Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Доктор Боровских

Channel

Доктор Боровских

@DoctorBorovskih

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20,962subscribers

-152 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001263816046
TypeChannel
Username@DoctorBorovskih
DescriptionВячеслав Боровских, врач психотерапевт, автор метода нравственно-ориентированной психотерапии. № 4876647233
Created16 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/DoctorBorovskih

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

20,95421,11421,0346 August 2026 — 21,114 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,111 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,110 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,103 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,098 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,091 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,090 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,082 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,076 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,074 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,068 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,067 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,060 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,057 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,049 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,048 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,047 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,044 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,045 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,048 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,053 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,049 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,046 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,042 subscribers9 September 2026 — 21,044 subscribers11 September 2026 — 21,031 subscribers13 September 2026 — 21,027 subscribers15 September 2026 — 21,022 subscribers19 September 2026 — 21,023 subscribers25 September 2026 — 21,042 subscribers4 October 2026 — 21,031 subscribers8 October 2026 — 21,024 subscribers13 October 2026 — 21,022 subscribers14 October 2026 — 21,014 subscribers15 October 2026 — 21,009 subscribers16 October 2026 — 21,008 subscribers18 October 2026 — 21,006 subscribers19 October 2026 — 20,996 subscribers20 October 2026 — 20,995 subscribers21 October 2026 — 20,993 subscribers23 October 2026 — 20,989 subscribers24 October 2026 — 20,986 subscribers25 October 2026 — 20,983 subscribers26 October 2026 — 20,984 subscribers28 October 2026 — 20,974 subscribers29 October 2026 — 20,971 subscribers30 October 2026 — 20,962 subscribers31 October 2026 — 20,957 subscribers3 November 2026 — 20,954 subscribers4 November 2026 — 20,956 subscribers5 November 2026 — 20,962 subscribers6 November 2026 — 20,960 subscribers8 November 2026 — 20,961 subscribers9 November 2026 — 20,963 subscribers11 November 2026 — 20,970 subscribers14 November 2026 — 20,962 subscribers20,9626 August 202614 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 100 days, net -152. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,930–21,138 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 12:1720,962-8
11 Nov 2026, 16:4620,970+7
9 Nov 2026, 21:3520,963+2
8 Nov 2026, 15:1720,961+1
6 Nov 2026, 10:3920,960-2
5 Nov 2026, 10:0820,962+6
4 Nov 2026, 07:1120,956+2
3 Nov 2026, 06:2120,954-3
31 Oct 2026, 05:0820,957-5
30 Oct 2026, 07:1820,962-9
29 Oct 2026, 04:5820,971-3
28 Oct 2026, 00:2520,974-10
26 Oct 2026, 22:1720,984+1
25 Oct 2026, 18:5520,983-3
24 Oct 2026, 19:0820,986-3
23 Oct 2026, 17:2720,989-4
21 Oct 2026, 09:0120,993-2
20 Oct 2026, 08:5620,995-1
19 Oct 2026, 08:0020,996-10
18 Oct 2026, 07:1921,006first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 84 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 20,962 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,980
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held52 (21 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total80,340
Reactions total2,162
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 16:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,140
Videos
≈438
Links
≈1,250

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 34s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,052 reactions across 52 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,70073.2%
👍66713.2%
🔥56911.3%
👏681.35%
🤬410.812%
😁70.139%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,052 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 52 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DoctorBorovskih. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 52 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 15:01 UTC≈1,050 views57 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Помните, как у нас в девяностые жилось? Страна разваливалась, заводы стояли, люди месяцами не получали зарплату. А во главе государства человек, который мог появиться перед всей страной в нетрезвом виде. И мы уже почти привыкли. Посмеялись над очередной выходкой, обсудили, забыли. Удивительно, насколько это похоже на жизнь обычной семьи алкоголика. Сначала муж выпивает по праздникам. Потом по пятницам. Потом начина…

👍36❤13🔥8

12 Nov 2026, 16:15 UTC≈1,630 views73 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

«В наших храмах почти нет молодёжи!» — часто слышу эту жалобу от священников и прихожан. Начинаются разговоры о том, как привлечь молодых людей в Церковь. Может, говорить с ними на их языке? Подстраиваться под их интересы? Придумывать новые форматы, чтобы им было интересно? А я вот думаю: зачем мы так стараемся? Разве Христос нуждается в том, чтобы Его кто-нибудь выбирал? В Евангелии есть притча о блудном сыне. Мол…

🔥42❤29👍2

12 Nov 2026, 09:22 UTC≈1,710 views51 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @rpodvizhnikPhoto

Дорогие подвижники! ⚡️ Спешим сообщить, что сегодня на ваши вопросы будет отвечать наш друг — священник Никита (Заболотнов)❤️ Да, да, тот самый отец Никита, который записывал для нашего радио цикл передач о христианском воспитании детей (по секрету: скоро новые выпуски в эфире!). Тот самый будущий настоятель храма, который мы строим всем миром. Присоединяйтесь к прямому эфиру в 16:00 (МСК) и задавайте свои вопросы! …

❤42👍9

11 Nov 2026, 13:33 UTC≈2,100 views69 reactions1 Starread 15 November 2026
Video

Можно расписаться в ЗАГСе, обвенчаться в храме и при этом относиться к собственной жене как к вещи.

