Channel
@Dzhamaatdagestana
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
440subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001674513091 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dzhamaatdagestana |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dzhamaatdagestana |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 440 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 442 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 444 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:09 | 446 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 448 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 447 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 447 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 12 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
190 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 109 | 57.4% | |
| 💔 | 26 | 13.7% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 6.84% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 3.68% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 3.68% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 3.16% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 3.16% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 2.63% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 1.58% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.05% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.05% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.526% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.526% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.526% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.526% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2025 to 13 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
أَفَلَا يَتُوبُونَ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ وَيَسۡتَغۡفِرُونَهُۥۚ وَٱللَّهُ غَفُورٞ رَّحِيمٞ Неужели они не раскаются перед Аллахом и не попросят у Него прощения? Ведь Аллах - Прощающий, Милосердный. -Сура Аль-Ма'ида, аят 74
❤24❤🔥2👍2👏1
Бойтесь Аллаха должным образом и умирайте не иначе, как будучи мусульманами!
❤11👍3
Видео от abuusama
❤8👎3
В секторе Газа голод безжалостно грызет тела палестинцев, превращая их в скелеты, дышащие в агонии💔 Те, кто избежал обстрелов оккупации, стали жертвами голода, который уносит жизни в тишине, более отвратительной, чем грохот бомб.
💔26💩2❤1🤡1😁1
Video, posted without a caption
❤5
Video, posted without a caption
❤4
Ты надеваешь хиджаб, выходишь покрытой, АльхамдулиЛлягь. Но потом берёшь флакон духов и наносишь аромат, который остаётся в воздухе даже после тебя. И этим, сама того не замечая, аннулируешь смысл своего хиджаба. Ибо хиджаб — это не просто ткань. Хиджаб означает, что ты закрыта, ты не для чужих глаз, не для чужих желаний. А теперь представь: этот аромат, который ты оставляешь в воздухе, тянет взгляды, вызывает вожде…
❤8🤮1
Video, posted without a caption
❤6
Амин ❤️
❤7
А что тебе отвратило от Ислама Этот вопрос пусть каждый из нас задаст сам себе
❤3👍1🔥1
Как вам такая картина: жена имама Шамиля надевает на себя военную форму России гордясь ею, эта форма обтягивает, выделяет фигуру, плечи и т.д. Подбородок, который является авратом, открыт, хиджаб на голове, как фантик от чупа-чупса и при этом выступает против правильного хиджаба с закрытием лица? Представили? Не можете? Оскорбление имама Шамиля и его чести? Просто знайте, что есть дегенераты, которые считают муфти…
❤6💯5🤡1
Даже кошка не так смотрит на сметану, как Майранов на жену муфтия выступающую в обтягивающем платье цвета камуфляжа. Майранов, куда смотришь? Взор опусти! Айяяй, как тебе не стыдно…!
🤣7❤1🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Dzhamaatdagestana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dzhamaat_dagestana” (@Dzhamaatdagestana), 440 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dzhamaatdagestana.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.