Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Dzenis TA

@Dzenis_TA

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

998subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001219624977
TypeChannel
Username@Dzenis_TA
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Dzenis_TA

Growth

9981,001999.56 August 2026 — 1,001 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,001 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,000 subscribers10 August 2026 — 998 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 998–1,001 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 07:45998-2
7 Aug 2026, 08:511,000-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:171,001no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:591,001first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

680 reactions across 20 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍24335.7%
🔥11016.2%
7010.3%
🦄446.47%
👏385.59%
😁345.00%
🥰294.26%
🏆263.82%
🤣172.50%
🤡121.76%
🐳111.62%
🙏50.735%
😭40.588%
🤔40.588%
🫡40.588%
❤‍🔥30.441%
😢30.441%
😱30.441%
🎉20.294%
👎20.294%
12 further kinds162.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 680reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2025 to 2 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Apr 2025, 23:48 UTC≈2,470 views52 reactionsread 6 August 2026

This was a hilarious round-trip. Busy away from screens for just a few hours, didn't get a chance to move up my stop loss from entry into profit, so round-tripped the entire move. My sell orders were just above the high at 88800, price reached into 88500 and reversed. Had a great read on the market, but executed like crap. Let's just say I'm mildly annoyed. You can't say it wasn't entertaining though! https://www.

👍3111😢3🗿2🤪2🥰2🦄1

Signed Dzenis

2 Apr 2025, 23:32 UTC≈2,030 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁6🔥1🦄1

Signed Dzenis

2 Apr 2025, 20:17 UTC≈1,750 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁26🥰6👏5🤔1

Signed Dzenis

2 Apr 2025, 15:58 UTC≈1,630 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Thesis playing out well. 4 hours to go until the tariffs announcement, and the price seems to be front-running it. https://www.tradingview.com/x/VOlGHR6o/

🔥9🏆53👏3🦄3👍1👎1🥰1

Signed Dzenis

1 Apr 2025, 03:57 UTC≈1,690 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Given all of the above, let's try to formulate an actionable useful thesis around all this. Since markets hate uncertainty, and they react to it by selling risky assets (crypto, equities) and buying safe assets (gold), we can notice a few things right now: 1. Uncertainty is increasing as we're nearing the 2nd of April, Trump's "Liberation day", tariffs going into effect. 2. Uncertainty, by itself, brings overreact

👍32🔥31🤯1🥰1🦄1

Signed Dzenis

29 Mar 2025, 22:37 UTC≈1,270 views48 reactionsread 6 August 2026

To answer that question, it's impossible to look at BTC independently of the macro-economic policies and traditional markets (mainly SPX/NASDAQ), because it is heavily correlated and influenced by them now. This is a much bigger topic that I will not go into great detail here due to its complexity, but I'll emphasize one element of it: The one thing markets hate the most is uncertainty. If you try to find a fair pr

👍35🔥6🐳2🤝2🦄2👌1

Signed Dzenis

29 Mar 2025, 21:40 UTC≈1,120 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Previous support in the "be careful here" zone turned resistance as warned when price was testing it last week. Now we have 92k as a level that will act as the pivot between the "bull market" and "bear market" from here onwards. For as long as the price remains below that level, this is officially a down-trending market in the short-to-medium term, no matter how you look at it, there's no more excuses to be found.

👍13🔥8😱32🐳2🦄1😭1

Signed Dzenis

20 Mar 2025, 00:45 UTC≈1,570 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026

We had a confirmed range breakdown, and the middle grey zone has turned from "be aggressive here" into "be careful here" as we're retesting it from below this time, it will act as a resistance. I'll post a more detailed update after the weekly close, but for now this chart is still the best and the simplest way to navigate this market while remaining cool-headed. https://www.tradingview.com/x/exRWu19T/

👍313🥰3🔥1🦄1

Signed Dzenis

3 Mar 2025, 18:42 UTC≈2,240 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

That magical word hits us again

🤣17🤡12🦄4

Signed Dzenis

3 Mar 2025, 18:34 UTC≈2,050 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Really need to see buyers step in here, otherwise this will be a failed range reclaim. https://www.tradingview.com/x/8TGo7dom/

👍14🦄4😭3🥰2

Signed Dzenis

2 Mar 2025, 23:23 UTC≈1,930 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

No aggressive leveraged buyers. Open Interest (total open positions) completely reset, and the market seems to be in disbelief to this move. This is setting up beautifully. 87-89k is crucial area to hold, but my guess is even a shallow dip into 92-90k area will be bought up on Monday

👍19🙏5🐳1🤔1🦄1😁1

Signed Dzenis

2 Mar 2025, 20:35 UTC≈1,560 views53 reactionsread 6 August 2026

For now, we remain bullish and looking for a new ATH on BTC

🏆21👍13👏7🥰3🦄3🎉2🍾1🐳1

Signed Dzenis

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Dzenis_TA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dzenis TA” (@Dzenis_TA), 998 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dzenis_TA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.