23 Nov 2024, 19:25 UTC836 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
TestFlight iOS PWA app is back again. If someone missed it.
🔥6
Channel
Enecuum News🦄
@ENQbeam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
406subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001185176370 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ENQbeam |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ENQbeam |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 406 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 408 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 410 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 410 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
198 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 69 | 34.8% | |
| 🔥 | 56 | 28.3% | |
| ❤ | 40 | 20.2% | |
| 🏆 | 11 | 5.56% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 2.02% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.02% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.52% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 1.01% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.01% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.01% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.01% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.505% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.505% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.505% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 198reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2023 to 23 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
10 Jul 2024, 05:05 UTC≈1,260 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
The Pulse PoW docker images are finally public. With the standard command to run a database container: docker run -d --name pulse_db -e MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD=<your_db_password> enecuum/pulse_db The following command allows to run PoW node: docker run -ti --name pulse_pow --link pulse_db:dbhost -p8000:8000 -e PUB_KEY=<your_pub_key> -e PORT=8000 -e DB_PASS='root' -e PEER='65.109.66.179:8000' -e DB_PORT=3306 -e MINER_INS…
🔥7❤1👌1
20 May 2024, 19:35 UTC894 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Explorer/API server is back operating. But we are still looking into the issues with misleading PoA nodes online data and unstable PoS node sync for some users. That is why PoW node is not released.
👍4❤1
20 May 2024, 16:32 UTC901 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Explorer/API server outage. We didn't find a way to get the system back online. It looks like a hardware issue, so we are awaiting a response from our hosting provider technical support. Our separate node has the following last block. Block number: 7618816 Block time: May 20, 2024 10:53:50 UTC It is roughly the time when the Explorer/API server went offline. Currently, the Pulse network is stopped as PoA nodes ha…
👍3😱2
28 Mar 2024, 12:06 UTC964 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
New PoS images fixing time between blocks are published. PoS owners, please, update your nodes. Check the new command to run PoS here. With this update being successful we will publish PoW images soon.
🔥7👌3❤1
2 Mar 2024, 18:46 UTC≈1,140 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Tomorrow, March 3rd, at block 7267328, the decentralization update of the Pulse network is planned. It is scheduled for approximately 14:00 UTC. For PoS owners, to avoid downtime, please update your PoS nodes before the fork block using the latest pulse_db and pulse_pos images. Use the old commands (as described in guides.enecuum.com) to run PoS. For PoA miners, only PWA v0.7.0 apps currently support bootnode, and …
🔥12❤3🏆2👍1
20 Feb 2024, 12:17 UTC≈1,080 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
PWA v0.7.0 is already available. This version fully supports upcoming decentralization update for Pulse network. Android version is available here: https://app.enecuum.com/PWA-v0.7.0.apk. Browser version is available in Chrome Web Store and iOS version is in TestFlight as always. iOS release is labeled as 1.0 (50).
❤6🔥5🏆2👍2
3 Dec 2023, 18:32 UTC≈1,060 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File
🎙Thanks to everyone who attended the news digest. We attach an entry for those who for some reason could not attend. ❓You have the opportunity to ask the team a question in advance, question will be voiced in the next episode of the news digest. Website | Blockchain explorer | WebWallet | Download Masternode | Medium
👍4👎1🔥1
17 Nov 2023, 18:56 UTC999 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File
🎙Thanks to everyone who attended the news digest. We attach an entry for those who for some reason could not attend. ❓You have the opportunity to ask the team a question in advance, question will be voiced in the next episode of the news digest. Website | Blockchain explorer | WebWallet | Download Masternode | Medium
❤11👍3🏆1
10 Nov 2023, 11:48 UTC921 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo
🖤Dear community! The team's main goal right now is the decentralization Track Update. During the BIT nodes tests, we identified missing node sync validation rules. We are currently incorporating these rules into the nodes. Once this process is completed, Docker images of the PoS nodes will be released on the BIT network We'll share more details with you next week. Website | Blockchain explorer | WebWallet | Downlo…
👍10🏆2🔥2❤1
3 Nov 2023, 17:00 UTC823 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File
🎙Thanks to everyone who attended the news digest. We attach an entry for those who for some reason could not attend. We also have a text version. ❓You have the opportunity to ask the team a question in advance, question will be voiced in the next episode of the news digest. Website | Blockchain explorer | WebWallet | Download Masternode | Medium
👍6👏2🔥2😁1
3 Nov 2023, 04:09 UTC≈1,140 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo
🖤Dear community! 💰 KuCoin has announced that ENQ will be delisted. After month of uncertainty regarding closed deposits, we've finally received official letter. The reasons cited include holders' complaints and low volumes. ❗️We urge all holders to withdraw ENQ from KuCoin. If you've got $ENQ on KuCoin, it's time to move them out. We're unsure about the exchange's reserves for ENQ after the 2020 incident and can't …
👍7😢3🤔2❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ENQbeam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 432,506 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Enecuum News🦄” (@ENQbeam), 406 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ENQbeam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.