❤45👍18🔥3🤬3

10 Nov 2026, 14:31 UTC≈2,880 views164 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Умерших теперь предлагают возвращать к жизни с помощью нейросетей. И люди готовы за это платить. Загружаете фотографии, записи голоса, переписки покойного родственника, и искусственный интеллект создает его цифровую копию. Она разговаривает с вами, отвечает на вопросы, может даже сказать, что любит вас и скучает. В Китае подобные услуги уже стали отдельным бизнесом. Люди платят за возможность снова поговорить с уме…

🔥82❤29🤬28👍23👏2

10 Nov 2026, 09:24 UTC≈2,230 views56 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Что происходит с человеком, когда он верит в выздоровление? Почему надежда иногда помогает переносить болезнь и лечение, а её потеря сильно меняет состояние человека? И где здесь медицина, психика и вера? 4 декабря буду в Кирове с лекцией «Только верь». Хочу поговорить о том, что я много лет вижу в работе врача. Врач лечит болезнь, но исцеляет всегда надежда. Без веры в выздоровление таблетка остаётся просто химиче…

❤37👍19

5 Nov 2026, 15:46 UTC≈3,090 views72 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Мы считаем древних идолопоклонников дикарями. Они поклонялись деревянным истуканам, каменным идолам, золотому тельцу. А сами мы далеко от них ушли? Посмотрите, что происходит на концертах и стадионах. Десятки тысяч людей собираются ради одного человека. А сколько времени мы проводим перед экранами смартфонов? Следим за чужой жизнью, восхищаемся знаменитостями. Футбольные матчи – это вообще отдельная история. Мы дох…

❤52🔥14👍4😁2

5 Nov 2026, 05:52 UTC≈3,070 views33 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @rpodvizhnikPhoto

Готовы задавать свои вопросы? Мы готовы принимать ваши звонки и сообщения!❤️ Сегодня в 11:00 по МСК услышимся в прямом эфире радио. Как задать вопрос: - Звоните по номеру 89122837946; - Отправляйте вопрос через приложение радио «Подвижник».

❤29🔥3👏1

3 Nov 2026, 17:05 UTC≈3,240 views82 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

США и Китай стремительно развивают искусственный интеллект. А Россия в этой гонке отстаёт. И многих это тревожит. Не окажемся ли мы в полной зависимости от чужих технологий? Не останемся ли на обочине научного прогресса? Сегодня нейросети проникают в экономику, медицину, науку, оборону. Мы всё больше полагаемся на технологии и всё меньше задумываемся о том, какое место в нашей жизни остаётся Богу. Так нужно ли Росс…

❤54🔥15👍11👏2

3 Nov 2026, 13:20 UTC≈2,810 views55 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Человек может быть страшен в гневе. Умные люди говорят, что в гневе нельзя принимать никаких решений. Сначала нужно успокоиться. А можем ли мы привести себя а спокойное состояние? И что такое гнев? Сегодня на «Вечере с доктором Боровских» разбираем страсть гнева. Присоединяйтесь, все видео доступны в записи: Вечер с Доктором Боровских

❤41👍8🔥6

2 Nov 2026, 09:03 UTC≈2,850 views42 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

22 ноября в Санкт-Петербурге проведу большую групповую консультацию о зависимости. Это будет не короткая лекция на час. У нас будет пять часов работы. За это время можно спокойно разобрать, как устроена зависимость, что происходит с близкими, почему семья годами ходит по одному кругу и что в этой ситуации действительно можно изменить. Поговорим о созависимости, контроле, обещаниях, срывах, лечении, детях в семье зав…

❤31👍9👏2

1 Nov 2026, 12:20 UTC≈2,880 views190 reactions2 Starsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Попробуйте сегодня предложить молодому человеку прочитать серьезную книгу. Страниц триста, без картинок. Не послушать аудиоверсию на двойной скорости, не посмотреть пересказ на YouTube, а просто сесть и прочитать. Да еще потом обсудить прочитанное. Для многих это уже непосильная задача. Мы всё чаще возвращаемся к культуре, в которой человек преимущественно слушает и смотрит. Только раньше люди запоминали огромные об…

❤138👍35🔥17

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @DoctorBorovskih. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Доктор Боровских” (@DoctorBorovskih), 20,962 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DoctorBorovskih.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.