Channel
@DrSteckaya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
219subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002090082460 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DrSteckaya |
| Description | Мы публикуем интересные факты/рекорды/крутые события 📮По всем вопросам - @azzamat_D |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DrSteckaya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:23 | 219 | no change |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:47 | 219 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
10 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 30.0% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2024 to 6 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DrSteckaya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 August 2024 to 6 October 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#история В 1889 году во время открытия Эйфелевой башни многие парижане считали её ужасно уродливой и требовали её сноса после выставки. Однако со временем башня стала символом Парижа и одной из самых узнаваемых достопримечательностей в мире. 👍 @trueefactsonly
❤2👍1
#наука Около 90% данных в мире было создано за последние два года С развитием интернета объём данных вырос колоссально. Каждый день люди генерируют огромное количество информации(примерно 320 млн терабайт😱)— от постов в социальных сетях до данных с датчиков умных устройств 📈Для сравнения, за всё время до 2010 года было создано меньше данных, чем за один год в наше время. 👍 @trueefactsonly
👏2
Миф или факт: В пустыне Сахара может идти снег?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А вы знаете, почему фламинго розовые?🦩 ⏪Фламинго становятся розовыми из-за своего питания. Они едят мелких рачков и водоросли, которые содержат каротиноиды — пигменты, придающие еде красный и оранжевый цвета. Без этих пигментов фламинго были бы серыми⏩ 👍 @trueefactsonly
❤1
Миф или факт: Люди и динозавры существовали в одно время?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Миф или факт: Хрустеть суставами вредно и приводит к артриту❔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Миф или факт: Осьминоги имеют три сердца?🥉
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Миф или факт: Слоны никогда не забывают?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#случайный_факт В языке хопи, одном из коренных языков американских индейцев, существует более 100 слов, обозначающих различные оттенки цвета синего. Это связано с тем, что у хопи синяя палитра имеет огромное культурное значение 👍 @trueefactsonly
Миф или факт: Вакцины могут вызвать заболевание, от которого они защищают?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что появилось на Земле раньше: акулы или деревья❔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Миф или факт: У летучих мышей полностью отсутствует зрение?👀
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DrSteckaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Миф или факт: В пустыне Сахара может идти снег?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Миф или факт: Люди и динозавры существовали в одно время?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Миф или факт: Хрустеть суставами вредно и приводит к артриту❔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Миф или факт: Осьминоги имеют три сердца?🥉
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Миф или факт: Слоны никогда не забывают?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Миф или факт: Вакцины могут вызвать заболевание, от которого они защищают?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2024 to 6 October 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Факт” (@DrSteckaya), 219 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrSteckaya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.