Channel
@DrHAKEM
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
9,764subscribers
-168 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001003732624 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DrHAKEM |
| Description | الأمين العام لمؤتمر الأمة ورئيس حزب الأمة في الكويت أستاذ الحديث والتفسير - جامعة الكويت |
| Created | 31 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DrHAKEM |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 22:46 | 9,764 | -8 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 01:15 | 9,772 | -12 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 17:58 | 9,784 | -6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 9,790 | -2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 9,792 | -12 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 9,804 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:20 | 9,809 | -5 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:41 | 9,814 | -6 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 11:40 | 9,820 | -11 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 13:15 | 9,831 | -4 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 17:40 | 9,835 | -15 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 09:19 | 9,850 | +68 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:02 | 9,782 | -12 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:02 | 9,794 | -4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 9,798 | -17 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 9,815 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:35 | 9,825 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 9,835 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 9,844 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 9,850 | first reading |
62 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 62 (11 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 21,724 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 23:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
حديث زيد سبق الإجابة عنه وهو موقوف عليه من اجتهاده فلا حجة فيه، وهو يعارض حديث الكساء أصلا، حيث أدخل في (أهل البيت) ذوي القربى من بني هاشم كلهم فجعل لفظ (ذوي القربى) مرادفا للفظ (أهل البيت)! ولم يفرق بين (بيت النبي وآله) نسبا، وهم بيت عبدالمطلب بن هاشم، فهذا البيت لا نزاع في النسبة إليه أصلا فهو البيت الذي يعزى إليه النبي ﷺ وعلي والعباس وذريتهم وكل بني هاشم، وإنما النزاع وقع في من هم (أهل البيت) في آية التطهير حصرا، …
Photo, posted without a caption
راجع كلام الطحاوي في نقل الإجماع وكل ما ذكرته في نقدك لا يعدو أن يكون ظنا في إثبات دخول فاطمة وعلي والحسن والحسين في اسم (أهل البيت) وليس هذا محل الخلاف! وإنما الخلاف في ذرية السبطين الذين لم يدركوا النبي ﷺ ولا عاشوا في كنفه وفي بيته هل يصدق عليهم حقيقة أنهم (أهل بيته) وأنهم (ذريته)؟ وأقوال العلماء يستدل لها لا بها فلا تغني شيئا عند التحقيق والتحرير! وعيسى عليه السلام لا يقاس عليه غيره فهو ابن مريم لا أب له أصلا ولو …
Photo, posted without a caption
وهذه الفتنة السلالية الجاهلية في اليمن -التي اتخذت من شعار (آل البيت) الطاهر ذريعة للطبقية المجتمعية، وسفك دماء المسلمين، وإثارة الفتن بينهم، وقتل الأبرياء للوصول إلى السلطة والحكم بدعوى الاصطفاء الإلهي لهم- هي السبئية التي ابتدعها عبد الله بن سبأ، ولا علاقة لها بالهاشمية النسبية الشريفة، فالهاشميون: سواء الطالبيون منهم أو العباسيون كانوا وما زالوا من خيار المسلمين في كل بلد إسلامي دينا ومروءة وصلاحا وعلما، وفيهم علم…
سبئيون لا هاشميون 📩 س/ شيخنا نواجه في اليمن فتنة (السلالية) وهي فتنة كبرى يدعي أصحابها أنهم (أهل البيت النبوي) ويدّعون اختصاصهم بالفضل والشرف والحكم والخمس حتى صار المجتمع اليمني كله عندهم طبقتين أشرافا هاشميين وغير أشراف! فما الحكم الشرعي تجاهها؟ ▫️ج/ هذه نفسها فتنة بني إسرائيل من قبل حتى ادعوا أنهم أبناء الله وأحباؤه وأصفياؤه لأنهم أبناء إبراهيم من زوجته سارة التي قالت الملائكة لها: ﴿رحمت الله وبركاته عليكم أه…
Photo, posted without a caption
الإجابة عن عدم شمول لفظ (آل البيت) جميع القرابة حياك الله وبارك فيك وفتح عليك.. أولا: لا يصلح في باب الجدل اتخاذ الدعوى محل النزاع نفسها دليلا ولا الاحتجاج على المخالف بالدليل الظني موضع الخلاف! والخلاف في هذه النصوص والاستدلال بها وقع بين الصحابة أنفسهم كما في صحيح مسلم رقم ١٨١٢ عن سؤال نجدة الحروري ابن عباس عن سهم ذوي القربى لمن هو؟ ومن هم ذوو القربى؟ فقال ابن عباس (زعمنا أنا نحن هم وأبى علينا قومنا ذلك)! والذي أ…
Photo, posted without a caption
أيها المسلمون أغيثوا أهل #غزة #غزة_تغرق 📎 ﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎ @DrHAKEM
شكر الله لكل من حضر أو اتصل أو أرسل معزيا ومواسيا بفقيدنا مطلق العبيسان وكتب الله أجركم جميعا ولا أراكم مكروها بعزيز آمين آمين ﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎ @DrHAKEM
اللهم ارفع درجته وأكرم نزله واجعل هذا اليوم خير أيامه واجعل ما أصابه كفارة وشهادة ولا تفتنا بعده ولا تحرمنا أجره اللهم آمين آمين.. ودعتُه - أمسٍ - رجاءَ لقاءِ واليوم أفجع فيه بالأنباءِ كذّبتُ أخبار الوفاة وإنما وهمٌ أحاول يا لطول عنائي! غادرتَ عالمنا كما قد عشتَه بسكينةٍ وعزيمةٍ ومضاءِ كفارة ما قد أصابك ضره في جنة الفردوس في الشهداءِ ﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎ @DrHAKEM
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @DrHAKEM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 2 posts on @DrHAKEM as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | No label recorded on this Wikidata item |
|---|---|
| Description | politician |
| X / Twitter | @DrHAKEM |
| Official site | http://www.dr-hakem.com/ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة أ.د. حاكم المطيري” (@DrHAKEM), 9,764 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrHAKEM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.