4 measurements spanning 20 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 454–457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 07:57
457
+1
14 Aug 2026, 10:24
456
+2
8 Aug 2026, 05:00
454
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:30
454
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
68.4%
avg views ÷ 457 subscribers
Avg views / post
313
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
20 (30 July 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
4,691
Reactions total
90
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
114 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🐳
28
24.6%
🔥
22
19.3%
🫡
13
11.4%
🤩
12
10.5%
👍
9
7.89%
😍
8
7.02%
❤
7
6.14%
👏
7
6.14%
🙏
4
3.51%
😱
2
1.75%
🤯
2
1.75%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Took a $22 million long on $BTC as a hedge. Liquidation below 50k.
Thesis:
- every negative headline recently has driven the price up (Saylor selling, clarity act delay , war tensions etc)
- it broke out today of a 10 month downtrend (need to close above it / could be a fakeout)
- reclaimed above weekly/monthly 200 MA
🚨 CLARITY IS DELAYED.
🇺🇸 US Senate pushes the Crypto Clarity Act vote until after summer recess
Yet $BTC / crypto CAP pricing in as if it was passed
There is no logic in this space
Never stop clicking even if it makes no sense
seems like every negative headline keeps pushing price up.
Even if the Clarity act doesn’t pass right away they will be voting on it and discussing it tomorrow; it’s been confirmed by senator chairman Tim Scott of the Senate banking committee.
The holy grail catalyst for the crypto industry. Either way it’s a win win overall pro for crypto.
$BTC $ETH $XRP $SOL $ADA starting to move 👀 (cryptocurrencies included in USA’s 1st ever crypto federal reserve & digital stockpile)
Seeing a lot of speculation on CT that tomorrow we should receive an update regarding the clarity act - if by any chance it does pass
These are the 5 that will have the biggest instant gratification off any decision right away
A lot of CT is falling into the negative headline sentiment constantly presented by the media lately giving them a short stance at or near the bottom imo.
$BTC is trading above its monthly/weekly 200 MA (Moving Average)
Above MA it’s in a Bullish Macro trend. Unless bitcoin closes below 63.6-7k bulls are in control.
Liquidation Heatmap also reveals majority of the liquidity sits in short clusters above (ask) rathe…
Was checking charts live on stream through Tik Tok earlier today & found the most bullish chart in the entire crypto industry at the moment
That is Zcash $ZEC
I’m really hoping for a decent dip to size fully. I got a starter position here.
A lot of members in our premium elite group have been bag holding $DOGE for some time & asked for charting on it.
It is now sitting within the all time demand zone macro range.
similar to xrp these type of coins require heavy volume to move & have historically been used as indicators that trigger the start of the bull run.
I joined with a small long.
Clarity act approval is around the corner
Cryptocurrencies that were included in the United States 1st crypto Federal Reserve should react extremely positive when approved any minute now
Accumulating the following in a hurry:
$BTC $ETH $XRP $SOL $ADA
The only hope $XRP has is if retail does a CTO (community take over) on it & updates dexscreener with boost.
🫡4🐳2🤩2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DkLedger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DK’s Ledger - Perps + memes” (@DkLedger), 457 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DkLedger.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.