Channel
@DrProfitReviews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
288subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001877950825 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DrProfitReviews |
| Created | 12 February 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DrProfitReviews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 288 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 288 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 12 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
39 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 38.5% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 30.8% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 25.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.56% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 2.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2023 to 14 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
You wonder what premium members think about the service ? ⬇️ Reviews are in comment section ⬇️ https://twitter.com/drprofitcrypto/status/1679708335786848258?s=46&t=DQb3oFKsGs4bhPFLACHBfg You want to join? Contact @DrProfitPremium
❤7
You wonder what premium members think about the service ? ⬇️ Reviews are in comment section https://twitter.com/drprofitcrypto/status/1641818393517932547?s=46&t=DQb3oFKsGs4bhPFLACHBfg You want to join? Contact @DrProfitPremium
❤3👍2
More than 100 verified reviews from premium members ✔️ My focus in terms of trading, insights, analysis and ideas remains in the premium only If you want to belong to the inner circle, feel free to contact @DrProfitPremium
❤1
Premium members telling you how they paid for the subscription and immediately got it back with one of the provided trades. That’s the deal we sake 👊 Join: @DrProfitPremium
❤3👍2🔥2❤🔥1👀1
𝘗𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘢 𝘮𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘨𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘺𝘰𝘶
🔥4👍1
𝘗𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘦𝘸𝘴 (𝘙𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘴) https://twitter.com/DrProfitCrypto/status/1617614172745011202?s=20&t=J6lwfcRMgy6pEi12Pf-JQg https://twitter.com/drprofitcrypto/status/1596937289296322560?s=46&t=vDWpiXimIqwHjKaX2zjWhg https://twitter.com/drprofitcrypto/status/1596937289296322560?s=46&t=vDWpiXimIqwHjKaX2zjWhg https://twitter.com/drprofitcrypto/status/1589962713140461569?s=21 https://twitter.com/drprofitcry…
👍3🔥2
𝘔𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 1500 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 🗳️ 𝘚𝘦𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘰𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘪𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘺 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘤 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘸𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘥𝘰𝘤𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭. 𝘔𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 3500 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘫𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥, 𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘧 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘵𝘰𝘰𝘬 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴. 𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘢𝘪𝘥 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘱 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵. 𝘕𝘰 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘥𝘰𝘤. 𝘛𝘰 𝘫𝘰𝘪𝘯: @DrProfitPremium
🔥4👍2❤1
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @DrProfitReviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 583,144 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Reviews from members” (@DrProfitReviews), 288 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrProfitReviews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.