2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 162–164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 16:31
163
no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:35
163
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
1
Videos
3
Links
23
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
173 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
81
46.8%
❤
32
18.5%
👍
22
12.7%
👎
13
7.51%
👏
11
6.36%
🤯
4
2.31%
🥰
3
1.73%
🤔
2
1.16%
🤩
2
1.16%
💩
1
0.578%
😢
1
0.578%
😱
1
0.578%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2022 to 6 April 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
15.0%
3 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1,490
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,020
over 17 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2022 to 6 April 2022. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Crypto Twitter is for BOOMERS?! TikTok is obviously the future of crypto marketing, that's why $TTI is going viral.
$TTI - TikToker Inu is making waves as the first viral TikTok coin that supports TikTokers!🕺💃
💥Join the $TTI viral movement!💥
LINK: https://linktr.ee/tiktokerinu
🚀🚀🚀🚀 MEISHU 🚀🚀🚀🚀
MEISHU is a NextGen Gaming, Music, and Utility Token that offers users a whole new level of experience in the crypto-verse.
✅ A strong shill team
✅ KYC & Audited
✅ Detailed and Precise Litepaper
✅ Listed on Coingecko
✅ Listed on CMC
It is certain that MEISHU will become the biggest name in the crypto-verse 💥💥💥
🗣TG: https://t.me/meishu_official
💵💰OVERVIEW💰💵
📝Contract
0x40…
https://www.carteldao.org/
CartelDao
https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0xf7f3cac01b4db3facb7a0caec343cb2de650e2c3
Just launched gonna ape a bit here Clean and well put together website
Cartel is a DAO designed to create a systematic unilateral voting infrastructure controlled by the holders of the token
They’re going to have 3 phases
Phase 1 : Cartel Token
Phase 2 : Cartel NFT
Phase 3: Cartel DAO
…
Be on the look out stealth launch will be within the next couple hours
pINUchio ($NOSE)
Portal https://t.me/noseentryportal
Website Pinuch.io
Twitter @pinuchio_crypto
#DogeZIlla is live on #ERC20 to take over, after breaking the world records on the #BSC side.
Bridge and #ZillaVerse is coming Q3.
This is a sneakpeak video for the NFTs on #ZillaVerse MarketPlace.
🗨 https://t.me/DogeZillaPortal
🌐 https://dogezillacoin.com
🐦 https://twitter.com/DogeZillaCoin
DogeZilla Is on bsc and went to 450m MC they just launched the ERC side and its mooning 0 tax I aped LFG 🚀🚀🚀
Chart: https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0xe6eb93faac0fcfefbc125b71d7bf1c216fd3bb15
TG: https://t.me/DogeZillaPortal
🧋BOBATEA LAUNCH🧋
BOBATEA ($TEA) is launching today at 7 pm EST / 11 pm UTC!
The token utility is a LOTTERY fund. Earn prizes daily from the $TEA bag fund. All you have to do, is hold $TEA tokens for a chance to win!
Up to 10 winners daily!
✅ Experienced Marketing Team
🪙 Tokenomics - 12% buy/sell
0️⃣ NO team tokens
🚀 100% FAIRLAUNCH
🧑💻 SAFU Dev ( MISA )
AUDIT / WHITEPAPER
☎️ https://t.me/BOBATEA_ETH
🌎 https://w…
♞ DINO APE ♞ ERC ♞ P2E NFT GAMING PROJECT ♞ LAUNCHING 6-8PM UTC TODAY ♞
New project called Dino Ape with some dope NFTs. 🔥 Previews attached!
Team has worked on projects such as SINU, Aurum & Moonboys previously. (All went above 10m market cap)
Dino Ape is the Governance token for the P2E game, NFT Collection and NFT Index. They are creating a P2E game where users will be rewarded in tokens, $DAPE, $ETH and trendi…
$SHIV is a DAO backed NFT fund. Only a few weeks old and reached $4.5M without CG or CMC
Already sat on $90,000 worth of assets in the community NFT portfolio
Perfect entry point before it’s next run 🚀
Based team, very active, strong community!
Virtual gallery: https://oncyber.io/spaces/udrNKKT0SIeDCftrr3tN
Chart: https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0xd8264b532a0a6c4a883eb4314c005c8ccad57f31
TG: htt…
$iAPE launched this morning and went through the typical pump.
Jeets are out and now it is starting to reverse.
This is a great entry! With a $27,000 MC this is going to be easy to blow up!
https://twitter.com/idiotapetoken
https://t.me/IdiotApes
https://dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x06875114d605d6059e7173edede87b5eaff9ef1e
🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DrakeBellCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,005,285 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
10
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
10
vacant every time we have ever looked
@DrakeBellCalls named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@dogezillaportal named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@drakebell named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@howlertoken named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@hypeapeseth named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@katz_bsc named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@meishu_official named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@pinuchio_crypto named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@thepastproject named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@carteldaoerc named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@yachtclubinu named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Truther’s calls by Drake Bell” (@DrakeBellCalls), 163 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrakeBellCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.