Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Долговые ИИдеи

Channel

Долговые ИИдеи

@DolgovWB

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

384subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001319070542
TypeChannel
Username@DolgovWB
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DolgovWB

Growth

384387385.57 August 2026 — 387 subscribers8 August 2026 — 387 subscribers16 August 2026 — 385 subscribers24 August 2026 — 384 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 384–387 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 09:35384-1
16 Aug 2026, 08:44385-2
8 Aug 2026, 06:03387no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:52387first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
53m 57s
Average length
17m 59s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

191 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥13168.6%
❤‍🔥2513.1%
2211.5%
🤣115.76%
custom 544969261815169599710.524%
👀10.524%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 191reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2025 to 29 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DolgovWB. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 March 2025 to 29 March 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.56%
1 of 18 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
443
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
520
over 17 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
cm3zzrowf0000j8fxv81kp1c0111 March 202511 March 2025

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2025 to 29 March 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

29 Mar 2025, 12:34 UTC≈1,010 views24 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Смотрел рекламные интеграции в оффлайн бизнесе Это мой топ 😂 Вот эта штука называется вирусной рекламой Вроде и добрая, но охватов набирает будь здоров) Как вам ?

🔥13🤣91👀1

24 Mar 2025, 18:18 UTC776 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥3

24 Mar 2025, 18:17 UTC691 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥3

17 Mar 2025, 19:48 UTC635 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥52❤‍🔥1

17 Mar 2025, 19:46 UTC562 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4🔥3custom 54496926181516959971

17 Mar 2025, 19:45 UTC520 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

6❤‍🔥3🔥2

15 Mar 2025, 18:03 UTC515 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥11

11 Mar 2025, 17:03 UTC544 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А мой кабинет постепенно превращается в склад 😂😂 Наводим порядок, проводим инвентаризацию, увеличиваем ассортимент Не теряйте меня, я погряз в болтах😂😂😂

🔥111

11 Mar 2025, 17:01 UTC496 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Подкаст на тему «Процесс создания ИИ - ассистента» Если полезно, ставь ❤️🔥

🔥16

11 Mar 2025, 16:52 UTC443 viewsread 8 August 2026
Advertisementerid cm3zzrowf0000j8fxv81kp1c0

Вадим, можете ли приоткрыть процесс создания ии- ассистента на этой платформе, из вашего видео? https://my.eureka-ai.tech/signup/?partnerId=cm3zzrowf0000j8fxv81kp1c0

10 Mar 2025, 18:50 UTC441 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @DolgovWB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Mar 2025, 10:18 UTCAnonymous Poll27 voters

Ну что, признавайтесь, кто смотрел моё видео выше 👆👆👆👆👆👆?

  1. Да, я смотрел, кайф37%
  2. Сегодня буду смотреть7%
  3. Ещё не смотрел(а), думаю на неделе этой посмотрю48%
  4. Долго слишком, не хочу смотреть0%
  5. Не интересна данная тем4%
  6. Другой ответ в комментариях4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2025 to 29 March 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

recepti.pema
@Recepti_Pema · 96,023
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Долговые ИИдеи” (@DolgovWB), 384 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DolgovWB.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.