🥖89 рк. 🤩 следующую работу увидите только когда наберете 160 рк.

Channel
⎯ ”𝕻ℴ𝗋ֺ𝐭︨ 𝕶ℯֺ𝒻ִֺ𝒾𝗋ֺ𝒶„ 𓈒 ּ
@DkmKefir
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
339subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002493781572 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DkmKefir |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DkmKefir |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 339 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 340 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 116.3%
- avg views ÷ 339 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 394
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 21.8%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,700 |
| Reactions total | 760 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
894 reactions across 8 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5361782879644862578 | 97 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5251477064237744161 | 94 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5325924966489684182 | 84 | 9.40% | |
| custom 5326027117991849149 | 76 | 8.50% | |
| custom 5276240905068633809 | 69 | 7.72% | |
| custom 5325967770133756366 | 47 | 5.26% | |
| custom 5215228760030214227 | 45 | 5.03% | |
| custom 5467804379274836660 | 43 | 4.81% | |
| custom 5213004821669380342 | 42 | 4.70% | |
| custom 5361792401587349529 | 42 | 4.70% | |
| custom 5233548011023398842 | 41 | 4.59% | |
| custom 5325565842799228108 | 41 | 4.59% | |
| custom 5274220561042534325 | 39 | 4.36% | |
| custom 5210900618406821712 | 38 | 4.25% | |
| custom 5235644698093185375 | 37 | 4.14% | |
| custom 5361869118293189484 | 26 | 2.91% | |
| custom 5364003717039301035 | 12 | 1.34% | |
| custom 5211052449795701683 | 9 | 1.01% | |
| custom 5233448268997885753 | 7 | 0.783% | |
| custom 5233443772167124973 | 5 | 0.559% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 894reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 151
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 6
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
- Most on one post
- 110
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DkmKefir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌷🌷ׅ 🤩ew 🤩ork 𓈒 ׁ ≡⎯꯭ 🌷 𓈒 ⎯ 🌷 ⎯ 𓎟𓎟 ׄ🥖#Practice🤍#Banner. 🥖𓈒 ׁ ≡⎯꯭ 💕💕💕 𓈒 ׁ 🌟Я делал этот баннер одному писателю. Banner for @Book_DrRatio 🥖🌟🌟🕯🕯🕯🕯
custom 527422056104253432532custom 532602711799184914931custom 527624090506863380928custom 54678043792748366605
😀😀😀 ২ׅ 🤩𐐫ℓֺ֪🤩α̫֮֮۫ϐׁ 𓈒 ׁ ≡⎯꯭ 🎁 𓈒 ⎯ 💋 ⎯ 𓎟𓎟 ׄ 🖤🖤🌟🤍ема: пейринги из геншина ִ ׄ ꒱֫ ּ Чтобы участвовать нужно.. 🤍🤍🤩. Репостнуть к себе в канал данный пост (не стикером). 🥖🤩 🤩. Написать свой юз, псевдоним и юз вашего канала. 🤍🔤осле всех этих действий я сам напишу вам и скину ссылку на группу, где будет дополнительная информация. 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🌟🌟🥖ִ𝗆ִℯִֺ𝗆ִ𝖻ℯֺ𝗋ֺ:: @tetradbcmertu …
custom 52762409050686338093custom 53260271179918491492custom 52742205610425343251
