Doraemon 100X Calls pinned a photo

Channel
Doraemon 100X Calls
@Dorammon100XCalls
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22,966subscribers
+10,311 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001538406350 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dorammon100XCalls |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dorammon100XCalls |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 22,966 | -32 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 22,998 | -51 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 23,049 | -33 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 23,082 | -24 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 23,106 | -21 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 23,127 | -19 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 23,146 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 23,154 | +5,214 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 17,940 | +5,778 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 12,162 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 12,171 | -47 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 12,218 | -26 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 12,244 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 12,246 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:19 | 12,252 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 12,261 | -15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 12,276 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 12,281 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 12,285 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 12,291 | first reading |
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.04%
- avg views ÷ 22,966 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,390
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.78%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (22 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 8,316 |
| Reactions total | 231 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 08:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 10s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,203 reactions across 21 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 248 | 20.6% | |
| 👍 | 230 | 19.1% | |
| ❤ | 220 | 18.3% | |
| 🎉 | 207 | 17.2% | |
| 🤩 | 159 | 13.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 139 | 11.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,203 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔥Robinhood DOGE-1 ▶️Elon's Dogecoin-funded meme satellite, reimagined on Robinhood Chain. 💵Hold $DOGE1 and automatically earn $SPCX rewards -- a memecoin to honour SpaceX's next biggest launch! 📌Ca: 0x3eC8A8174129D5cBeCef67eE2AF8621319c34c03 📈Chart: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x037dea9a1851a87f997c42cc9bf18659675f642d01d28fc7b1cc94695a0ad54c 🔥Website: https://www.doge1coinrh.com/ 🔥X: https://x.com/Doge1C…
Doraemon 100X Calls pinned a photo
🪙Byte Humor ⭐ We are excited to welcome the Byte Humor team here on #Pinksale for their upcoming #Fairlaunch! We want to ensures every project is set up for success through a combination of professional guidance, strategic support, and focused resources.📊 💥 Byte Humor is an AI-powered memecoin launch community built to transform internet humor, viral creativity, and community attention into measurable on-chain part…
❤9🤩8❤🔥6👍6🔥6🎉5
Doraemon 100X Calls pinned a photo
🔥 AI CAT KING | $OSCAR 💥 $OSCAR brings together AI culture, viral meme power, and a globally recognized cat with a community ready to send it. ✅ King of AI Cats 🐱 ✅ World PowerSlap Champion & Ambassador 🥊 ✅ Strong viral meme identity ✅ Growing cult-like community ✅ Fresh Solana launch 🚀 ✅ Massive upside if the narrative catches fire 🌐 From AI memes to mainstream attention. 📌 Contract: Crc9kuYPWG5pJwrNS8MeUq72Bbxxn…
🔥19❤12🎉11👍9
Doraemon 100X Calls pinned a photo
🔥 I invested $500 in Olden Era — now I’m making around $100 a day I’m reinvesting everything to strengthen my squad. After testing different modes, I chose Campaign because it currently gives me the best returns. To start, you’ll need a Warlord and a few creatures. A rare card from a pack can significantly speed up your progress. I haven’t pulled a top-tier card yet, but the results already look promising. Played H…
👍15🔥13🤩12🎉11❤10❤🔥9
Doraemon 100X Calls pinned a photo
💰 ROBINHOOD CHAIN | $CHUMP THE CHICKEN WITH A BILLION-DOLLAR MISSION! 🐔🇺🇸 💥 $CHUMP is bringing a powerful meme narrative to the Robinhood Chain, backed by serious funding, strong branding, and a community united behind one massive goal. ✅ Built on Robinhood Chain ✅ Iconic chicken-themed meme branding 🐔 ✅ Well-funded team & serious backing ✅ Strong community-driven narrative ✅ Aped around $11M market cap ✅Massive t…
❤🔥6👍6🔥6🎉5🤩5❤2
Doraemon 100X Calls pinned a photo
🔥✅ RWA INC ($RWAINC) – Bringing Real-World Assets On-Chain The financial world is entering a new era where ownership, liquidity, and investment opportunities are no longer limited by borders or large capital requirements. 🌍 RWA INC ($RWAINC) is building the bridge between traditional assets and blockchain technology, creating a future where real-world assets can become more accessible, transparent, and efficient th…
👍8🎉7🔥7🤩7❤6❤🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @Dorammon100XCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@brainzdotlol · 361 postChump Coin Official Announcement Channel
@CHUMPCOIN21B · 4,3441 postCZTerminal Token
@czterminal · 2,1061 postDoge-1 Announcement Channel
@Doge1onRH · 4211 post$GTAVI Portal
@GTAVI_Network · 4281 post$RWAINC Announcements
@RWA_Inc_Announcements · 40,8781 postSHIBCAT
@SHIBCATRH · 8161 postSolcat Portal
@Solcat_Entry · 351 postStonkFun
@StonkFunXyz · 2,8971 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Doraemon 100X Calls” (@Dorammon100XCalls), 22,966 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dorammon100XCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.