Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Канал Dr.Seliverstov

Channel

Канал Dr.Seliverstov

@DrSeliverstov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

260subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001840573504
TypeChannel
Username@DrSeliverstov
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/DrSeliverstov

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

243260251.57 August 2026 — 245 subscribers8 August 2026 — 245 subscribers16 August 2026 — 243 subscribers24 August 2026 — 248 subscribers31 August 2026 — 247 subscribers10 September 2026 — 251 subscribers18 September 2026 — 255 subscribers3 October 2026 — 257 subscribers12 October 2026 — 260 subscribers7 August 202612 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 66 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 240–263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 15:28260+3
3 Oct 2026, 00:57257+2
18 Sept 2026, 12:18255+4
10 Sept 2026, 06:37251+4
31 Aug 2026, 01:14247-1
24 Aug 2026, 05:24248+5
16 Aug 2026, 03:49243-2
8 Aug 2026, 09:35245no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:09245first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 44s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2367.6%
🔥823.5%
🎉12.94%
🏆12.94%
💯12.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC29 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Проверка правильно отработанного положения челюсти на СПЛИНТАХ или временных конструкциях по отношению к ВНЧС и микро корректировка в последующем при необходимости, обеспечивает максимально предсказуемый результат , если это проходит через аксиографию на аппарате Рощина у @drseliverstov в клинике @applestom

👍2

Signed Артём Селивёрстов

31 Jul 2026, 06:39 UTC58 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вчера у меня @drseliverstov был ДР и свои 43 я начал отмечать будучи на приеме в клинике @applestom моего прекрасного пациента @victorshaytar После 7 месяцев СПЛИНТ терапии провели контрольную аксиографию для анализа проделанной работы по лечению ВНЧС . Сейчас Виктору предстоит переход на временные конструкции в комбинированной работе на 28 единицах с имплантатами, а после уже на постоянные конструкции из керамики. П…

👍5🎉1

Signed Артём Селивёрстов

28 Jul 2026, 05:57 UTC64 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не знаю там как у кого, но у @drseliverstov в клинике @applestom всегда предсказуемый результат с учетом функции и здоровья, а из этих двух составляющих вытекает и красота. Если у вас есть проблемы с ВНЧС и не только , тогда для записи в директ 👌 Проводим качественную аксиографию на аппарате Рощина

👍2🔥2

Signed Артём Селивёрстов

26 Jul 2026, 21:23 UTC68 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А вот и дивайс новый… теперь сочнее и красивее и каждую деталь не упустить от зоркого взора @drseliverstov

👍3

Signed Артём Селивёрстов

24 Jul 2026, 08:09 UTC77 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Результат сразу после фиксации керамических реставрации от @drseliverstov в клинике @applestom

🔥5🏆1

Signed Артём Селивёрстов

23 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC76 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

РЕФРАКТОРЫ 12 единиц. Я скажу , что это охуенно, когда зубной техник, врач и пациент на одной волне. Согласны?

👍4💯1

Signed Артём Селивёрстов

22 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC74 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Высота больше 3500м. Это было эпично! ПОЛНУЮ версию можно посмотреть у меня на одноименном канале в разделе видео на YouTube 💯 Автор видео @drseliverstov Съемка @drseliverstov Редактор видео @drseliverstov

👍3

Signed Артём Селивёрстов

21 Jul 2026, 05:41 UTC73 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍3

Signed Артём Селивёрстов

16 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC104 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Артём Селивёрстов

16 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC115 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мост расшатался и слетел , оба корня 11 и 22 зуба треснули и не подлежали восстановлению классическим способом реставраций , но одномоментная имплантация за 1,5 часа решила вопрос беззубия, и пациент ушел с временным мостом, сделанным по силиконовому ключу исходника из пластика прямо в день операции. Через 2 месяца мы установим фрезерованный правильной анатомии временный мост и скорректируем мягкие ткани. А еще через…

👍1🔥1

Signed Артём Селивёрстов

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @DrSeliverstov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Канал Dr.Seliverstov” (@DrSeliverstov), 260 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrSeliverstov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.