https://t.me/Rocky_Bitcoin

Channel
Crypto Gems
@DreamGEMS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
139subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001756378941 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DreamGEMS |
| Description | This channel provides, random giveaways, whitelists for the newest gems, cash giveaway and much more! Please note that this is not a financial advice! Contact: @Dream_GEMS |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DreamGEMS |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 139 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 139 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 28
- Videos
- 6
- Links
- 206
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
https://t.me/yinghedexsol
https://t.me/blum/app?startapp=ref_gOtftB1qEe Join me on Blum and let's earn together! Use my invite link to join the fun. 🌟
https://t.me/BTCT_official_bot/BTCT?startapp=2140103573 💰 Come on, mine $BTCT on the TON blockchain every day, and there is income every day! 💰 The earlier you join, the more mining income you will get!
https://t.me/BTCT_official_bot/BTCT?startapp=2140103573 💰 Come on, mine $BTCT on the TON blockchain every day, and there is income every day! 💰 The earlier you join, the more mining income you will get!
https://t.me/Free_PavelDurov_Bot/FreePavelDurov?startapp=F2140103573 Draw more attention to the importance of free speech through the $FREE airdrop. Fight for Freedom!
https://t.me/catizenbot/gameapp?startapp=r_752_27198634 💰Catizen: Unleash, Play, Earn - Where Every Game Leads to an Airdrop Adventure! 🎁Let's play-to-earn airdrop right now!
https://t.me/Hamster_Land_Bot/Hamster?startapp=acef381db9 Hammy hammy hammy? Yes tap hammy!
t.me/catsgang_bot/join?startapp=HL3xG6k7YJdaX0OArtzRl Meow, lets see who is OG 😼
https://t.me/catsgang_bot/join?startapp=LvlZBvMfdRWv0sja-ijvb
https://t.me/dogshouse_bot/join?startapp=aL-igxACRS6zONLK_vFw1Q Who let the DOGS out?
https://t.me/dogshouse_bot/join?startapp=aL-igxACRS6zONLK_vFw1Q Who let the DOGS out?
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DreamGEMS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,094,298 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@catsgang_bot · 120,1502 postsDogs 🦴
@dogshouse_bot · 214,9662 postsBlum
@BlumCryptoBot · 265,3401 postCatizen
@catizenbot · 85,5261 postDEXLIONS
@dexLions · 2,9151 postDEXT Live New Pairs Bot [Ethereum Blockchain]
@DEXTNewPairsBot · 17,3361 postETH MOONSHOT [LIVE]
@ethmoonshot · 7691 postEthereum New Pairs | DexKoala
@ETHNewPairs · 9,1461 post@ETHTRENDING (LIVE)
@ETHTRENDING · 45,4111 postiToken - Ethereum
@iTokenEthereum · 16,5111 postiToken Locked - Ethereum
@iTokenLockedEthereum · 6,6091 postFlashLoan - ETH
@NeoFlashLoanETH · 5,2921 post@TRENDING (ETH / SOL)
@trending · 495,6721 postSOL趋势DEX监控BOT
@yinghedexsol · 2,0571 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@DreamGEMS named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Gems” (@DreamGEMS), 139 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DreamGEMS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.