2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 64–66 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 02:32
65
no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:33
65
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 22 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Links
4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
341 reactions across 4 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
94
27.6%
❤
90
26.4%
👍
51
15.0%
custom 5456276227490847488
40
11.7%
custom 5276310500718683188
19
5.57%
custom 5454173969848475270
10
2.93%
💩
6
1.76%
🍌
5
1.47%
👎
5
1.47%
🤨
4
1.17%
💯
3
0.88%
🕊
3
0.88%
⚡
2
0.587%
❤🔥
2
0.587%
🌭
2
0.587%
🏆
2
0.587%
💔
2
0.587%
😁
1
0.293%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 341reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2022 to 22 August 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇺🇸 Also, I have Premium, I know what I'm talking about.
UPD: A little more. (It didn't fit in the last post, so I'm writing it here.) The last paragraph, where I say that the average user, and before that the fact that it's impossible to sit and see Telegram die, is more likely to be misunderstood. A regular user, is someone - who downloaded the app and communicates with friends. He does not care what is going on, w…
🇺🇲 Addendum and clarification.
My goal is to show people that Durov and his team don't care about users, and are willing to do anything to make money. "well, it's a free messenger, it's not monetized in any way" and such messages. I'll answer briefly. If it wasn't monetized in any way, it wouldn't have survived this long, and there wouldn't have been big money raffled off at contests (see this). Why do I even think …
🇷🇺 Павел Валерьевич Дуров - предприниматель и программист, долларовый миллиардер российского происхождения. Владелец Telegram и бывший владелец ВКонтакте (российская социальная сеть).
В чем же проблема?
Обновление с Telegram Premium. С начала того, как его нам представили, многие пользователи начали возмущаться. Его нам показали более чем 2 месяца назад, почему же все так плохо? Давайте сейчас выясним.
Начнем с нач…
🇺🇸 Pavel Valeryevich Durov is an entrepreneur and programmer, a dollar billionaire of Russian origin. He is the owner of Telegram and the former owner of VKontakte (the Russian social network).
What's the problem?
Update with Telegram Premium. From the beginning when it was introduced to us, many users began to resent it. It was shown to us more than 2 months ago, so why is it so bad? Let's find out now.
Let's star…
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @DurovStop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@DurovStop named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@natribu named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@DurovStop” (@DurovStop), 65 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DurovStop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
