4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 228–229 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 20:43
228
-1
11 Aug 2026, 03:46
229
no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:16
229
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:05
229
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 32s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,297 reactions across 18 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
809
15.3%
🔥
773
14.6%
👍
760
14.3%
🎉
740
14.0%
🥰
717
13.5%
🤩
708
13.4%
👏
696
13.1%
🎄
20
0.378%
☃
15
0.283%
🐳
15
0.283%
👻
7
0.132%
🎅
6
0.113%
👨💻
5
0.094%
🍌
4
0.076%
🤬
4
0.076%
🏆
3
0.057%
🤝
3
0.057%
🥴
3
0.057%
👎
2
0.038%
💘
2
0.038%
4 further kinds
5
0.094%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,297reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 November 2024 to 12 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9,908
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 18 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
6,000
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DuckPirate. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 November 2024 to 12 June 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🧑🚀 Встречайте нашего Telegram-бота с уникальными функциями! ♦️ Регистрируйся на турнир с призовым фондом 25$ в виде подарка t.me/nft/SnowMittens-19742 победитель получит этот подарок. Вход 20 билетов, билеты можно получить выполняя задание в боте.
✈️ @GiftNFTbot Получайте эксклюзивные награды!
🖥Игровые режимы:
Спортивные игры: Выбирайте футбол ⚽️, баскетбол ⛹️♂️, боулинг 🎳, дартс 🎯 или кости 🎲! Делайте ставку, отп…
🤯 Бот для просмотра фильмов который никогда не заблокируют.
❗️ @smotret_film_bot ™️
🏴☠️ Смотри любимые фильмы не выходя с телеграм.
🤖 Также ты можешь создать себе такого же бота абсолютно БЕСПЛАТНО и всего в пару кликов.
📺 Создавая такого бота можно распостранять его и зарабатывать на рекламе которую можно показать в боте.
👍 @smotret_film_bot ⚡️
📞 A bot for watching movies that will never be blocked. 🔓
🏴☠…
☝️ @Pirateconstructorbot
🛍Признавайся были такие мысли чтобы иметь свой IT бизнес ? 💻
📰Так вот мы предлагаем тебе создать свой IT бизнес в Телеграм без знания программирования и без каких либо вложений чтобы начать пассивно зарабатывать. 🤑
🔐Представляю вашему вниманию конструктор казино бота:
😉@Pirateconstructorbot
😓Создай своё казино в два клика и начните зарабатывать прямо сейчас. 🤑
🏴☠️Помощь по созданию и н…
🏖 @PirateCasinobot👌
🍭Испытай удачу в первом пиратском казино в океане телеграм. ✅
✅Обмана тут быть не может, в качестве слот-машины используются встроенные в Telegram анимированные emoji (Результат формируется на стороне серверов Telegram)✅
🧑💻Либо игры защищены криптогарфическим контролем честности👍
🏖 @PirateCasinobot 👌
Try your luck at the first pirate casino in the ocean of telegrams✈️
✅There can be no cheati…
❤50🤩41🔥38🎉36👍36🥰35👏32☃1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DuckPirate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 642,799 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@DuckPirate named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@smotret_film_bot named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Duck Pirate☠️” (@DuckPirate), 228 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DuckPirate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