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌷🌷ׅ 🤩ew 🤩ork 𓈒 ׁ ≡⎯꯭ 🌷 𓈒 ⎯ 🌷 ⎯ 𓎟𓎟 ׄ🥖#Order🤍#Avatar. 🥖𓈒 ׁ ≡⎯꯭ 💕💕💕 𓈒 ׁ 🌟Привет, заказ был сделан за спасибо, не удивляйтесь, что он такой всратый. 🥖🌟🌟🕯🕯🕯🕯
custom 532602711799184914943custom 527624090506863380938custom 546780437927483666038custom 52742205610425343256
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌹🌹ׅ 🤩ew 🤩ork 𓈒 ׁ ≡⎯꯭ 💕 𓈒 ⎯ 💕 ⎯ 𓎟𓎟 ׄ🥖#Order🤍#Banner. 🥖𓈒 ׁ ≡⎯꯭ 💕💕💕 𓈒 ׁ 🌟Заказ моей любимой мюсле. Хотел бы поблагодарить Рэй за помощь!!! 🥖🌟🌟🕯🕯🕯🕯
custom 532592496648968418255custom 525147706423774416152custom 536178287964486257851custom 53640037170393010358
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DkmKefir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 48,740 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@bann_gifu · 902 posts𝒮 urprise from 𝒜lora||ИКМ༄˖°
@Aloraa_simm · 431 postЗаморозка
@an43l_c0m · 331 post◤Anᴏnyʍ's Wᴇʙsiᴛᴇ◥ 🔗
@AnonimWebsite · 161 post[ПЕРЕЕЗД!] 𝖣𝗂𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖿ó𝗅𝗂𝗈
@DIAB3T3S_PORT · 581 postD I A M O N D | design
@Diamondport · 61 post[𝑪𝒍𝒐𝒔𝒆𝒅]Geto cm/cf
@getocf · 121 post🗽 Hightᵖᵒʳᵗ
@HypnoHight · 321 post𓈒ㅤׁ ᨦ 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢 ::
@Info_SefkasPortfolio · 161 post𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗡𝗘𝗟 𝗥𝗜
@InfoChannelRi1 · 71 postRAY’S INFO
@jskqldoxiwneb · 91 post꒳𝓜𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓪|𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓽[ᴅᴋᴍ/iᴋʍ/ᴋᴋʍ] Пушин
@mellisa_port00 · 1721 post†꤬۫◝ ﹫ 𝕻𝐎𝐑𝐓.. 𝕽۫𝐈𝐍 ╪ #𝐌𝐊𝐌
@P0RTF1LI0Rin · 591 post[РЕСТ] ㅤ• 𝕽𝐄𝐈𝐊𝐀 ┊ 𝕻𝐎𝐑𝐓’, ㅤ۟ ㅤ ۫ㅤ ུ,
@RE1KAPORT · 591 post//𝖱𝗎𝖻𝗒'𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈.!¡
@rubysp0rt_info · 341 postrestㅤ░⃝𝙏a͝᪾mːi𝐨'𝐬 ֻ𝙡it!𝖙ؔ𝖑e rࣼ𝑜𝘰𝘮.̼
@simpTamio · 311 postInfo VDH
@VDHRay7 · 71 post𝐕𝕴𝐃𝐄𝕺 𝕶𝐌 | 𝗩𝗲𝗶𝗹 𝗢𝗳 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝘁愛 #𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍
@vide0_km · 591 post𝑉𝐼𝑉𝐼𝐷 𝐷𝑅𝐸𝐴𝑀 𝐻𝑂𝑈𝑆𝐸ᵈᵏᵐ
@vividDreamHouse1 · 3291 post:💞:☨ꪀ𝐍⨍𝐨_zׁׁׅׅ֬֬𝐈ᨰׁׅ.
@ZiwY_portinf · 51 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@angelverr1m · 1301 post[рест]\(Баттл!)A꯱ֺ֪ჩ᷎︩͘ꪱᩙℓֺ֪ ⋮ P𖦹ɾ໋ȶֵٞ𝗳︫ ๋𐐫ℓֺ֪ꪱᩙ𐐫. ժׁׅ݊kოܹܳ𑪍
@AshilPort · 2461 postКнижка Доктора Рацио
@Book_DrRatio · 6,3391 postРЕСТ 𝓗𝓾𝓻𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓯𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓸 [𝓓𝓚𝓜]
@Hyrma_portfolio · 791 postㅤ᷼ৎั𑪍᮫᠀݃ 𝐥ყ⃪ᩘ𐓣ᥒ ֵ ⃑ թ𑄝⃪᜔ࣰ𝒓𝐭𑣩ׅ֩፝ ◞ࣲ︠︡᷼꒱ꨲ֔◝𝃡
@LYNNP0RT · 2411 post‧₊˚𝑷𝒆𝒂𝒄𝒉 𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒆‿◞ ྀི
@Peachtreebanners · 2451 post[рест до ?] порт рикко
@portfolio_rikko · 1291 post.ּׁ 𓈒ֵ۫⃝𖹭 ፝֟𝐩ִ𝐨ִ⃜𝐫𝐭ִׄ𝐟ׄ𝐨ׄ𝐥ᮢ𝐢𝐨⁞⵿⃨♡゙゙ᩘ𝐧ִׄყִׄ𝐮۫⸼⃨✿ᩬᰰ
@portfolionyu · 3711 postPORT— ׅʚ Mບ࣪sׄℓi𐐼ׄ᷼ ‚🌷˖ ꒱
@tetradbcmertu · 571 post癒 | 𝑉𝘦𝑙𝑣𝘦𝑡 𝑃𝘰𝑟𝑡
@ve1lvet_port · 801 post𝑉𝐼𝑉𝐼𝐷 𝐷𝑅𝐸𝐴𝑀 𝐻𝑂𝑈𝑆𝐸ᵈᵏᵐ
@vividDreamHouse1 · 3291 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⎯ ”𝕻ℴ𝗋ֺ𝐭︨ 𝕶ℯֺ𝒻ִֺ𝒾𝗋ֺ𝒶„ 𓈒 ּ” (@DkmKefir), 339 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DkmKefir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.