Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

👨‍⚕️دکتر سجاد مجیدی‌پرست | رابطه و سلامت روان

@Drmajidi_org

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

765subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001134068954
TypeChannel
Username@Drmajidi_org
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Drmajidi_org

Growth

756765760.56 August 2026 — 756 subscribers6 August 2026 — 756 subscribers7 August 2026 — 757 subscribers13 August 2026 — 765 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 755–766 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:58765+8
7 Aug 2026, 01:28757+1
6 Aug 2026, 15:52756no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:28756first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.6%
avg views ÷ 765 subscribers
Avg views / post
196
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,915
Reactions total59
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3355.9%
👏1322.0%
👍1118.6%
🙏23.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC115 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📖 وبینار رایگان | دوره پنج‌جلسه‌ای «مثلث کارپمن» چرا گاهی در رابطه‌ها مدام نقش قربانی، نجات‌دهنده یا مهاجم را بازی می‌کنیم؟ چرا بعضی تعارض‌ها بارها تکرار می‌شوند، اما هیچ‌وقت به نتیجه نمی‌رسند؟ در این دوره پنج‌جلسه‌ای، با بازی‌های روانی پنهان در روابط آشنا می‌شویم و یاد می‌گیریم چگونه الگوهای فرساینده را بشناسیم و از آن‌ها خارج شویم. جلسه نخست: آشنایی با مثلث کارپمن 👤 مدرس: دکتر سجاد مجیدی پرست 📅 شنبه ۱۷ مرد

👍3

6 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC75 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

مثلث کارپمن الگویی از بازی‌های روانی در روابط شما کدام نقش را بیشتر در زندگی روزمره برعهده می‌گیرید؟ قربانی ناجی آزارگر پنج جلسه در خدمت شما هستیم... ♦️ @DrMajidi_org ♦️

3👍1

4 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC77 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

همراهان عزیز در صورتی که در جلسه حضور نداشتید فایل کامل جلسه در گروه آکادمی بارگذاری شد: https://t.me/drmajidiparast

2

4 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC250 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

لینک نشست (ادامه کارگاه دوازدهم مرداد ماه _ همراه با مرور جلسه پیشین) «رابطه یا زخم؟» چرا آدم‌های سرد و مبهم برایمان جذاب می‌شوند؟ سه‌شنبه ۱۳ مرداد ساعت ۲۱:۳۰ https://meet.google.com/bhd-fshn-doq لینک آرشیو جلسات در تلگرام https://t.me/drmajidiparast

1

4 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC135 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📖 ادامهٔ وبینار «رابطه یا زخم؟» چرا آدم‌های سرد و مبهم برایمان جذاب می‌شوند؟ به‌دلیل گستردگی و اهمیت موضوع، گفت‌وگوی دیشب به پایان نرسید؛ بنابراین امشب در ادامهٔ این وبینار، بحث را کامل‌تر دنبال می‌کنیم. 🖤 گاهی ابهام و بی‌توجهی را با عشق اشتباه می‌گیریم. در این جلسه بررسی می‌کنیم چرا آدم‌های سرد و مبهم برایمان جذاب‌اند و چگونه می‌توانیم از الگوهای عاطفی فرساینده فاصله بگیریم. 👤 تسهیلگر: دکتر سجاد مجیدی‌پرست 📅 س

1

3 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC94 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

همراهان عزیز در صورتی که در جلسه حضور نداشتید فایل کامل جلسه در گروه آکادمی بارگذاری شد: https://t.me/drmajidiparast

1🙏1

3 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC313 viewsread 6 August 2026

لینک نشست «رابطه یا زخم؟» چرا آدم‌های سرد و مبهم برایمان جذاب می‌شوند؟ دوشنبه ساعت 22 https://meet.google.com/bvm-fsca-dzj لینک آرشیو جلسات در تلگرام https://t.me/drmajidiparast

3 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC90 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

رابطه امن علاقه سالم با ثبات، وضوح، احترام و امکان گفت‌وگو همراه است. آرامش به معنای بی‌هیجان‌بودن رابطه نیست؛ می‌تواند نشانه امنیت عاطفی باشد. ♦️ @DrMajidi_org ♦️

2

3 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC76 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ابهام و اشتغال ذهنی مغز برای کامل‌کردن اطلاعات ناقص، مدام سناریو می‌سازد. زیاد فکرکردن به یک نفر، لزوماً نشانه صمیمیت عمیق نیست؛ گاهی نتیجه ابهام و بلاتکلیفی است. ♦️ @DrMajidi_org ♦️

1

3 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC80 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

دلبستگی اضطرابی فاصله عاطفی می‌تواند ترس از رهاشدن را فعال کند. در این وضعیت، به‌جای اینکه کیفیت رابطه را بسنجیم، تمام انرژی خود را صرف نگه‌داشتن طرف مقابل می‌کنیم. ♦️ @DrMajidi_org ♦️

1👍1

3 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC95 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

تقویت متناوب وقتی توجه یک نفر گاهی هست و گاهی نیست، مغز برای دریافت دوباره آن توجه، بیشتر درگیر می‌شود. این کشش شدید، همیشه نشانه عشق نیست؛ گاهی نتیجه غیرقابل‌پیش‌بینی‌بودن رابطه است. ♦️ @DrMajidi_org ♦️

1

1 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC528 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📖 وبینار رایگان «رابطه یا زخم؟» چرا آدم‌های سرد و مبهم برایمان جذاب می‌شوند؟ 🖤 گاهی ابهام و بی‌توجهی را با عشق اشتباه می‌گیریم. در این وبینار بررسی می‌کنیم چرا آدم‌های سرد برایمان جذاب‌اند و چگونه از الگوهای عاطفی فرساینده فاصله بگیریم. 👤 تسهیلگر: دکتر سجاد مجیدی پرست 📅 دوشنبه ۱۲ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ ⏰ ساعت ۲۲ 💻 برگزاری در بستر Google Meet لینک جلسه در گروه تلگرام به اشتراک گذاشته خواهد شد: https://t.me/drmajidip

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Drmajidi_org. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 153,654 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“👨‍⚕️دکتر سجاد مجیدی‌پرست | رابطه و سلامت روان” (@Drmajidi_org), 765 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Drmajidi_org.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.