Channel
@Dornasharifi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
39,273subscribers
-1,374 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001663844956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dornasharifi |
| Description | اینجا تلاش میکنیم دنیای امن تری برای خودمون و بچه هابسازیم😊🌱 ارتباط با ادمین👇 @Dornasharifi_support آدرس وبسایت👇 dornasharifi.com تلفن دفتر مرکزی👇 02191301248 پیج اینستاگرام👇 instagram.com/dornasharifi ساعت پاسخدهی:شنبه تاچهارشنبه 9 تا 16 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dornasharifi |
Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 07:06 | 39,273 | -97 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 01:01 | 39,370 | -120 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 39,490 | -204 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 39,694 | -163 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 39,857 | -46 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 39,903 | -34 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 39,937 | -27 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 39,964 | -36 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:35 | 40,000 | -65 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 40,065 | -101 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 40,166 | -41 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:29 | 40,207 | -24 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:54 | 40,231 | -22 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:12 | 40,253 | -19 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 40,272 | -19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 40,291 | -27 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 40,318 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 40,329 | -27 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 40,356 | -15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 40,371 | first reading |
164 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 65 of 73 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 164 (30 July 2026 – 13 October 2026) |
| Views total | 126,626 |
| Reactions total | 800 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Oct 2026, 17:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,782 reactions across 147 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,499 | 84.1% | |
| 👍 | 116 | 6.51% | |
| 👏 | 59 | 3.31% | |
| 🥰 | 28 | 1.57% | |
| 👌 | 24 | 1.35% | |
| 💔 | 16 | 0.898% | |
| 🕊 | 13 | 0.73% | |
| 😍 | 10 | 0.561% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 0.449% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.224% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.168% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.112% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 149 of the 164 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,782 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 164 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
خبر ویژه ی دپارتمان رضایت عمیق از زندگی درنا شریفی 🤲🏻😇 📌اگه دوست داری از اینجا به بعد زندگیت، وقتی تو آینه به چشمات خیره میشی پر شی از شوق رضایت، این کلاس دو روزه برای توئه 🫵🌱 بزودی ثبت نامش باز میشه، کانال رو پین جا نمونی عزیزدل 💚
❤5
⏰ همین الان آلارمتو ست کن، ساعت 16امروز طبق قولی که داده بودم، یه خبر ویژه داریم 😇
رفیقِ دُرنا🌱 امروز با خودت کمی مهربونتر باش؛ تو تمام روزهایی رو به یاد داری که هیچکس نفهمید چقدر سخت میگذره و این تو بودی که ادامه دادی استوار و امیدوار... ✨
❤10
یکی از aha moment های عمیق زندگیم زمانی بود که فهمیدم تا وقتی حال خودم، اونم از درون، خوب نباشه ❤️🩹نمیتونم فرزند شادی تربیت کنم. عمیقا ایمان دارم، تا وقتی خودم عمیقا احساس رضایت و شکوفایی نکنم نمیتونم فرزند موفقی تربیت کنم... تو با خودت چند چندی رفیق دُرنا؟! حاضری برای احساس رضایت خودت چیکار کنی؟!👇 🔻aha moment یعنی🔻 اون لحظه ایه که یه چیزی، خیلی خوب برات روشن میشه , تو مایه هایِ«آهـــااان فهمیدم»
❤18
امروز بشنویم از زهرا جان و دستاوردهای بی نظیرش🥹 زهرا خودش خواست و تغییر اتفاق افتاد...🌱 هنوزم میشه جوونه زد و رشد کرد رفیق...
👏3😍1
✨این آهنگ رو ده بار گوش کن و تو هم با خودت تکرار کن "باید رفیق آرزو هام باشم🤛🤜"
👏4🔥1🥰1
دُرنا به تک تکتون افتخار میکنه عزیزای دلم💚 این همه جوونــ🌱ـــه...🥲 ✨پشت هر کدوم از این جوونه ها یه دنیا آرزوی خاک خورده پنهان شده...،یه عالمه دیده نشدن😔 اما من همشو با همه ی وجود میبینم و حس میکنم 💚 کنارتم رفیق، کنار تویی که انتخاب کردی، انسانی امیدوار و رو به رشد باقی بمانی...🫂 ❌ فقط یادت نره، این هفته کانال رو پین و باصدا کن، دُرنا با خبرهای ویژه برمیگرده😊🌱
❤2
رُفقای دُرنا🌱 صادقانه بگم، من زندگی راحتی ندارم، گاهی از زیادی و تنوع مشکلات سردرد میگیرم و فقط میرم زیر پتو 😶🌫️ حتی گاهی امکان خوابیدن هم ندارم به خاطر مسئولیتای مختلفم 🥺 پس نمیگم همه چیز گل و بلبله... اما اگه صد هزار بار دیگه برگردم به عقب، باز هم همین مسیر رو با همه ی بالا و پاییناش انتخاب میکنم چون دیدم که اگه از بین دردها رشد 🌱 نکنی، دردها از بین تو رشد میکنن و هیچ دردی، سختتر از روزمرگی نیست! ✨ در کنار …
❤26🕊13😍9
#یادآوری_درنا انتخاب تو کدومه رفیق من؟
❤16
🎧 اگه از منه دُرنا بخوای یه تکنیک برای کل مسیر بگم...🌱 📍همین الان گوش کن و نظرت رو برام بنویس عزیزدل👇
❤9
❌ بچه از رفتارمون یاد میگیره نه حرفا و نصیحت هامون ❌ 🔬این پژوهش علمی، با بررسی ۱۹ مطالعه، اهمیت Observational Learning Process یا «روند یاد گرفتن از راه دیدن و الگو گرفتن از دیگران» رو به درستی نشون میده 👌✨ 📌پس لطفاً، قبل از گیر دادن به بچت، اول از خودت بپرس: «من همون الگویی ام که دوست دارم بچم ازش یاد بگیره؟»
❤10
پیشنهاد ویژه آخر هفته سلام آگاهی به شما 😇 🎬معرفی انیمیشن: لئو🦎 لئو یکی از قشنگ ترین انیمیشن هایی هست که به بچه ها یاد میده چطور چالش های مختلف رو هندل کنند و راحت تر حل مسئله کنن و به خودشون، توانایی هاشون، تلاش هاشون باور داشته باشند✨ داستان یه مارمولک ۷۴ ساله که سالها با یه لاک پشت تو آکواریوم یه مدرسه در فلوریدا گرفتار شدن... درست زمانیکه لئو تصمیم به فرار میگیره تا زندگی خارج از آکواریوم و مدرسه رو تجربه کنه…
❤15
Showing the 12 most recent of 164 posts we hold for @Dornasharifi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Dornasharifi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
رُفقا، بریم سراغ سوپرایز دوممون؟!😍 خیالمون راحت باشه هدیه ی اول رو دریافت کردین ؟!
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
وقتی بچت یه کار اشتباه میکنه و عصبانی میشی 😡، معمولا واکنشت چیه؟!
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
همراه هستین رفقا😇
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
دغدغه ی شما چیه؟!
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
عضو کانال بالا هستی ؟!
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
تونستی کتاب رو کامل بخونی؟!
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 164 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 13 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال درنا شریفی سلام آگاهی” (@Dornasharifi), 39,273 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dornasharifi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.