3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 267–268 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 05:46
268
+1
8 Aug 2026, 09:00
267
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:39
267
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.2%
avg views ÷ 268 subscribers
Avg views / post
62.2
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
23.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
12 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
746
Reactions total
178
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12m 25s
Average length
6m 13s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
178 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
111
62.4%
💯
22
12.4%
🙏
11
6.18%
👏
10
5.62%
🔥
9
5.06%
🕊
8
4.49%
🥰
4
2.25%
🦄
2
1.12%
💘
1
0.562%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 178reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 12 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DzhuPsy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Дорогие кверентки!
Предлагаю вашему вниманию интересный и весьма информативный расклад.
Записывайтесь на точку сборки🔮
1.Какая я сейчас на моем пути?
2.Где я сейчас?
3.Кто рядом со мной?
4.На чем поставить фокус?
5.Насколько сложным, долгим будет работа?
6.Что это может мне принести (потенциал)?
7.К какой себе я иду?
8.Как я могу поддержать себя на пути к переменам/к цели?
Буду рада настроить ваш компас 🧭
Стоимо…
Добрый вечер✨
Очень много, последнее время, работаю с темой эмоций, которые всегда очень сложно прорабатываются, потому что напрямую связаны с телом.
А почему? Потому что их надо прожить, а это очень сложно, неудобно, страшно и больно.
Нужно постоянно ходить по этому лезвию, ранить себя осколками ожиданий. укачивать свою боль из раза в раз. Падать в это как в пучину и пытаться выплыть.
Возникает желание эмоции осо…
Настоящая сила — это не наш парадный фасад, который мы отшлифовываем для окружающих. Это не только те наши таланты, которые мы развиваем, чтобы получать одобрение, и не те черты, которые позволяют нам чувствовать себя уверенно.
Истинный стержень спрятан глубже — в той тёмной, непроявленной части натуры, которую мы стыдливо запираем в подвал сознания.
В том, что мы называем слабостью, недостатком или считаем ущербным…
Люди, имейте совесть!
Минимальное, что вы можете сделать послушав послания - работу которую я делаю для вас, хотя бы поставить лайк.
Что ж вы такие жадненькие или все это вам не нужно?
Если хочется, чтобы вас как-то замечали, оценивали ваш труд или вашу работу, чтобы как-то плюсики кармические вам капали и что-то хорошее в вашей жизни происходило, чтобы вы хоть кому-то были заметны и нужны, ну делитесь вы с другими,…
Ну нааааааш!
Джонни Депп создал свою коллекцию картин "Таро", на создание которой его вдохновила его бывшая жена, Ванесса Паради. В этой коллекции он поднял темы судьбы и предначертания с помощью сюрреализма и символизма.
Джонни, даешь всю колоду🔥
Философ Джошуа Хабгуд-Кут в эссе для Aeon пишет о том, как ностальгия по навыкам – желание снова делать вещи руками, стала массовым явлением.
Философ подсвечивает важную вещь: скучая по ремеслам прошлого, мы часто тоскуем не столько по самому прошлому, сколько по чувству осмысленного труда. Когда твой навык растёт, твой материал отвечает тебе, а результат можно потрогать, измерить и разделить с другими.
Когда ручная …
Август пахнет нагретой сосновой смолой, вереском, сухим мхом и тёплыми камнями на берегу северных озёр. В его вечерах уже чувствуется дыхание осени, но дни всё ещё наполнены тем самым спокойным, зрелым светом, которого не бывает ни в июне, ни в июле.
За это и любим.
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @DzhuPsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДжулеМА👁️” (@DzhuPsy), 268 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DzhuPsy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.