Channel
@Disclose_ngo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
397subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001854099253 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Disclose_ngo |
| Description | Canal non officiel, non géré par Disclose. Relaie les posts de twitter.com/Disclose_ngo en instantané. › t.me/Brevesdepresse › t.me/afp_fr › t.me/Mediavenir_Live › t.me/CerfiaFRA › t.me/Reporterree › t.me/lessoulevements › t.me/BFMTV |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Disclose_ngo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 397 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 397 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
17 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 9 | 52.9% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 17.6% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 17.6% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Le but de ce nouveau front judiciaire n'est pas seulement d'intimider @Disclose_ngo Il vise à vous priver d'informations cruciales sur ce que l'État entreprend en notre nom. Pour mener bataille contre l'opacité de l'État, nous avons besoin de vous ! › Ouvrir sur X | Ouvrir l'article
🔴 La traque de nos sources s'amplifie La justice ordonne la réouverture de l'enquête contre @Disclose_ngo @AriaLavrilleux est à nouveau menacée de mise en examen et les quatre co-auteurs des #EgyptPapers vont être convoqués par un·e juge antiterroriste › Ouvrir sur X | Ouvrir l'article
🤯3
"Cette pratique n'est pas légale. Si elle est avérée, il y aura des sanctions lourdes", disait @NunezLaurent, en avril Trois mois plus tard, le ministère ferme les yeux, les hiérarchies encouragent la reconnaissance faciale illégale Révélations @Disclose_ngo avec France 2 ———————————— Citant @le20hfrancetele › (voir) 👀 Quand la police abuse de la reconnaissance faciale. Les forces de l’ordre prennent de plus en pl…
🤬2
🚨Flagrant délit de reconnaissance faciale illégale en contrôle d'identité En avril, le ministre @interieur_gouv rappelle ses troupes à l'ordre @Disclose_ngo x @FranceTV révèlent que la pratique reste quotidienne, témoignages exclusifs et vidéo à l'appui › Ouvrir sur X | Ouvrir l'article
A reposté → @AriaLavrilleux: La France vit sa 2ème canicule de l'année, a la moitié de ses bâtiments inadaptés aux changements climatiques... Mais la priorité du gouvernement c'est de financer une usine de plastique, avec l'argent de la transition Révélations @Disclose_ngo › Ouvrir sur X | Ouvrir l'article
*financer › Ouvrir sur X
Nous avons interrogé les services du Premier ministre sur l'ensemble de nos révélations Réponse, en résumé : les deux dossiers d’Ineos sont « en cours de contractualisation » mais « aucune aide n’a encore été versée » Traduire, la manœuvre du gouvernement n'a pas encore abouti › Ouvrir sur X
Cette enquête existe parce que des milliers d'anonymes nous soutiennent chaque mois ! Vos dons sont notre force ✨ › Ouvrir sur X | Ouvrir l'article
❤1
C'est un scandale à plus de 300 millions d'euros @Disclose_ngo révèle que @Matignon et @Economie_Gouv ont truqué deux appels à projets de l'Agence de la transition écologique @ademe Objectif : inancer sur fonds publics la firme pétrochimique @INEOS › Ouvrir sur X | Ouvrir l'article
🤬5
Pour rappel : Ariane Lavrilleux a bénéficié d’un non-lieu après avoir été poursuivie pour « appropriation et divulgation de secret de la défense nationale » Ses moindres faits et gestes ont été surveillés pendant des semaines › Ouvrir sur X | Ouvrir l'article
A reposté → @romainmielcarek: Le média @Disclose_ngo et la brillante journaliste @AriaLavrilleux sont de nouveau pris dans l'étau d'une justice utilisée pour limiter la liberté de la presse. Ariane a publié en 2021 une enquête qui a permis de révéler comme la Direction du renseignement militaire (DRM) était utilisée en Egypte pour contribuer à des opérations d'assassinats, alors qu'elle est sensée coopérer avec ce …
A reposté → @RSF_inter: #France : 3 ans après sa garde à vue & la perquisition de son domicile, l'acharnement judiciaire contre la journaliste @AriaLavrilleux de @Disclose_ngo se poursuit, signe d'une inquiétante criminalisation du journalisme. Une décision est attendue le 8/07. › Ouvrir sur X | Ouvrir l'article
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Disclose_ngo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 447,113 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Disclose_ngo named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Disclose” (@Disclose_ngo), 397 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Disclose_ngo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.