4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,588–2,614 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 13:27
2,591
-15
10 Aug 2026, 19:18
2,606
-5
6 Aug 2026, 11:07
2,611
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:46
2,611
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.06%
avg views ÷ 2,591 subscribers
Avg views / post
183
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
26 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
4,753
Reactions total
280
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 53s
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
280 reactions across 26 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
162
57.9%
👍
44
15.7%
🔥
42
15.0%
🥰
10
3.57%
🙏
5
1.79%
❤🔥
4
1.43%
😁
4
1.43%
🤯
4
1.43%
👏
3
1.07%
🤔
2
0.714%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 280reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Если сложный период длится месяц — возможно, это просто сложный период.
Если он длится десять лет — это уже способ жить.
Вот закончу этот проект — выдохну.
Вот решу вопрос с деньгами.
Вот дети немного подрастут.
Вот найду нормальных сотрудников.
Вот переедем.
Вот закончится этот пиздец — и тогда начну нормально жить.
И так проходит год, потом ещё один...
Меняются проекты, страны, люди, проблемы.
А внутреннее сос…
Иногда мы так стараемся сделать жизнь «правильной», что забываем её проживать.
Чтобы всё получилось.
Чтобы люди вели себя так, как нам хочется.
Чтобы обстоятельства наконец сложились удачно.
Чтобы мы сами стали чуть лучше, спокойнее, мудрее…
А жизнь тем временем уже идёт 😄
Да, может не идеальная. И где-то сложная. Где-то смешная.
Иногда совсем не по плану.
И, может быть, принятие — это не сказать:
«Мне всё нравитс…
Человек может искренне работать ради семьи.
Он хочет дать близким жильё, образование, безопасность и возможности, которых не было у него самого.
Но иногда семья платит за это отсутствием самого человека.
Он находится рядом телом, но продолжает решать рабочие задачи. Любой разговор превращает в поиск решения. Не выдерживает чужих эмоций. Просит подождать, пока закончится очередной сложный период.
А сложный период …
Иногда человек уже находится в совершенно других обстоятельствах, но продолжает жить по старым внутренним правилам.
Проблемы, которые когда-то заставляли его постоянно быть начеку, уже решены. Появились деньги, возможности, жильё, опыт и влияние.
Но внутри всё ещё звучит:
«Не расслабляйся».
«Никому не доверяй».
«Всё может внезапно измениться».
«Если перестану контролировать — случится плохое».
И тогда даже в спок…
Сегодня вечером проведем УПС-разбор. Все, кому откликается вопрос ценности себя, выбора себя, программа «меня не замечают» — есть возможность присоединится к разбору в 20:00. Пишите в комментарии «Ценность» и мы вышлем ссылку на zoom за 5 минут до начала эфира.
Можно выйти из бедности и всё равно продолжать жить так, будто завтра снова придётся выживать.
Доход вырос. Бизнес стал устойчивее. Появились возможности. Но внутри всё ещё звучит:
«Не останавливайся».
«Этого недостаточно».
«Всё можно потерять».
И тогда деньги перестают быть только ресурсом. Они становятся попыткой купить абсолютную безопасность, которой не существует.
🔥На открытом эфире разберём, почему успешный…
🌟 А вы давно гуляли не для шагов, а для удивления?
Учёные даже придумали для этого название — awe walks.
Это такие прогулки, во время которых человек специально замечает вокруг что-то красивое, необычное и вызывающее восхищение.
Здесь не важна скорость.
Здесь важно совсем другое:
как красиво свет ложится на дома;
какое сегодня огромное небо;
как ветер шевелит листья;
как цветы, облака или старое дерево вдруг цепля…
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @DobroTvorenye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 123,713 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ТвориДобро✨Духовное развитие✨Ретриты” (@DobroTvorenye), 2,591 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DobroTvorenye.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.