2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 337–339 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 07:03
338
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:13
338
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 9 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
35.5%
avg views ÷ 338 subscribers
Avg views / post
120
1 post measured
Reaction rate
25.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held
19 (9 October 2025 – 22 July 2026)
Views total
120
Reactions total
30
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
33
Videos
45
Links
56
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5m 19s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
589 reactions across 19 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
108
18.3%
custom 5251735402225625314
92
15.6%
custom 5237691237124820624
45
7.64%
❤🔥
31
5.26%
custom 5309914522411096454
30
5.09%
🍾
22
3.74%
custom 5296282115824968715
18
3.06%
💋
18
3.06%
custom 5253666011500010662
17
2.89%
🥰
17
2.89%
👌
15
2.55%
💘
15
2.55%
🤣
15
2.55%
custom 5352652509317967258
14
2.38%
🔥
14
2.38%
custom 5382003319386420581
13
2.21%
custom 5379722412579371114
12
2.04%
custom 5382153690486421713
12
2.04%
custom 5382056881923569495
10
1.70%
custom 5354820780607680286
9
1.53%
20 further kinds
62
10.5%
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 589reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2025 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 19 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @EKutopia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 October 2025 to 22 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Не знаю, делали ли такое видео другие фанаты, но я брала идею из другого фандома🙏
⭐️ Голосовать за канал
———————————————
❤️ Видео основано на материалах передачи «Дела судебные». Оригиналы — в группе ВК: https://vk.com/sudmirtv
Я вас немного тоже помучаю этой музыкой. Вы ж не против?))
⭐️ Голосовать за канал
———————————————
❤️ Видео основано на материалах передачи «Дела судебные». Оригиналы — в группе ВК: https://vk.com/sudmirtv
Позднее видео 🤫
Всем добрых снов 💤🐱
⭐️ Голосовать за канал
———————————————
❤️ Видео основано на материалах передачи «Дела судебные». Оригиналы — в группе ВК: https://vk.com/sudmirtv
Спустя месяц я здесь 👀
⭐️ Голосовать за канал
———————————————
❤️ Видео основано на материалах передачи «Дела судебные». Оригиналы — в группе ВК: https://vk.com/sudmirtv
Такие видео редко набирают много просмотров, но самое главное, что мне нравится, и я делаю это в первую очередь для себя) 🌸
P.s. могу пропасть, так как идеи для видео кончаются(( канал забрасывать не планирую!
🌸 Голосовать за канал
———————————————
❤️ Видео основано на материалах передачи «Дела судебные». Оригиналы — в группе ВК: https://vk.com/sudmirtv
📌 Сразу скажу, что ничего против других шоу не имею! Но «Дела судебные» - это уже отдельная любовь ❤️😍
P.s. как у вас дела с телеграмом?🐱
⭐️Голосовать за канал
———————————————
❤️ Видео основано на материалах передачи «Дела судебные». Оригиналы — в группе ВК: https://vk.com/sudmirtv
Наконец-то вышел новый сезон «Новых историй» с Еленой Кутьиной 🥳😎
Берём все вкусняшки из холодильника и быстренько включаем 🍔
📱👇Смотреть👇📱
https://vk.ru/wall-220759220_27368
Как всегда врываюсь в тренды с опозданием…🐱
(Идею взяла в другом фандоме)
*Не забываем ставить реакции и голосовать за канал 🥰👇
⭐️Голосовать за канал
———————————————
❤️ Видео основано на материалах передачи «Дела судебные». Оригиналы — в группе ВК: https://vk.com/sudmirtv
Ну что, всех с Днём влюбленных!❤️💋
Сегодня, в этот романтичный день, делюсь нарезкой, которую обещала. Надеюсь, она поднимет вам настроение! Приятного просмотра!😶
⭐️Голосовать за канал
———————————————
❤️ Видео основано на материалах передачи «Дела судебные». Оригиналы — в группе ВК: https://vk.com/sudmirtv
#ЕленаКутьина #ДелаСудебные #Судья #Суд
Итак, большее количество человек проголосовало за эдит. Но это не значит, что я не выложу нарезку - она обязательно будет и уже давно готова, просто ждёт своей очереди) а пока - ловите такой миленький эдит 🌸
P.s. у меня закончился телеграм-премиум, поэтому посты будут достаточно простенько выглядеть 😟
⭐ Голосовать за канал
#ЕленаКутьина #ДелаСудебные #Судья #Суд
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @EKutopia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2025 to 22 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мир Елены Кутьиной | «Дела судебные»” (@EKutopia), 338 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EKutopia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.