Channel
@DrAseemMalhotra
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
388subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001808536492 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DrAseemMalhotra |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DrAseemMalhotra |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 388 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 387 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 388 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 389 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 389 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
378 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 167 | 44.2% | |
| 👍 | 125 | 33.1% | |
| 👏 | 38 | 10.1% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 2.65% | |
| 🙏 | 10 | 2.65% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 2.38% | |
| 🤬 | 6 | 1.59% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 1.06% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.794% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.529% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.529% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.265% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.265% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 378 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
It was five years ago today that my beloved father, Dr Kailash Chand Malhotra OBE, suffered an unexpected cardiac arrest and died. One year later, Andy Burnham unveiled a plaque in his honour at the GP surgery where he devoted his life to serving his patients. The speech I gave that day remains as relevant now as it was then, and I’ve shared it again below. My father’s death changed the course of my life. It force…
❤17👍4🙏2
The UK’s No.1 News Channel just covered testimony given in US Congress - as to why the Covid Boosters caused Cancer. World renowned Oncologist Angus Dalgleish explains: “People cleared of Cancer started relapsing - they all had been given Boosters” “It’s simple - Boosters @DrAseemMalhotra
❤16👍5👏5
Dr. Aseem Malhotra testifies about MASSIVE truth bombs on mRNA vaccine harms, scientific corruption, and the betrayal of public trust. “I have called for a MORATORIUM on these UNSAFE and DEFECTIVE products…there is SERIOUS HARM…” THIS IS WHAT BRAVERY LOOKS LIKE… @DrAseemMalhotra
❤18👏9🙏3
BREAKING MSN NEWS : ‘We are facing a pandemic of the vaccine injured with possibility that hundreds of thousands of americans killed from covid mrna vaccine in 2021 alone’ ‘A global moratorium on covid mrna vaccines needs to take place until the evidence of benefits and harms is independently evaluated’ ‘Calls supported by leading international oncologist, vaccine developer, immunolgist and psychologist’ https://…
❤15❤🔥3
😂😂😂 @DrAseemMalhotra
👍8🤣2
I’m afraid one of Britain’s most eminent oncologists Professor Angus Dalgleish may well be right on the covid ‘vaccines’ fuelling cancer. This study published in a very respected high impact journal is significant and concerning https://biomarkerres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40364-025-00831-w @DrAseemMalhotra
🤬6😢3
BREAKING: The Prime Minister has just attacked and lied about me in Parliament 1. I did NOT state that ‘vaccines are linked to cancer’ I was presenting information about the possible link of the covid mRNA vaccine and cancer from US HHS data and quoting oncologist Professor Angus Dalgleish ‘it’s highly likely that the covid vaccines have been a significant factor in cancer of members of the royal family’ 2. Confl…
❤22💯3🙏3
‘Since covid and the disaster that the medical establishment inflicted on people and the lies that were told people have lost confidence in the medical establishment’ THIS is why uptake of traditional childhood vaccines has gone down. Trust will not be restored until the medical establishment admit they made a terrible mistake, apologise, dedicate resources to help those who are vaccine injured (and still at risk) &…
👍10❤4
I'm pro freedom of speech. But the fckng retards who keep rooting for Big Pharma by bullying everybody as an anti-vaxxer, yes they deserve some extraordinary shit in their lives. @DrAseemMalhotra
❤3
Is it time to arrest all those using the term ‘anti - vaxxer’ because it’s a term of abuse, especially when used to describe someone vaccine injured, or has lost a relative or a child because of it ? It’s absolutely disgusting @DrAseemMalhotra
👍15💯5👏1
2 months ago I was honoured to receive ‘excellence in public health communication’ award at the Global Health Awards held in the House of Commons. I made it very clear in my keynote speech & interview with Zee TV that the covid mRNA gene technology had overall done more harm than good. It was attended by leaders in the field of medicine, healthcare industry and politicians. The feedback was overwhelmingly positive i…
❤9👍5👏1
LADAPO: “In medical ethics, you cannot obtain informed consent for a medical treatment if there's coercion. And a mandate is coercion.” 🎯 @DrAseemMalhotra
❤5🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DrAseemMalhotra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@DrAseemMalhotra named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr Aseem Malhotra” (@DrAseemMalhotra), 388 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrAseemMalhotra.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.