Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дриго Евгений | Дневник Кинезиолога

Channel

Дриго Евгений | Дневник Кинезиолога

@DrigoEvgeniy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

882subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002063675839
TypeChannel
Username@DrigoEvgeniy
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DrigoEvgeniy

Growth

882885883.57 August 2026 — 882 subscribers8 August 2026 — 882 subscribers14 August 2026 — 885 subscribers23 August 2026 — 882 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 882–885 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 04:48882-3
14 Aug 2026, 19:37885+3
8 Aug 2026, 01:06882no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:11882first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.5%
avg views ÷ 882 subscribers
Avg views / post
172
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total516
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 52s
Average length
5m 52s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

414 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥20148.6%
❤‍🔥10525.4%
👍378.94%
🕊307.25%
🏆143.38%
💔112.66%
🤩102.42%
🥰61.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 414reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DrigoEvgeniy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC118 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Изменение территории далеко не всегда означает создание пространства для отдыха. Иногда коллективное бессознательное помогает в это погрузиться ("Если ты на море- значит можешь отдохнуть"). Но порой и даже это не помогает людям. Самое важное - выбор в моменте. Можно оказаться в райском саду, но быть напряженным, думать о делать и суетить. А можно остаться в привычной территории и "Отключить" контроль, сместить фоку

❤‍🔥15👍5

5 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC191 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Экспедиция на Кайлас.

  1. Желание и мечта.54%
  2. Первый раз слышу, но что-то зацепило.35%
  3. Набор слов.10%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC207 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сказать «потом»- все равно что налить воду в песок и надеяться утолить жажду завтра.

💔8🔥5

24 Jul 2026, 05:04 UTC456 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Провожу интересное исследование и получаю уже первые результаты. Кусочек про физиогномику. Мимика, морщины, формы частей лица. Все это влияет на нашу психику и контакт с окружающим миром. Глобально вся наша жизнь может строиться вокруг "недовольного лица". Выбор машины, еды, круга общения, и тд. Сложно представить человека с поднятыми бровями и удивленным взглядом - врачом хирургом. Или с сжатыми-хмурыми бровями- ан

🔥35🏆6

18 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC417 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Себе, для себя: «Ты не соревнуешься с ними Каждый выполняет свою задачу и у каждого своя цель Лишь человек 5 из категории работают на тумбу и это тоже следствие результата Ты уже тут и это большой шаг Весь твой путь ценен Тебе всего достаточно, чтобы пройти эту дистанцию и в удовольствие, и крепко поработать. Да, могут быть внешние факторные, которые могут мешать, но у тебя всегда есть возможность адаптироваться

🔥28🏆6🕊6

16 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC350 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Про работу с иностранцем. Стерли языковой барьер через работу с бессознательной частью. Не сказал в видео, что в моментах я даже сам забывал слова родные ;)

🔥12❤‍🔥6

16 Jul 2026, 05:28 UTC349 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какой формат эфиров для вас удобней ?

  1. 2-3 эфира в неделю по 45-60 минут16%
  2. 1 эфир в неделю на 2-3 часа8%
  3. Много коротких записей по 15-20 минут82%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Jul 2026, 06:37 UTC438 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нередкий диалог в кабинете про "НАДО" и "ХОЧУ". НАДО: действие, в которое мы вкладываем ресурс, чтобы возможно когда-то в перспективе получить обратку ( но это неточно). Примеры: Надо правильно питаться Надо заниматься спортом Надо помогать людям Надо хорошо учиться Хочу: Действие, в которое мы вкладываем ресурс, но получаем сразу же обкатку и порой х2. Важно слышать, как мы выражаем идею и разница очень большая в

🔥20❤‍🔥7

5 Jul 2026, 05:11 UTC413 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Твой выбор из ума или чувств? Как ты дышишь и чувствуешь себя когда взаимодействуешь с тем или иным человеком? Где ты улыбаешься сквозь зубы и замираешь? Но в голове убеждаешь- все нормально ? Дыхание - чувствовать себя. Не чувствуя дыхание, а зная, что оно есть- то и живем из состояния автоматизма и убеждений: "Так правильно!" "Так хорошо" "А когда раньше так делал, то был результат" Важно: Как здесь и сейчас я д

👍8🕊7🥰2

4 Jul 2026, 04:51 UTC393 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥17

3 Jul 2026, 04:48 UTC412 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Поступили вопросы про аскезу. В моем взгляде это определенное соглашение и договор с окружающим миром. Выбор, который я делаю либо высвобождает энергию, либо приносит. Например- исключение соц сетей за час до сна - дает уму отдых, лучшее восстановление, лучшее пробуждение и более качественное начала дня, а возможно и весь день. И следующий день еще на процент лучше и так в гору. Выбор определенных продуктов- сюда ж

🔥21❤‍🔥6

2 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC361 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Есть такой интересный процент клиентов, у которых результаты и изменения в жизни происходят по "щелчку" коррекции. И порой такие изменение, что сам диву даюсь! И вот забавный случай: Пару недель назад на приеме была девушка с запросом на дичайший страх перед экзаменами и предстоящим дипломом. Учится отлично, знания есть, но, как только экзамен, то тут прям "паралич при страхе". Вроде бы обычное дело, но давайте р

🔥14🤩9👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DrigoEvgeniy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTCAnonymous Poll48 voters

Экспедиция на Кайлас.

  1. Желание и мечта.54%
  2. Первый раз слышу, но что-то зацепило.35%
  3. Набор слов.10%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Jul 2026, 05:28 UTCAnonymous Poll38 voters

Какой формат эфиров для вас удобней ?

  1. 2-3 эфира в неделю по 45-60 минут16%
  2. 1 эфир в неделю на 2-3 часа8%
  3. Много коротких записей по 15-20 минут82%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дриго Евгений | Дневник Кинезиолога” (@DrigoEvgeniy), 882 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrigoEvgeniy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.