Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Dr. Paul Alexander

@DrPaulAlexander

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,534subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001553489149
TypeChannel
Username@DrPaulAlexander
DescriptionDr. Paul E. Alexander, clinical epidemiologist, former WHO-PAHO and US HHS consultant/senior Covid Pandemic advisor
Created31 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DrPaulAlexander

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@DrPaulAlexander/8027 · this entry29 May 2026, 19:04 UTC@PhilipMcMillan/218929 May 2026, 19:06 UTC1.002 minutes
@DrPaulAlexander/8031 · this entry5 Jun 2026, 19:12 UTC@PhilipMcMillan/21925 Jun 2026, 19:12 UTC1.00under a minute
@DrPaulAlexander/8033 · this entry22 Jun 2026, 19:27 UTC@PhilipMcMillan/219622 Jun 2026, 19:28 UTC1.00under a minute
@DrPaulAlexander/8036 · this entry10 Jul 2026, 19:04 UTC@PhilipMcMillan/219810 Jul 2026, 19:06 UTC1.002 minutes
@DrPaulAlexander/8039 · this entry12 Jul 2026, 19:36 UTC@PhilipMcMillan/220112 Jul 2026, 19:36 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@PhilipMcMillan5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutesthis entry (50)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 23 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 May 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @DrPaulAlexander — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

8,5348,5628,5486 August 2026 — 8,562 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,562 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,547 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,534 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,530–8,566 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:188,534-13
9 Aug 2026, 13:238,547-15
6 Aug 2026, 10:188,562no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:558,562first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 29 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.17%
avg views ÷ 8,534 subscribers
Avg views / post
441
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.601%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held23 (29 May 20266 August 2026)
Views total4,411
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
95
Videos
159
Links
7,980

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
17m 17s
Average length
2m 28s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1350.0%
👍415.4%
👎415.4%
🤮27.69%
😡13.85%
🤡13.85%
🤪13.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 23:59 UTC327 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Tucker Carlson for President in 2028? Seems so! "MAGA Is In Turmoil Over Tucker Carlson's Possible 2028 Presidential Bid Joe Kent says that he and other anti-Donald Trump MAGA figures have formed a https://palexander.substack.com/p/tucker-carlson-for-president-in-2028 Join 👇🏻 https://t.me/DrPaulAlexander

3🤮2🤡1

6 Aug 2026, 21:24 UTC301 viewsread 12 August 2026

J. Robert Oppenheimer: "I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds." Oppenheimer tried to apologizer, he was saying he was sorry for the atom bomb he helped create! People like Malone Bourla Bancel https://palexander.substack.com/p/j-robert-oppenheimer-i-am-become Join 👇🏻 https://t.me/DrPaulAlexander

6 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC292 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Looking for life-changing reads? Barbara O’Neill shares her top 3 must-read books for health, personal growth, and inspiration. Most people spend years searching for better health... these books could save you that time. 📚🌿 People are buying these books faster than we expected... Everyone is talking about these books... One collection. Hundreds of practical wellness insights. Thousands of happy readers. 1. Barbara

4 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC347 viewsread 12 August 2026

'US has used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war'; if this reporting is true as Iran has strengthened due to OPERATION QUICKSAND, then this Iran war decision is WORSE https://substack.com/home/post/p-209787279 Join 👇🏻 https://t.me/DrPaulAlexander

26 Jul 2026, 21:28 UTC568 viewsread 12 August 2026

Oil tanker slams into naval mine in Hormuz & this just got uglier, POTUS Trump now must consider next steps, Iran said no traffic! This as the Houthis engage in Red Sea threatens to close it; Trump WH https://palexander.substack.com/p/oil-tanker-slams-into-naval-mine Join 👇🏻 https://t.me/DrPaulAlexander

26 Jul 2026, 19:06 UTC487 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

An extremely effective remedy has been found that will restore your teeth, oral cavity and create a powerful probiotic defense! ✅ Everything shown in the video is a new breakthrough in dental care and the restoration of beneficial bacteria, which in turn protect your body. 💯 100% natural formula that is very effective and has been tested by thousands of Americans. I recommend it to everyone who wants to get rid of

👎1

23 Jul 2026, 19:04 UTC515 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

I wish someone had shown me this years ago... 🌿📖 Thousands of people swear by Barbara O'Neill's natural wellness advice—and after flipping through this book, it's easy to see why. One chapter in, and you'll understand why so many families keep Barbara O'Neill's books on their shelves. Learn how to heal without chemicals. Free Shipping Worldwide - Order Now👇💚 If you want to live healthy, buy the book today. 👇👇👇👇👇 h

23 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC434 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Is it ok for Saudi to go nuclear? Who made this decision within USA to do this? Does this weaken the US and Israel argument that Iran cannot be nuclear? Is Saudi as big a threat? why or why not? your https://palexander.substack.com/p/is-it-ok-for-saudi-to-go-nuclear Join 👇🏻 https://t.me/DrPaulAlexander

2

17 Jul 2026, 13:21 UTC583 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Oleander, they would have killed POTUS Trump right there in the OVAL office of White House had it not been for my boss & I & our deep dive into the Oleander plant & INSANE psychotic people wanting to https://palexander.substack.com/p/oleander-they-would-have-killed-potus Join 👇🏻 https://t.me/DrPaulAlexander

👍2

16 Jul 2026, 17:43 UTC557 viewsread 12 August 2026

120 Horsemen of COVID Apocalypse (update as of July 15th 2026) (as the Iran US Israel war heats up); key people to be DRAGGED into proper legal courts-tribunal for their role in imposing lockdowns & https://palexander.substack.com/p/120-horsemen-of-covid-apocalypse-492 Join 👇🏻 https://t.me/DrPaulAlexander

12 Jul 2026, 19:36 UTC641 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

📌Most people don't realize what happens if they don't have a Living Trust... until it's too late. This step-by-step guide explains how Living Trusts work, how they may help you avoid probate, and how to better protect your family's future. Protect Your Family's Future Today Step-by-Step 2026 Edition👇 https://shortll.com/TrustsBook https://shortll.com/TrustsBook

11 Jul 2026, 15:34 UTC534 viewsread 12 August 2026

Tehran Iran holds Strait of Hormuz like how the Outlaw Josie Suzie Wales Wiles holds RFK Bobby Jr. testicles balls in her hands, a vice grip where he cannot make a note, he is locked in on mRNA deadly https://palexander.substack.com/p/tehran-iran-holds-strait-of-hormuz Join 👇🏻 https://t.me/DrPaulAlexander

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @DrPaulAlexander. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 697,889 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dr. Paul Alexander” (@DrPaulAlexander), 8,534 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrPaulAlexander.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.