Channel
@DoctorBarati
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001001016726 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DoctorBarati |
| Description | توجه خواهشا در نظر داشته باشید این کانال صرفا دیدگاههای شخصی است ابدا کسی حرفها را، ملاک تصمیم گیری قرار ندهد درست انتخاب کنیم در این کانال هیچ تحلیلی ارائه نمیشود، چون تحلیل را فقط از مشاوران اقتصادی باید بگیرید بررسی و پژوهش نیز با خودتان هست 🙏🏼 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DoctorBarati |
Recorded in 2019 as “DoctorBarati” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 22 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 22 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2023 to 15 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
منشگل ترکیبی از سال ۹۸ و ۹۹ دارم یه جزیی در حد ده ملیون هم سال ۴۰۲ فروختم چون گیر بودم هنوز تو ضرررم. شپاکسا هم سال ۹۹ خریدم اونم هنوز تو ضررم حدود ۱۱۰ ملیون از ۹۸ تا ۹۹ شگل خریدم البته یه ده ملیونش را دو سال پیش فروختم تازه شپاکسا دو هفته قبل حدود ۱۴ هزار تا اضافه کردم تا رند بشه و بشه ۴۷۰ هزار
من شگل از،سال ۹۹ دارم و ۵۰ درصد ضررم
Photo, posted without a caption
#بازار بورس @HalaNews
👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽 تاریخ رو ببینید... نمیدونم از بچه های قدیم کسی مونده یا نه... اما برید ببینید، تو هیچ فضای فارسی و ایرانی چنین پیشبینی های درستی نبوده و نیست... #همین 😎 @DoctorBarati
اين ويديو را ديدم تعجب كردم فكر كردم اشتباه ديدم. يعني سواد اقتصادي جناب آقاي رسايي از خيلي ها بيشتر ، بخصوص آن اقتصاددان هايي كه بورس را سبب تورم مي دانستند ٠
ایران تنها کشوری تو دنیا هستش که کارخونه خودروسازی ضرر میکنه ولی خریداران خودروی اون کارخونه سود میکنن ...!!! 😐😐😐 این پست رو دوبار بخون ، چون راجب خوردوسازی صحبت نمیکنم
والا شاخص که داره یه کله میره بالا این رنج منفی میزنه، امان از روزی که شاخص بخواد یه نفسی تازه کنه، اونوقت میبینید که تهش سوراخه 😁
در بورس هر وقت خبرهای بد را سانسور می کنند و افشا های مثبت الکی می زنند و خبر های خوب شایعه می کنند نشانه اینه دارند خالی می کنندد، هروقت هی پشت سر هم خبر بد منتشر می کنند مثل الان ، نشونه اینه دارند جمع می کنند، ۱۷ اردیبهشت دو تا نامه را سانسور کردند و از ما بهنران خالی کردند و خیلی نمادها لز ۱۷ اردیبهشت تا حالا نصف شده ، حالا که کلی ریزش داشته تازه دارند اون خبرهای بد را بولد می کنند و نامه ها را منتشر می کنند، خ…
👍1
#رنو #ساندرو https://bama.ir/car/renault-sandero-y1396
یعنی واقعا صعودم داره من از وقتی خریدم همش تو سقوطه
سلام من تو این سهام ۳۰درصد تو ضررم بنظرتون میره بالا یا نه
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DoctorBarati. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نظرات صرفا شخصی” (@DoctorBarati), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DoctorBarati.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.