This low seems to be holding nicely. A potential relief rally under way. Target is 96k-116k. If we go beyond that then it is likely the bull market has one last leg up.
❤1🔥1
Channel
@DrPhilDeCrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
238subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001523802891 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DrPhilDeCrypto |
| Description | DrPhil Market Watch & Analysis Learn from my journey, #NFA, #DYOR It is a free service! However, if it helped you make money and you wish to give back, please donate to my charitable work here - 0x9E9D8E3aD17c5CAa19E94A9097E6b39350F08aEf |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DrPhilDeCrypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 238 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 238 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
61 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 11 | 18.0% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 16.4% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 8.20% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 8.20% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 8.20% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 8.20% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 8.20% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 4.92% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 4.92% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 1.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 2 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
This low seems to be holding nicely. A potential relief rally under way. Target is 96k-116k. If we go beyond that then it is likely the bull market has one last leg up.
❤1🔥1
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Federal Reserve officially ends quantitative tightening. @WatcherGuru
🔥1
😂😂 https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1AEP8VyaJJ/
🤣8
Both the weekly and monthly charts are showing a broken bull-market trend. Unless something significant changes, it looks like the top may already be in. From here on, I’m treating any rallies as relief rallies. I could be completely wrong—and I’m happy to be wrong, since more upside benefits all of us—but there’s a strong chance that BTC has already topped.
💩5😱1
Let's see how long the relief rally lasts.
👌2😭1
80.6k held for now but don't forget this is a range between 81k-74k. Nothing is absolute in this crazy Crypto season but maybe, just maybe, a local bottom can form around this range, otherwise the break of the range can open the door for a retest of last bull cycle top: 69k. There is a very strong support there. Infact, if such a price is reached, I may slowly get back in the little I have left from this nasty bull r…
🔥4👍2👎1🤡1🤣1🙏1
And the draw down continues. BTC dropping like a stone. Next logical support is between 81k - 74k. From there we shall assess the way forward.
🌚1👍1😱1
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US economy added 119,000 jobs in September, higher than expectations. @WatcherGuru
Yet, we Crypto OGs are panicking, LOL😂🤪
🤣2
🚨 JUST IN: EL SALVADOR ANNOUNCES ITS LARGEST SINGLE-DAY BITCOIN PURCHASE El Salvador has acquired 1,090 BTC for approximately $100 million. The purchase, which comes as the price of BTC dips below $90,000, boosts its total holdings to 7,474 BTC valued at about $676 million.
BTC is moving away from individual Whales to institutions. Watch them send it to $1mil+ over the next 10 -16 years.
💯3🔥2
What a Chad!
🤩5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @DrPhilDeCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DrPhil_DeCrypto” (@DrPhilDeCrypto), 238 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrPhilDeCrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.