is tomorrow! Hi everyone! Just a quick reminder that the second entrance exam will take place tomorrow, July 26 at 15:00 CET. 📍 The exam will be hosted on our platform ✅ There are two versions of the exam: - TSA + RTB + CL for Time Series Analysis, Real-Time Backend, and Complex Logic - RTF for Real-Time Frontend 📝 If you haven’t registered yet, follow this step-by-step guide ❓ Still have q…
❤13
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥10👍1
We are happy to announce the results of the first entrance exam! 🎉 ✅ Passing threshold: - TSA + RTB + CL tracks: 800 points - RTF track: 450 points 📩 Next steps: - If you passed, there’s nothing you need to do right now. Just keep an eye on your email and stay tuned for announcements here — we’ll post all important updates. - You’ll receive an email invitation to the Discord server shortly after the third exam resu…
❤12👍4
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥2💅1
The first entrance exam is today! Hi, everyone! The first entrance exam is just 3 hours away. Make sure to double-check your setup and be on time. A few important details: • The exam will be hosted on our platform. • There are two versions of the exam: → TSA + RTB + CL for Time Series Analysis, Real-Time Backend, and Complex Logic → RTF for Real-Time Frontend 📝 Haven’t registered yet? Follow this step-by-step guid…
❤12💅3
🎓 Admissions for the 2025–2026 academic year are now open! 🎓 If you're ready to take your skills to the next level — now’s your time to apply. Here’s a step-by-step guide: 1️⃣ Register on our platform → You can immediately try a test contest to check your readiness and get familiar with the platform. 2️⃣ Take one entrance exam on July 20, July 26, or August 1 → You can register for exam in the 'Contests' tab. → The…
❤17🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EPIC_Institute_of_Technology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,445,096 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EPIC Institute of Technology” (@EPIC_Institute_of_Technology), 940 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EPIC_Institute_of_Technology.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.