Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Divine Girls Club

@DivineGC

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

191subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002543285418
TypeChannel
Username@DivineGC
DescriptionUpper East Side alert! These divine devotees are navigating faith and purpose with a grace that’s anything but ordinary. XOXO, @Dgirlsclubot.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 16 May 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/DivineGC

Growth

19114 Aug 2026, 19:48 — 191 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 20:00 — 191 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 19:4814 Aug 2026, 20:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 190–192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:00191no change
14 Aug 2026, 19:48191first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 16 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Videos
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

201 reactions across 5 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53865379716273546024019.9%
custom 53391948434762879732813.9%
custom 5339362544769327855188.96%
💋157.46%
custom 5343642449615022300146.97%
custom 5386532753242089132136.47%
custom 5343718079694135842125.97%
custom 5343522439638836662115.47%
custom 5386320590447603979115.47%
custom 534631942971617284494.48%
🍾83.98%
custom 538676987409153492873.48%
💅31.49%
20.995%
🆒20.995%
🏆20.995%
💯20.995%
❤‍🔥10.498%
🎉10.498%
👀10.498%
1 further kind10.498%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 201reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2025 to 27 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
62
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 15 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
23
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DivineGC. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 May 2025 to 27 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Jan 2026, 13:14 UTC513 views38 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Chasing dreams, dodging red flags, and more cosmopolitan 🫒

💋15🍾8💅32🏆2💯2🆒2❤‍🔥1

19 May 2025, 14:10 UTC477 views38 reactions16 Starsread 14 August 2026
Video

There were Late Nights, Loud Laughs, and Lipstick-stained Regrets. But if being a little reckless is wrong, then we never wanted to be right. After all, being good was never the goal— “Not in perfection, but in the way we loved, laughed, and lit up every damn room.”

custom 538653797162735460214custom 53391948434762879735custom 53393625447693278555custom 53437180796941358423custom 53863205904476039793custom 53435224396388366622custom 53436424496150223002custom 53463194297161728442

19 May 2025, 14:10 UTC447 viewsread 14 August 2026

Dancing through nights that blurred into morning-after lattes, falling in and out of love with men, moments, and ourselves. And in between the chaos and cocktails… we found something divine.

18 May 2025, 12:55 UTC453 views54 reactions23 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Spotted! A congregation of faith, purpose, and undeniable grace. Their next move? You know you want to know.

custom 538653797162735460221custom 53393625447693278559custom 53436424496150223008custom 53435224396388366623custom 53437180796941358423custom 53391948434762879732custom 53463194297161728442custom 53863205904476039792

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @DivineGC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,165,963 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Divine Girls Club” (@DivineGC), 191 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DivineGC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.