Channel
@DrJayBhattacharya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
176subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002385311116 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DrJayBhattacharya |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 29 November 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DrJayBhattacharya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 176 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 177 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 177 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
162 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 71 | 43.8% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 24.1% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 12.3% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 9.26% | |
| 💯 | 13 | 8.02% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 2.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 November 2024 to 13 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
High drug prices are bankrupting Americans and our country. It’s long past time for our colleagues in other countries to step-up and pay into the cost of drug research and development. @DrJayBhattacharya
🤔2
In 2022, the @NIH terminated a subaward to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. American taxpayers had for years been sending money there to fund dangerous gain of function research. Wuhan refused to turn over lab notebooks that the NIH demanded. https://thebulletin.org/2022/08/nih-to-terminate-ecohealth-alliance-grant-after-its-wuhan-partners-refuse-to-deliver-information-on-coronavirus-studies/ @DrJayBhattacharya
🔥3👍2
@DrJayBhattacharya
👏3
@DrJayBhattacharya
👏8
“Sec. Kennedy has asked me to initiate a study on the cause of the rise in autism. It's a question that is at the front of the minds of so many parents … yet scientific progress on this has been slow because scientists are frankly scared to ask the question.” @DrJayBhattacharya
👍13🔥5❤4🤔1
NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya on mRNA tech: "The next step is [to halt] the mRNA platform itself... the manufacturer has no idea what dose they're giving, no idea where it goes in the body, and whether they are producing off-target antigens" @DrJayBhattacharya
👏22💯7👍1🤔1
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: “The idea that we can have a culture where authority determines what's true and false in science is the very antithesis of science.” “If there are dissenting scientific cues, people who disagree with me, they should have a say.” “We should be encouraging a culture where scientists can talk to each other without fear of reprisals, without fear of suppression, and without fear of censorship.” “…
👏13💯2
Well said, Dr. Bhattacharya. Prioritizing gold-standard science is essential in our mission to Make America Healthy Again. @DrJayBhattacharya
❤7👏5
"How as a regulator do you say, Ok you can give this product to people even though; 1. You don't know the dose you are giving to people 2. You don't know where it is going in the body 3. You don't know that you are producing the target antigen you want to produce and not off target antigens as well. As a future platform (mRNA platform), there is going to need to be 2 or 3 more Nobel Prize winning advances before thi…
❤9👍2
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: “Science should be an engine for knowledge and freedom, not something that stands on top of society and says you must do this or else.” “It shouldn’t be pushing covid vaccines.” “The proper role of scientists in a pandemic is to answer basic questions that policy makers have about what the right policy should be.” “The role of scientists shouldn’t be to say you can’t send your kids to school …
👍6💯4👏2
Science bureaucrats abused their authority to create an illusion of scientific consensus in favor of destructive ideas. …With such a litany of failure, the American people deserve an honest COVID commission. @DrJayBhattacharya
👏8🔥2👍1
"Lockdowns were an catastrophic mistake that never should be repeated. ... They violated not just medical ethics, but also crushed the ability of scientists to openly discuss with each other facts and evidence. Many scientists were abused and silenced. ... The restoration of the freedom for scientists to discuss with one another openly what the evidence actually says without this fear of repression that we have seen …
👏6👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DrJayBhattacharya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@DrJayBhattacharya named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr Jay Bhattacharya” (@DrJayBhattacharya), 176 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrJayBhattacharya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.