Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dolotov Store Reviews

Channel

Dolotov Store Reviews

@Dotovreviews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001945233695
TypeChannel
Username@Dotovreviews
DescriptionОтзывы
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Dotovreviews

Growth

127 August 2026 — 12 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11–13 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 04:4612no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:5012first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 27 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
50
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

28 Mar 2026, 15:44 UTC22 viewsread 12 August 2026

Заказал у данного продавца кроссовки, всегда был на связи, сообщал о статусе заказа. Посылка целая, пришла в срок. Товар оригинальный. Продавца рекомендую 🚀

8 Feb 2026, 10:47 UTC29 viewsread 12 August 2026

Спасибо большое,все пришло быстрее чем ожидал,по низкой цене за доставку все отлично

29 Jan 2026, 14:29 UTC33 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Заказываю у продавца второй раз,как всегда быстро и качественно!

2 Dec 2025, 22:07 UTC61 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Заказываю уже не первый раз 👍 Товар соответствует описанию, хорошее качество, продавец всегда на связи, отвечает на все вопросы 👌 Очень довольна покупкой! Все супер!

27 Aug 2025, 19:05 UTC93 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

10 на 10 всё в сроки про качество можно и не говорить

11 Jun 2025, 16:28 UTC111 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Все отлично, очень оперативно, быстро списались, быстро был произведен выкуп и отправка. К работе максимально рекомендую😎🤝

3 Jun 2025, 17:51 UTC104 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Отзыв: Кроссовки вообще кайф! По материалам и по ощущениям топ, в трэвисах уже погулял) хочу написать огромное спасибо долоту за такую надежность доставки и приятные цены. Также доставка, в принципе они приехали за 2,5 недели, но из-за чуваков которые не оплачивают сразу доставку, я не мог забрать и по итогу забрал позже, поэтому чуваки не подставляйте братишку долота

29 Mar 2025, 13:14 UTC126 viewsread 12 August 2026

Заказывал у Долот, пару с Пойзона, все пришло отлично, помог с размером ноги, сделал лучшую цену на рынке Большое спасибо😁

19 Mar 2025, 07:52 UTC132 viewsread 12 August 2026

Банальное,что нибудь по типу? Отличный продавец и отличный товар, рекомендую 👍

20 Sept 2024, 16:44 UTC194 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Очень довольна покупкой, всё супер!, спасибо большое)

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Dotovreviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dolotov Store Reviews” (@Dotovreviews), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dotovreviews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.