Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for EKG

Channel

EKG

@EKG_DrAli

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

534subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002808225531
TypeChannel
Username@EKG_DrAli
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/EKG_DrAli

Growth

52053452731 August 2026 — 520 subscribers1 September 2026 — 520 subscribers10 September 2026 — 526 subscribers18 September 2026 — 534 subscribers31 August 202618 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 18 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 518–536 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:41534+8
10 Sept 2026, 03:17526+6
1 Sept 2026, 05:54520no change
31 Aug 2026, 10:00520first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1050.0%
840.0%
👏210.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 03:53 UTC337 views8 reactionsread 31 August 2026

⚠️ Misplacement of V1 & V2: غلطة صغيرة... ممكن تغيّر تفسير التخطيط تماماً 📍 المكان الصحيح - لازم V1 و V2 يكونو بالمسافة الوربية الرابعة (4th intercostal space) ❗ إذا انحطوا أعلى من مكانهم، ممكن يعطوك تخطيط "مضلّل"، مثل: ✅ 1. تغيّر بموجة P - V1: بتصير سالبة بالكامل بدل ما تكون biphasic. - V2: بتصير biphasic أو سالبة بدل ما تكون موجبة. ➡️ هاي أول إشارة تخليك تشك أن المشكلة من مكان المساري. ✅ 2. Incomplete RBB

8

Signed Ali Qassas

27 Apr 2026, 12:09 UTC625 views5 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Used mainly for diagnosing 👉 Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy 🔹 Why they exist In ARVC, you want to better visualize: Epsilon waves Delayed RV activation Standard ECG can miss these → Fontaine leads increase sensitivity. 🔹 Electrode placement (different from standard) RA → manubrium (upper sternum) LA → xiphoid process LL → V4 position 👉 Then record like a modified limb system 🔹 What do they enhance?

🔥5

Signed Ali Qassas

27 Apr 2026, 12:08 UTC510 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026

وقت نشك ب Brugada syndrome Move V1–V2 up to: 2nd or 3rd intercostal space 👉 Increases sensitivity for: Coved ST elevation Type 1 Brugada pattern

🔥1

Signed Ali Qassas

27 Apr 2026, 12:04 UTC396 viewsread 31 August 2026

Provide right-lateral view of heart Mirror image of V3-V6 Consider in setting of inferior MI Useful for diagnosing RV MI

Signed Ali Qassas

27 Apr 2026, 12:02 UTC389 viewsread 31 August 2026

والأفضل نرفع ال mm/mV لل 20 أو ال 50 لتظهر ال p wave

Signed Ali Qassas

27 Apr 2026, 12:00 UTC409 viewsread 31 August 2026

نستخدم المساري الطرفية limb leads وونقلها للصدر بهي الطريقة Right arm (RA) → 2nd intercostal space, right sternal border Left arm (LA) → 4th intercostal space, right sternal border Left leg (LL) → stays in normal position 👉 Then you record Lead I

Signed Ali Qassas

27 Apr 2026, 12:00 UTC408 views3 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

1- Lewis lead: Used to enhance atrial activity (P waves)

🔥3

Signed Ali Qassas

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EKG_DrAli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EKG” (@EKG_DrAli), 534 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EKG_DrAli.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.